Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The differences in this election are so stark it is incomprehensible how any religious voter could even think of voting for anyone with a D after their name.
1 posted on 08/12/2008 11:25:34 AM PDT by Publius804
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Publius804

Good for the Dems! They have been taken over by moonbats and they are grossly overplaying their hands.


2 posted on 08/12/2008 11:28:14 AM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Publius804; All

Not so many years ago (1996) when the Demagogues were busy pandering to Middle America due to Clintonista mendacity, the DOMA passed with overwhelming support and President Bill Clinton signed it into law.

It should be easy to show how the spineless dishonest Demagouges are pandering again, now to their far-left moonbats who are taking over the party.

So in 1996 it was a great thing for Congress to pass DOMA overwhelmingly, but now in 2008 it is of great importance to suck up to the far-left Moonbats and oppose the DOMA. What a great party!!

Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) passed in 1996:

85-14 in the Senate
342-67 in the House

signed by President Bill Clinton on September 21, 1996.


3 posted on 08/12/2008 11:31:52 AM PDT by Enchante (If oil was botox then Nancy Pelosi would have us drilling everywhere!!! (hat tip, STARWISE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Publius804

How is this a surprise? The Democrat party has been the party of sexual activists for years. Conservatives should remember social issues, the military, and taxes. A lot of self styled big “conservative” poobahs want to talk about how the GOP is not much better than Democrats well tell me when the Democrats are going to honor our military by wanting America to win, tell me when they are going to honor traditional families, tell me when they are going to honor God and faith, honor the rights of individuals to keep what they earn? Those are some pretty big differences for me.


4 posted on 08/12/2008 11:32:29 AM PDT by Maelstorm (John McCain is ready to be commander in chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Publius804
I just pray our platform doesn't become more "inclusive" and reduce the contrasts!

Contrasting the old platforms

5 posted on 08/12/2008 11:33:39 AM PDT by pgyanke (Public "servants" have decided it's their job to use the public's money to fight the public)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Publius804

Good - they’re being honest about what they want.


7 posted on 08/12/2008 11:35:16 AM PDT by Uncledave (Zombie Reagan '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Publius804

I am so sick of having opinion’s dismissed because they are “divisive”. It is such an illogical argument. Of course everyone could be forced to spout the exact same Communist party line and thereby eliminate “division”, but that would not be freedom nor would it be America.


8 posted on 08/12/2008 11:35:52 AM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Publius804

Another change in the democrat platform -

a “stronger” support of “abortion rights”.

All women have the right to a legal abortion [on demand]
REGARDLESS OF ABILITY TO PAY.
This means that YOU will be paying to kill babies. YOU.
Your earned wealth, confiscated through the threat of lethal force, will be used to kill the most innocent humans in existance.

Also, gone is the language of “safe, legal, and RARE”.


10 posted on 08/12/2008 11:39:17 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Publius804
“We will enact a comprehensive bipartisan employment non-discrimination act,” says the platform draft.

No, that won't divided us, not at all! /s

“We oppose the Defense of Marriage Act and all attempts to use this issue to divide us.”

Huh? That Act is precisely how this nation addressed the divisiveness perpetrated by the sexually disoriented.
12 posted on 08/12/2008 11:45:47 AM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Publius804

Please don’t change your mind!


13 posted on 08/12/2008 1:26:06 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Publius804

You are right on the mark. Although it’s depressing to see so many Americans lining up to support someone, or someones, who openly support things that two generations ago weren’t even mentioned in polite society certainly makes it a clear cut choice as to the side 2008 voters will be supporting.

Hopefully, conservatives at every level will push ad campaigns that take no prisoners when they describe the differences in the two parties at this point in American history!


14 posted on 08/12/2008 2:43:57 PM PDT by jwparkerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson