Liberal blogs and Instapundit were quick to dismiss the theory that the latest round of blog shutdowns had anything to do with the Obama camp. At least one did.
1 posted on
08/03/2008 6:31:26 AM PDT by
mondoreb
To: mondoreb
2 posted on
08/03/2008 6:34:27 AM PDT by
counterpunch
(John McCain - For the LOVE of Country)
To: mondoreb
Hah, you think this is bad just wait until this jackass gets elected with a democrat majority congress.
3 posted on
08/03/2008 6:36:10 AM PDT by
randomhero97
("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
To: mondoreb
I've never been to a "blog," so know little about them.
Seems to me the DOS thing is a double edge sword. Does barackobama.com want to open that can of worms?
4 posted on
08/03/2008 6:38:26 AM PDT by
ASA Vet
To: mondoreb
Will this story be publicized? Wait, that was on "Final Jepoardy" last light...
5 posted on
08/03/2008 6:40:16 AM PDT by
Old Sarge
(CTHULHU '08 - I won't settle for a lesser evil any longer!)
To: mondoreb
My blog has a simple graphic on it...and it was taken out yesterday for a while.
Here's the graphic: 
6 posted on
08/03/2008 6:50:08 AM PDT by
kimmie7
(<<<---- Too surly for the hoarde.)
To: mondoreb
The IP address in question; 66.39.4.254 66.39.143.229 216.146.206.181, are all registered via “Go Daddy” under the name barackobama.com.
They suuuuuuuuuuuure are.
- IP 66.39.4.254
IP address state: Pennsylvania
IP address city: Pittsburgh
Host of this IP: www3.barackobama.com Whois:
Registrant:
Obama for America,
233 N. Michigan Ave, Suite 1100, Chicago, Illinois 60601
Administrative Contact:
Admin, Admin admin@barackobama.com
Obama for America,
233 N. Michigan Ave, Suite 1100, Chicago, Illinois 60601, ph: 312-819-2008
Technical Contact:
Admin, Admin admin@barackobama.com
Obama for America,
233 N. Michigan Ave, Suite 1100, Chicago, Illinois 60601, ph: 312-819-2008
- IP 66.39.143.229
All same as above, except: Host of this IP: www2.barackobama.com
- 216.146.206.181
same as above, except: Host of this IP: barackobama.com
Someone's not 'playing nice'. Then again, when have Marxists ever 'played nice'?
9 posted on
08/03/2008 7:52:32 AM PDT by
Condor51
(I have guns in my nightstand because a Cop won't fit)
To: mondoreb
I know Michelle Malkin and at least one other I visited Friday were not readable.
Total domination by Obamabots. Dissent is not allowed. They think themselves the Borg.
11 posted on
08/03/2008 9:03:53 AM PDT by
combat_boots
(She lives! 22 weeks, 9.5 inches. Go, baby, go!)
To: mondoreb
12 posted on
08/03/2008 9:06:28 AM PDT by
lowbridge
("I have never learned to fight for my freedom. I was only good at enjoying it" - Van Den Boogaard)
To: mondoreb
A DOS flood is different from filing complaints with Google to get blogs shut down as spam.
If there was a real DOS flood coming from an Obama website, it may qualify as a federal crime. May — it could be misconfigured tool designed to pull data from opponent websites to keep tabs on what they are saying.
To: mondoreb
14 posted on
08/03/2008 9:14:49 AM PDT by
lowbridge
("I have never learned to fight for my freedom. I was only good at enjoying it" - Van Den Boogaard)
To: mondoreb; Pride in the USA; Stillwaters
Will this story be publicized? In a word, no.
18 posted on
08/03/2008 10:12:16 AM PDT by
lonevoice
(John McCain was a Kinoki foot pad in the Reagan Revolution)
To: nnn0jeh
31 posted on
08/04/2008 12:05:43 AM PDT by
kalee
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
