[DeusExMachina05]

Interesting take, not sure if I could post the whole, click on the url to read the rest.

[counterpunch]

We will know McCain is the next president by 9pm EST/6pm PST.

[nikos1121]

I agree. There is no way Americans will vote for this guy once they hear his stand on the issues.

[pacobell]

Once again, Hillary is the Dimocrat nominee. Hillary is the next president of the US. God help us all.

[afortiori]

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again.

I think McCain is likely to take even Massachusetts, or come very close.

[J40000]

He’s in trouble because he’s a SOCIALIST and despite what the libs all think, America is NOT a socialist nation for the most part.

[Popman]

McCain will win, but I fear the "rat" party has been working behind the scenes ready to commit massive voter fraud to push their messiah over the edge to victory.

It takes surprising little number of votes to change the results in many states.

[SamAdams76]

There is going to be a lot of chatter about this election running right up until Election Day itself. People are going to speculate and certain people are going to be polled and polled and polled yet again.

The American electorate pretty much goes Republican when it comes time to choose a president. The article states only two Democratic presidents in past 40 years and they didn't win by much. The country really does want to vote Republican. When a decent Republican is found, the Republicans tend to win in landslides (i.e. Reagan in 1980 and 1984).

But Reagan aside, the Republicans do not do a good job delivering a nominee we can enthusiastically get behind. Just look at the clunkers the Republicans have put forth in recent elections...Bob Dole, George HW Bush, Gerald Ford, and now this here John McCain. Now these are all fine people but not great presidential material. Yet by and large, the Republicans find a way to win because the American people want them to.

Isn't it a shame that we cannot find more Ronald Reagan-type people to put on our ticket?