Posted on 08/11/2008 1:55:03 AM PDT by fightinJAG
Interesting!
“completely professional”
For a hooker, yes.
Typical politics
Was he “lying” when he DENIED the affair or was he “lying” when he admitted the affair.
I am losing sleep over this question. /s
Can’t these losers just go away?
They are so attention starved it wouldn’t surprise me is half this $hit is made up to keep their names on the surface.
Like the LAPD said about the paparazzi—behave yourself and no one will give a rats arse what you do.
some kind of time warp?
(I should have read the title again)
And we expected this hooker to say “I took illegal payoff/hush money, paid from Edwards campaign coffers, and should be indicted.” ...?
She’s a liar, just like her boy toy.
Edwards campaign procured her services.
Title tells us this happened in Oct 2007. Wake up guys!:) Just goes to show you how they all lie their butts off.
completely professional
For a hooker, yes.
It is the first profession.
So when was he lying? When he said he had an affair or said he didn’t?
Her statement seems useless at this point.
That was my thought...
Mostly likely they were lying during the affair.
To think we may have Edwards “friend” in the White House...
AH! The real two Americas!
The comments at the Washington Note were very interesting!
There is another “untruth” in her statement.
She apparently did not ‘complete’ her contract — she was fired.
“Darman wrote a small story about Edwards hiring a woman he had met in a bar that appeared in the Dec. 25, 2006, issue of Newsweek.
When he saw her again a few weeks later, Hunter said she’d been fired by the campaign and blamed Elizabeth Edwards.
“’Someday,’ Rielle said, ‘the truth about her is going to come out,’” Darman wrote.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.