To: 2ndDivisionVet
Not a bad article, but he may have one thing wrong. I believe it will cost him the nomination, not the election.
2 posted on
07/31/2008 10:41:54 PM PDT by
Ingtar
(Haley Barbour 2012, Because he has experience in Disaster Recovery. - ejonesie22)
To: Ingtar
"Not a bad article, but he may have one thing wrong. I believe it will cost him the nomination, not the election." Do you think Obama would still run for president as an independent if he somehow lost the nomination? He probably has enough money to, if that's legal.
I don't think anyone has considered this possibility, however remote it may be.
To: Ingtar
I'm with you, Obama hasn't got the nomination yet and everyone seems to be forgetting that Hillary HAS NOT released her delegates and has only suspended her campaign. Then when you realize that Hill and Bill have been far too quiet lately, all I can say is time will tell and the Democratic convention is coming up.
31 posted on
07/31/2008 11:18:37 PM PDT by
kagnew
To: Ingtar
Not a bad article, but he may have one thing wrong. I believe it will cost him the nomination, not the election.Shall we rename Denver to "Kindling, Co" or just bring marshmallows to the DNC convention?
60 posted on
08/01/2008 2:09:56 AM PDT by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: Ingtar
I believe it will cost him the nomination, not the election.
If it costs him the nomination, it will cost him the election; unless, of course, you're suggesting he'll be a winner of the election via write-in votes.
65 posted on
08/01/2008 3:27:04 AM PDT by
aruanan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson