Posted on 07/31/2008 11:14:20 AM PDT by djsherin
The housing bill signed Wednesday by President George W. Bush will provide a stream of billions of dollars for distressed homeowners and communities and the nonprofit groups that serve them.
The housing bill signed Wednesday by President George W. Bush will provide a stream of billions of dollars for distressed homeowners and communities and the nonprofit groups that serve them.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
Carolyn
Does this "nonprofit" thing irk anyone besides me?
I get calls from people who say, "We're a nonprofit."
I tell them they must live with the consequences of their choice.
Can I assume that ACORN is involved in some fashion?
I'm thinking said "stream of billions" for "communities" (rather, community organizers like Obama) and "nonprofit groups that serve them," (like ACORN), the militant socialistic agitators that do nothing but try to intimidate liberal politicians into giving them still more ridiculous handouts as un-American wealth re-distribution!!!
I just didn't get it posted fast enough...
....the militant socialistic agitators that do nothing but try to intimidate liberal politicians into giving them still more .....
I think this statment is incorrect. Acorn does do something besides intimidate. The militant socialistic agitators at Acorn have one of their own running for President. That is pretty serious action
The housing gambler bailout bill of stupidity. Well I better start putting in some overtime. I’ve just had “provide housing gamblers caught upsidedown on their investment a bailout” to my job description.
I heard Pelosi wants another stimlus check given to all of the US as well. Since I apperantly was stupid enough to educate myself and bust my ass to increase my salary every year (Appears thats the mark of a loser in the US now), I didn’t qualify for one, but sorry everyone else, I’ll start putting in some more overtime to fund it all too.
Well, I’m quite glad you put the proper exclamation mark on that sentence! Thank you!!!
http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/2008/07/big-bailout-america-as-full-spectrum.html
Its name somewhat anachronistically means “assembly of old men.” George Washington famously — and, it must now be admitted, with excessive optimism — characterized it as an institutional saucer intended to cool legislation passed in the intemperate heat of the moment. Its members demand, with entirely unwarranted self-approval, to be called, collectively, the World’s Greatest Deliberative Body.
Sober observers understand it to be the most corrupt legislative assembly in human history. To those characterizations of the United States Senate we must now add another, perhaps the final one: Gravedigger of the republic.
With the Senate’s passage of the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac bailout last Saturday (July 26), the United States of America has now become the world’s first full-service kleptocracy, a form of government described earlier in this space as a government of, by, and for the robbers.
We are supposed to pretend to believe that the Senate, so great was its anxiety over the nation’s economically distressed homeowners, met in a rare Saturday session for the sole purpose of administering the balm of Gilead on hardworking families who confront the bleak prospect of foreclosure.
There may be people who believe such a thing, or at least profess to do so. They are pretty much the kind of people who believe that peace, prosperity, and progress will magically ensue after next January 20, when the Holy One, Barack Obama (peace be upon him) ascends to the presidency, not astride a White Horse, but rather mounted upon a flying unicorn that emits healing rainbows from its butt.
No, it’s not the travails of the productive that would earn such attention from the Senate. When the Senate sacrifices so much as a minute of its down time, it does so not to relieve our burdens, but to add to them in the interest of their fellow parasites.
Thieves in suits, the private sector version....
When Congress created the Federal Reserve in 1913, it did so in a lame-duck session. The Fed’s proponents described its handiwork as an independent entity that would prevent “panics” and maintain the integrity of our currency and financial system.
The Fed was presented to the public in pseudo-populist drag: It was supposedly the bane of the big banking interests. This was, in every particular, a conscious inversion of the truth. The Fed was, is, and every shall be a product and protector of those interests. It has practically destroyed the value of US currency, and engineered numerous financial crises, including the one currently unfolding.
The measure passed last Saturday is being described to the public as a “homeowner” bailout. It is nothing of the sort. It supposedly creates an independent oversight mechanism to rein in the excesses of Fannie and Freddie. This, too, is an unalloyed falsehood.
Let us disambiguate the key issue right now. This is a measure to nationalize Fannie and Freddie, plundering the population at large — through direct taxation, the more insidious tax called inflation, or both — to bail out two fascist entities that have been used to enrich the politically connected super-rich through the most corrupt means imaginable.
Furthermore, this measure prefigures the eventual nationalization of the entire financial system under the supervision of an executive branch official with practically unlimited power to appropriate and allocate funds without congressional action. OK, sure, he has to file a report with Congress regarding his expenditures. But this takes place after the fact, and Congress will be able to do nothing but complain, if it can bestir itself even to that extent.
Thieves in more expensive suits, the public sector version: The Senate Democratic leadership. The Republicans, of course, are just as bad, if not worse.
Congress has yielded its war powers to the executive branch. It has now effectively surrendered the power of the purse, as well. What, then, remains by way of the legislative branch’s ability to check the executive?
Nobody responsible for this is willing to admit that truth; they’re too busy taking refuge in contrived ambiguities.
The figure sent out to pollute headlines and palliate a nervous public last week was that fixing Fannie and Freddie will cost “at least” $25 billion. That’s a bit like saying there are “at least” 25 gallons of water in Lake Michigan.
The Congressional Budget Office, in an artful display of tactical equivocation, said that the bailout could cost anything from $100 billion down to “nothing.” That latter estimate would be dismissed as magic thinking were it not a transparent and cynical effort to propagate such delusion among that part of the public paying attention to the ongoing economic collapse.
As the Wall Street Journal summarized, the $25 billion figure was arrived by following a time-honored government accounting algorithm: Some accountant at the CBO threw a dart at the wall. In fact, the bailout measure places in the hands of Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson the discretionary authority to pour as much money into Fannie and Freddie as he deems necessary. He can extend an unlimited credit line to either or both of those government-chartered companies; he can use federal funds to buy shares in either, or both.
There is no limit to what can be spent on the bailout, or the extent of government involvement it will entail. In his efforts to lobby congressional Republicans on behalf of the bailout, Paulson reportedly assured them that he has “no intention” of using those extraordinary powers. This means, of course, that they will be used immediately. It also means, inevitably, that Fannie and Freddie will be nationalized, and that taxpayers will pay the full burden of the bailout.
Senate Republicans — clap-torn whores, every one of them — put up a show of reluctance, perhaps because the White House likes a little role-playing action of that sort. This meant that Treasury Secretary Paulson had to convene several meetings with Republicans in order to pretend to overcome their reluctance to support a measure that will impecuniate their constituents in order to pay off the imponderably huge bad debts assumed by politically protected thieves.
The Fannie/Freddie bailout is another example of the familiar equation behind corporatism (or, to use the more loaded synonym, fascism): The risks are subsidized, the losses are socialized, and the profits are privatized.
There are former corporate executives who spend their days looking at striped sunlight and showing with their backs to the wall for crimes identical to those of former Fannie CEO Franklin D. Raines and his comrades. But because Raines and his posse used a Government-Sponsored Entity to commit their crimes, they’re free to enjoy nearly all the fruits of their fraud.
The Great Poker Face, he ain’t: Paulson looks on in visible alarm as his dimwitted boss pontificates on the supposed health of the US economy.
I find it remarkable that next to nothing has been said by way of condemning Raines and his fellow corporatist thieves.
Doing so is nearly as unthinkable as permitting those two government-sponsored companies to fail, as they should.
According to former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, the bailout wouldn’t be necessary if people were willing to do their part by throwing their money away without the government forcing them to do so: “Emergency legislation was necessary because market participants were unwilling to buy Fannie and Freddie’s debt; investors doubted that the government-sponsored enterprises were healthy enough to repay it and did not draw sufficient reassurance from the implicit guarantee of federal support.” This is why, according to Summers, “Anyone who cares about the health of the US economy should welcome the ... rescue plan for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac....”
Quick quiz: What’s the difference between a common armed robber (such as this convenience store bandit), and the Federal Reserve? The first steals money from the cash register; the second steals the value of the money in the cash register.
Imagine an armed robber lecturing his victim that it wouldn’t have been “necessary” to threaten the victim’s life, and the lives of his family, if they had simply handed over their money on demand, and you’ll have a suitable moral parallel to the statement above. Eventually — and for that, read “pretty damn soon” — the entire daisy-chain of fraud we call our financial system will devolve into a scene of violent chaos akin to the denouement of Reservoir Dogs, only immeasurably bigger and unimaginably bloodier.
