Skip to comments.
CNN Silences Employees – Forbids Them From Posting, Commenting, Etc.
Deus Ex Malcontent. and CNN ^
| CNN HR Department
Posted on 08/05/2008 9:15:06 AM PDT by MindBender26
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
CNN believes in Freedom of Speech for everyone.... except CNN employees... and Talk Radio hosts and listeners, of course.
To: MindBender26
Does this mean no more cheering at The Obama’s speeches?
2
posted on
08/05/2008 9:17:40 AM PDT
by
SlowBoat407
(ANWR would look great in pumps.)
To: MindBender26
and absolutely NO negative references to His Obamaness!
3
posted on
08/05/2008 9:17:42 AM PDT
by
the invisib1e hand
(when did the circus freak show escape and take over the entire world?)
To: SlowBoat407
Does this mean no more cheering at The Obamas speeches?I like your comment better than mine. Did they really do that?
4
posted on
08/05/2008 9:18:24 AM PDT
by
the invisib1e hand
(when did the circus freak show escape and take over the entire world?)
To: MindBender26
UNLESS GIVEN PERMISSION BY CNN MANAGEMENT, CNN EMPLOYEES ARE TO AVOID TAKING PUBLIC POSITIONS ON THE ISSUES AND PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONS ON WHICH WE REPORT This is from the ONION right?
5
posted on
08/05/2008 9:18:44 AM PDT
by
Bommer
(A Third Party can win when Republicans and Democraps stand for the same thing!)
To: MindBender26
Shouldn’t we start some kind of “Claims of McCarthyism” countdown clock?
6
posted on
08/05/2008 9:19:51 AM PDT
by
tcostell
(MOLON LABE - http://freenj.blogspot.com - RadioFree NJ)
To: MindBender26
Actually, the restrictions are well within the bounds of an employer - employee contract.
7
posted on
08/05/2008 9:20:14 AM PDT
by
PurpleMan
To: the invisib1e hand
No more cheering for The Shadow?????
8
posted on
08/05/2008 9:20:18 AM PDT
by
illiac
(If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
To: MindBender26
Is this the same CNN that broke away from a “discussion” of whether the press was favoring Obama to report that his plane had landed safely from his vacation to Europe?
9
posted on
08/05/2008 9:20:21 AM PDT
by
N. Theknow
(Kennedys: Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat; but they know what's best for us)
To: SlowBoat407
Does this mean no more cheering at The Obamas speeches? That may fall under the protection of religious expression.
10
posted on
08/05/2008 9:20:49 AM PDT
by
Always Right
(Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
To: All
Like these idiots NEED to post there personal preferences...
To: MindBender26
They are about to start shutting down access to blogs from military and government installations too.
That means we can’t even READ them, let alone post on them.
How nice.
My tax dollars, my computers. My news sources... screw that, I get what they FEED me now through a PA system.
Probably time to start looking for a new job
12
posted on
08/05/2008 9:21:33 AM PDT
by
Rick.Donaldson
(http://www.transasianaxis.com - Please visit for latest on DPRK/Russia/China/et al.)
To: MindBender26
None of it speaks to posting/publishing anonymously or under a pseudonym.
13
posted on
08/05/2008 9:24:41 AM PDT
by
davidlachnicht
("IF WE'RE ALL TO BE TARGETS, THEN WE ALL MUST BE SOLDIERS.")
To: Rick.Donaldson
No, probably time to quit your freaking whining and recall the days when:
a) people didn't think the world needed to hear about every useless thought they had, and
b) the world was too busy doing something useful to care about everyone else's useless thoughts.
Fortheluvofgawd, when did people become so intellectually incestuous?
To: MindBender26
Good grief. CNN is still trying to hide its agenda to get Democrats elected no matter what it takes? Is that outfit really so stupid as to believe that banning its employees from commenting and posting on various blogs and news forums will fool people? That fading network is even more pathetic than I thought.
To: MindBender26
If you identify yourself, or could in any way be identified, then you should not comment on anything CNN reports on. So then you can still comment on the following topics not reported on by CNN:
Success of the surge and victory in Iraq
John Edwards' love child
Democratic corruption in general
...
Imagine CNN's reaction if President Bush issued a similar executive order telling what all federal employees could say in public.
16
posted on
08/05/2008 9:26:58 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Whale oil: the renewable biofuel for the 21st century.)
To: PurpleMan
the restrictions are well within the bounds of an employer - employee contract. Very true. However its clear intent is to allow CNN to promote its preference with a single, unified voice. It makes one wonder if, perhaps, there are dissenters to the Obama theology??
17
posted on
08/05/2008 9:30:10 AM PDT
by
JimSEA
(just another liberal-bashing fearmonger)
To: the invisib1e hand
Hahahaha.
Why are you here?
18
posted on
08/05/2008 9:31:09 AM PDT
by
Rick.Donaldson
(http://www.transasianaxis.com - Please visit for latest on DPRK/Russia/China/et al.)
To: MindBender26
UNLESS GIVEN PERMISSION BY CNN MANAGEMENT, CNN EMPLOYEES ARE TO AVOID TAKING PUBLIC POSITIONS ON THE ISSUES AND PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONS ON WHICH WE REPORT.
If that edict is also applicable to the CNN program hosts and reporters, does that mean that CNN will stop broadcasting?
19
posted on
08/05/2008 9:35:33 AM PDT
by
adorno
To: Rick.Donaldson
Why are you here? target rich environment.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson