Posted on 08/03/2008 8:43:28 AM PDT by Graybeard58
Thank you. I am sure that is coming ... sooner than most think.
The government shall not infringe on the rights of citizens to bear arms, and you are innocent until proven guilty. That seems to have fallen by the way side. But after the right was passed for government to sell your family farm to a developer that promises to pay more taxes passed, the right to private property is gone too.
It seems that while I have been overseas America became Amerika.
The only path I see in the future is laden with blood, either the blood of a rightous revolution, or the blood of the people in death camps at the hands of the present government of the US.
We have crossed that slippery slope a while back I am afraid, there is no turning back now.
Seems like an outright violation of the 2nd amendment to me.
By their own logic, these legislators should be arrested before they have the chance to write unconstitutional laws.
One of my favorite threads at Free Republic
Makes me want to be an American in Israel
Israel Army Girls!
magic_mania/ ^
Posted on Fri Jul 21 11:57:18 2006 by dennisw
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1669904/posts
Pinciaro......another village idiot.
Quick, let’s seize all the cars in case someone might have a accident!
Nothing like due process eh ???
The things 9 yrs old and I dont recall this nanny tattletale BS before, but hopefully there will now be a challenge following Heller...
LFOD...
One of my favorites, too.
Like a policeman that took the gun in the first place or some politician who Fancy's a newer model. From my cold dead fingers,
The state's gun seizure law is considered the first and only law in the country that allows the confiscation of a gun before the owner commits an act of violence. Police and state prosecutors can obtain seizure warrants based on concerns about someone's intentions.Then hypothetically ....There are nearly 900,000 privately owned firearms in Connecticut today.
if the Legislature was about to pass a law, say an onerous Tax Increase, that they believed would 'outrage' the citizens, they could then first seize all 900,000 guns in the state under the guise that there'd be "concerns about gun owners intentions" if said law was passed.Yep, definitely constitutional.
/s
Civil action for deprivation of rights
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
With women like that in the Army it gives a whole new meaning to the word Shalom.
What would you propose?
Maybe an investigation, a warrant, and judicial review?
Just asking.
So just suppose someone became a risk to themselves or others and someone suspected? Then what? What should be done?
So if your dog pees on your neighbor’s flowers, and your neighbor calls the police on you and says he is afraid, the police will violate the Constitutional protection against privacy and seizure of private property, and unlawfully take what is yours.
This law is invalid, and therefore illegal.
Didn’t you read the article? Particularly the individual who was “suspected” by Police because he filed several vandalism complaints without satisfaction. He then resorted to installing a security system to protect himself, with motion detectors, video cameras etc,,,. All police found when they raided the home was his guns locked up in a safe. They confiscated them anyway.
It appears that any citizen who installs home security or locks their guns up is behaving “delusional” or “Paranoid”, which warrants them to storm the premises and confiscate all firearms.
Here again, based on their interpretation to all the facts. And you have trouble seeing what is wrong about all of this in the first place?
I don’t get that.
Fascism when practiced by government is still fascism. Only it’s called “law”.
“...the state imposed a sales tax if you didn’t put the proceeds of your sale back into California real estate.”
Really? We sold our condo and bought our current home in 2001. At least we are within a 10 minute drive to hubby’s work and in a stable area that is not getting hit with foreclosures, yet. But I didn’t know we had the same thing that NJ has, an exit tax to leave the state. At least we aren’t upside down with a 30 year fixed, no funny loan stuff for us. We had been upside down in our condo for years, glad we got out of that. This market would be terrible for condo’s.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.