Already, the robber’s pact holding the system together is starting to fray, as fractional reserve banks start gagging on each other’s IOUs. Witness the fact that cashier’s checks being issued by California’s newly federalized IndyMac bank aren’t being honored by other banks: Customers who cash out of IndyMac are finding that they won’t be able to access their funds for up to two months. It’s not difficult to imagine the impact this will have on households who expected to use those funds to make mortgage or tax payments, or have other irrepressible financial needs.
It took roughly a tithe of FDIC’s deposit insurance fund to bail out IndyMac. Last week’s bank failures — First National Bank of Nevada and Arizona’s First Heritage Bank — involved combined assets of about $3.6 billion.
With Wachovia, Washington Mutual, and many other major banks primed to blow, the day will soon come when — in the words of James Kunstler — the FDIC will simply “choke and croak on this wad of losses.... When American depositors get screwed out of their deposits” — as they already are; vide the observation above regarding IndyMac’s dodgy cashier’s checks — “the full force of the fiasco will drag the dollar underwater like the legendary Kraken of old preying on a babe thrown overboard. Then the forces of darkness will really be loosed.”
Last week, Congress went on record regarding its priorities: With a handful of noble exceptions (conspicuous among them the stalwart Rep. Ron Paul of Texas), they demonstrated a willingness to ruin what remains of the dollar and destroy the Middle Class in order to rescue — temporarily — the uber-rich Robber Class.
The people responsible for this betrayal will be campaigning in their districts during the coming weeks. It would be instructive to them, and may be heartening to their victims, to see at least a few of them on the receiving end of timely and forceful rebukes, delivered in language — and other expressive conduct — appropriate to the occasion, and prevailing security environment.
Not just ACORN. La Raza, and hundreds of other lefty groups run these programs.
Legislators moan about earmarks and then pass a monstrosity like this without blinking an eye.
¢#%¥!@¡£¤s!
We have such a wonderful government. Imagine that. With the snap of fingers we can generate stream of billions of dollars whenever we need them.
I have some of these GovernMental parasitic "Not For Profit" groups housed right here in my office building!!!
Whatever your enterprise, it becomes instantly sanctified in the minds of government lovers who normally think the private profit making sector is evil and it's government's prime directive to control it through regulation and litigation!!!
Classic example of this is when CALPERS hooked up with a "Not For Profit" non-insurance company that established a plan to pay for Long-Term Care just like private profit making sector insurance companies. The element of regulation which is crushing in the private sector was not required for this CALPERS "program" because it wasn't even "insurance" at all!
They told the public employees at all levels of government in CA that they and their families could enroll at lower prices than "outside" insurance companies because they were a "Not For Profit" corporation.
It didn't matter that they were DUPLICATING almost every aspect of what the normal insurance industry was doing and finally, just a couple of years ago they announced a humeongus rate increase that now makes their "program" completely uncompetitive with private sector, heavily regulated normal "insurance companies!"
So... A program that competed directly against companies I represent and lied about being cheaper because of being "Not For Profit," ended up screwing all these governmental employees because they didn't ever rate (price), or reserve properly and finally were forced to face the "Truth or Consequences!" Most had to settle for reduced benefits to continue at even near the same rate they'd always paid.
The point is... These government lovers STILL believe that a Non-Profit entity is next unto a holy governmental agency in trustworth honesty and sanctity as opposed to the evil private sector and it's representative agents and lobbyists!!!
ping
Public school education. What a grand thing. :-(
Well, I’ve never been “served” by a non-profit group.
How about you, SierraWasp?
I recently had a thundering herd of fat welfare mommas and their drunk boyfriends vote to raise my property taxes to pay for multi-million dollar boondoggles at the local school/indoctrination centers. Does that count?
Wull, yeah! If yer talkin 'bout the blind, deaf and dumb continuin to screw themselves without any lovin, whilst causin you to be screwed too, because of their lamentable ignorance and stupidity!!!
Curse 'em one, curse 'em all... The long, the short and the TALL!!! But... GOD BLESS AMERICA!!! (some way or another)
I said years ago that when this stupid housing bubble busts that government would try to take the repos and turn them into low cost housing and it appears like it’s starting to happen.
Giving housing to people that don’t deserve it or appreciate it as a legitamate owner would.
Which causes them to neglect them and ruin them and discard them because they have neither any skin in the game and certainly no normal pride of ownership!!!
It's "giving a man a fish," rather than "teaching him how to fish!" And it's dyed in the wool LIBERALISM!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.