Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Mis-spelling in title is as published.
1 posted on 08/10/2008 9:04:29 AM PDT by gorush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: gorush

The sell-out of America continues. Thank you Washington, DC.


2 posted on 08/10/2008 9:08:31 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gorush

The joys of so-called “free trade”.


3 posted on 08/10/2008 9:12:04 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (CHEVY VOLT COUNTDOWN: V minus 100 Weeks. Waiting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gorush

Thank Clinton


4 posted on 08/10/2008 9:12:25 AM PDT by TheThinker (Capitalism is the natural result of a democratic government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gorush
I am not sure how this is a bad thing. They cannot physically move the Chrysler Building out of the United States. They will want their investment to do well. They will still be required to pay taxes. Owning the Chrysler Building really doesn't diminish US sovereignty or jurisdiction over it in any way.

This is supply and demand at work, with capital and resources flowing in from outside to fill a vacuum. It is good to have foreign resources and capital flowing into the country for a change instead of it bleeding out to China.
6 posted on 08/10/2008 9:13:37 AM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gorush

And, last time I checked, they can’t move any of this land from its current location. With the Supreme’s Eminent Domain ruling, they can’t even be assured that they get to keep it. If the local government decides that it would be better used for low cost housing....


31 posted on 08/10/2008 9:47:16 AM PDT by Steamburg (Your wallet speaks the only language most politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gorush
Well, we shipped the jobs away. Might as well sell the real estate as well. My state is selling roads, if anyone is interested in buying one.

We can just print more money so we can rent America from the rest of the world.
35 posted on 08/10/2008 9:53:48 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gorush

The banks will not turn up their noses at these deals. Sixty cents on the dollar will have them salivating. Do you think Bank of America gives a damn who owns American soil? In addition to compliance with local zoning regs, when the bank owns the home (which is what an REO is) the bank is required to cover every expense attendant thereto, including property taxes, insurance and maintenance. This is a done deal. This is economic warfare at the community level. There are statutes which forbid the ownership of critical assets and infrastructure in the U.S. by foreign nationals. Congress must extend that definition, in a time of war, to include residential communities. But I don’t see this happening. The sovereign funds are not stupid. They would not be intent on this if they didn’t already know the demoralization of U.S. society, the greediness of our banking institutions, the ineptness of our regulatory apparatus, and the gutlessness of our government would permit it to succeed. Don’t expect a Congressional hearing. If you are conflicted about illegals accessing taxpayer funded social services, they will now also qualify for mideast-funded homes. When you have a foreign entity worth $650 billion trying to socially and economically destabilize your country, you can’t just call Jack Bauer. Do you think maybe Pelosi will lead the charge?


37 posted on 08/10/2008 9:57:13 AM PDT by 4Runner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gorush


Lost Sovereignity, Oil-rich Fund Eyeing Foreclosed US Homes

I’ve not read the book (linked below), but the general theme is
that the more trade the USA does with Communist China...
the more the USA (at least the dealing companies) will tow the Communist
Party line.
I’d not heard this term before, but the phenomenon of a ChiComm influence
on the USA is called “reverse convergence”.
I suppose it means the USA thinks they are influencing Mainland China
to be more democratic and capitalistic...when in fact the USa is being
influenced to be repressive (quiet about ChiComm’s control-freak methods)
and less profitable as capitalists.

In the Jaws of the Dragon: America’s Fate in the Coming
Era of Chinese Hegemony
by Eamonn Fingleton
(Rating so far: 4.5 out of 5 stars)
http://www.amazon.com/Jaws-Dragon-Americas-Chinese-Hegemony/dp/0312362323/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1218388071&sr=1-1


41 posted on 08/10/2008 10:18:53 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gorush

Historically when foreigners buy American land they over value it (because they come from smaller countries than us and land is more expensive there) and take a major bath. We’ll see how this plays out.


43 posted on 08/10/2008 10:36:20 AM PDT by boogerbear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gorush

Oh man I hope the Saudis buy up some of the dilapidated homes in Bridgeport and New Haven. I can’t wait to see them trying to collect rent from the Section 8 lowlifes who inhabit them.


45 posted on 08/10/2008 11:03:38 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gorush
Can anyone doubt that this is simply another maneuver in the economic war against the United States? If we were fighting on a battlefield, our generals would reinforce, flank, hold, something. But since there are no bullets flying, we stand here helpless while our economic sovereignty is assaulted as surely as the British stormed Breed's Hill.

Worse yet, this is all being done using our own money. The trillions of petrodollars we send overseas, combined with the billions we send to China in trade, have created an international fund available to our sworn enemies to use against us. The Arabs, the Chinese, and now (it would appear), the Russians, plus the various noisy satellites of Marxism around the world are all uniting to erode our dominance.

First, we need to pull the plug on China. Stop trade altogether. Second, we need an energy policy that does NOT rely on Mideast oil. And third, we need to quit apologizing for being successful and be confident in protecting our own interests.

In other words, we need Ronald Reagan's America back.

47 posted on 08/10/2008 11:09:50 AM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gorush
Can anyone doubt that this is simply another maneuver in the economic war against the United States? If we were fighting on a battlefield, our generals would reinforce, flank, hold, something. But since there are no bullets flying, we stand here helpless while our economic sovereignty is assaulted as surely as the British stormed Breed's Hill.

Worse yet, this is all being done using our own money. The trillions of petrodollars we send overseas, combined with the billions we send to China in trade, have created an international fund available to our sworn enemies to use against us. The Arabs, the Chinese, and now (it would appear), the Russians, plus the various noisy satellites of Marxism around the world are all uniting to erode our dominance.

First, we need to pull the plug on China. Stop trade altogether. Second, we need an energy policy that does NOT rely on Mideast oil. And third, we need to quit apologizing for being successful and be confident in protecting our own interests.

In other words, we need Ronald Reagan's America back.

48 posted on 08/10/2008 11:14:39 AM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gorush
Just let's hope that these cheap buyers of private homes do not realize or are not aware of the full load of real estate taxes in the U.S.
Compared to Europe, U.S taxes on private homes are in the stratosphere.
But then our city governments need this tax infusion for their hard laboring unionized staff and service employees who go out and unanimously vote to keep their political employers seated.
49 posted on 08/10/2008 11:15:05 AM PDT by hermgem (Will Olmr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gorush

If these properties were foreclosed once they could be again.
The buyers of individual US houses are usually individual Americans. If they can’t afford the houses the investors lose.


50 posted on 08/10/2008 11:24:50 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gorush

We could really use a bottom in the housing market..real estate funds buying large blocks of houses may be the only way.


54 posted on 08/10/2008 11:36:01 AM PDT by Fred (The Democrat Party is the Nadir of Nihilism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gorush
Foreigners buying up thousands of distressed homes is interesting. Imagine trying to keep the heat, water, taxes, mechanical condition, landscaping, and security in thousands of residential single family homes while thousands of miles away?

Commercial properties yes, but SFR housing? I doubt it.

61 posted on 08/10/2008 12:55:56 PM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AuntB

IMHO, this is an alarming trend.


66 posted on 08/10/2008 2:27:07 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (If Islam conquers the world, the Earth will be at peace because the human race will be killed off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gorush

Everything is a commodity, including people and nations. Those with power and money are the ones that control it.


68 posted on 08/10/2008 4:07:51 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gorush

Except in this case, it hearkens back to antiquity when residents were either in bondage or deep debt to absentee landlords. Pre-Classical Greece or feudal Europe come immediately to mind, but it was endemic in early history, and even recently in India & China.

Back then, though, people moved and colonized new lands, which is not really much of an option these days.


69 posted on 08/10/2008 5:12:13 PM PDT by P.O.E. (Thank God for every morning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: gorush

Except in this case, it hearkens back to antiquity when residents were either in bondage or deep debt to absentee landlords. Pre-Classical Greece or feudal Europe come immediately to mind, but it was endemic in early history, and even recently in India & China.

Back then, though, people moved and colonized new lands, which is not really much of an option these days.


70 posted on 08/10/2008 5:12:19 PM PDT by P.O.E. (Thank God for every morning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson