Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC: McCain “now seriously considering” Lieberman for VP
Hot Air ^ | 7/30/08 | Allahpundit

Posted on 07/30/2008 6:57:53 PM PDT by pissant

He’s going to transform the party — by turning us into hawkish Democrats? Nuance.

There’s a bigger point — and this initial volley, they say, lays the groundwork for it. They will be sharpening McCain’s message that he, not Obama, is the true change agent, a man who’s repeatedly taken unpopular stands, made the hard calls and forged bipartisan alliances.

Part of the calculus now is how his VP choice will further sharpen that message. There is significant support among top McCain advisers that he make a “transformative” pick who would change the Republican Party — someone who would appeal to moderate Republicans and Democrats…

A person who fills that bill, these advisers say, is Joe Lieberman.

Lieberman, an Independent Democrat, flatly denied his interest to ABC’s Ron Claiborne earlier this month, but McCain is now seriously considering him as that “transformative” pick, sources tell ABC News…

What’s more, some McCain advisers believe Lieberman would dramatically enhance the point they are now trying to make about Obama in this “celebrity” ad campaign.

McCain and Lieberman are anti-celebrities, the argument goes. They have, as one top adviser said, felt the heat after taking unpopular positions because they were willing to do “what’s right for the country” — whatever it meant for their own popularity.

Good news for that unpredictable five percent in the middle he needs to win, not so good for, er, everyone else in America. Are evangelicals going to vote for a guy who scored 100% on NARAL’s annual report card? Are Reagan conservatives jittery about McCain’s maverickiness going to feel reassured knowing Al Gore’s choice for VP is waiting in the wings? Is the left going to reach hitherto unscaled heights of apoplexy at the thought of the one pol they hate more than George Bush somehow ending up on the Republican ticket? (No, no, and yes, respectively, if you’re scoring at home.) Think of it in practical terms. Assume the worst happens and through some misfortune Vice President Lieberman becomes President Lieberman. Either the Democrats’ animus towards him results in hopeless gridlock in Congress or the breach is healed and we’ve got a lefty executive working with a lefty legislature towards common goals — Iraq excepted, of course. I like Liebs; I don’t like the idea. But the signs are there if you’re willing to look…

Exit question: Maybe the left, true to its proud tradition of honoring dissent, will forgive Joementum his apostasy? Hmmm.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008veep; joementum; lieberman; mccain; mccainlist; mccaintruthfile; poorpoorrinos; rino; transformative; veep2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-198 last
To: pissant
“now seriously considering” Lieberman for VP

Been there, done that, got the tee shirt. Literally.

Photobucket

181 posted on 07/31/2008 4:12:35 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty2007
"I would rather Obama wins. That’s the only way to give some of you people a spine"

I agree, however I am hoping that something occurs before November and we get another Canidate.

182 posted on 07/31/2008 4:18:56 AM PDT by DeaconRed (NO BOMA NO TIME--NO RINO NO TIME--- WE WOULD BE BETTER OFF WITH NUTIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: pissant

And the American National Socialist Party reported that ABC will erect a statue of Hitler in its lobby.

ABC puts out this crap just to irritate us.


183 posted on 07/31/2008 5:54:33 AM PDT by sergeantdave (We are entering the Age of the Idiot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

The perfect fit. Two two time liberal losers in Presidential races match up to take on the Obamessiah as “agents of change”. ***snicker***


184 posted on 07/31/2008 6:24:23 AM PDT by TADSLOS (Cure CINOism- Write in proven conservatives at all levels on the ballot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MARTIAL MONK
I think the rabble has been roused.

Love that line!

I'm a writer - I may 'borrow' that! ;o)

185 posted on 07/31/2008 7:11:24 AM PDT by maine-iac7 (No trees were killed in sending this message but a large number of electrons were terrible agitated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Voter#537
I agree, however I am hoping that something occurs before November and we get another Canidate.

Oh yeah I really wish that would happen too, too bad I am not at home to help out with a convention disturbance :p

186 posted on 07/31/2008 7:28:12 AM PDT by Liberty2007 (Here's Dr. Savage's analysis on the POTUS race"The Afro-Leninist vs The Sarcophogus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

All yours.


187 posted on 07/31/2008 7:57:06 AM PDT by MARTIAL MONK (I'm waiting for the POP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

“There is no way the Senate can keep it perpetual until they get who they want in the office of appointing.”

We are talking about McCAIN and DEMOCRATS. He will do what he does, work with them and screw America.


188 posted on 07/31/2008 8:40:54 AM PDT by Grunthor (Libs love soccer because you can play for hours and have no winner, thus no loser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

“Most important thing is to win the war on terror.”

NOT according to the electorate.


189 posted on 07/31/2008 8:41:49 AM PDT by Grunthor (Libs love soccer because you can play for hours and have no winner, thus no loser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: pissant
ABC: McCain “now seriously considering” Lieberman for VP

Since he's jonesing so badly for someone's sloppy seconds, he should consider Walter Mondale.

190 posted on 07/31/2008 8:49:39 AM PDT by E. Cartman (I didn't leave The GOP. The GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NOBAMA in 08
McCain/Lieberman UUUUUKKKK! The KISS of Boring Antiques, each can put you to sleep faster than a bottle of AMBIEN! Please tell alll this is a wild butt rumor being started by the Idiot Dodd.:-)

McCain needs anyone who'll make him look young and vital. Jesse Helms and Strom Thurmond immediately come to mind.

191 posted on 07/31/2008 8:51:42 AM PDT by E. Cartman (I didn't leave The GOP. The GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor; MinorityRepublican
“Most important thing is to win the war on terror.”

Thank you, MinorityRepublican. And will that ever be the case? WOT could go on forever....so.....I guess we are to sit back, vote for lefty R's, accept illegal immigration, pay for GW, higher SS payroll taxes, curtail free speech etc.

Gee all of that in order to win a war that may go on forever.

As long as we vote to move the country left and accept it, we will have nothing left to save or win. Where does it stop? The same argument will be made 4 years from now as usual.

192 posted on 07/31/2008 8:52:11 AM PDT by dforest (I had almost forgotten that McCain is the nominee. Too bad I was reminded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: pissant

If true, it may be time for Consrvatives to leave the Pubbies to their insanity and form a third party.


193 posted on 07/31/2008 1:02:21 PM PDT by webschooner (Bumper Sticker: "None of the Above, 2008")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty2007
I cant help ...

I understand. However I would urge you to reconsider. McCain will be far better on many issues - Iraq, WoT, military, taxes and SC justices. That's enough for me.

194 posted on 07/31/2008 4:10:44 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Finny
You make some fair points. Even so, I have a bit different emphasis. So I will try to address a few of the points you made:

If our nation has reached that fragile point [that it is immensely important that Sen. Obama is defeated], we're done for anyway.

It's really hard to argue with that. I would just say that we appear, indeed, to be in a state of national decline; and that is a pretty fragile state. And although national decline, like death and taxes, is inevitable, it can certainly be postponed. I think Sen. McCain (acting in the capacity of President McCain) would be much better equipped--from the standpoints of judgment, temperament, courage, and philosophical leanings--to arrest that decline, however temporarily, than the junior senator from Illinois would be.

There's a chance with Obama because Obama is NOT a grown-up and the world and America would know it and resent it, no matter what the media does. He would likely be unpopular fast, and divisive, because so many Democrats dislike him. I think there's a pretty good chance this nation can survive Obama, who would be a one-term guy.

You could be correct in this analysis. I am unwilling, however, to predicate America's fate upon this assumption. So many Democrats are viscerally anti-Republican (in fact, rabidly so) that they would continue to support a squishy Europhile--and enthusiastically so--as he proclaimed an updated version of "Peace in our time," a la Neville Chamberlain.

The operative question, really, is whether independents--the all-important "swing" voters--would grow weary of a President Obama in sufficient numbers to render him a one-term wonder. And on this matter, I confess that I really do not know what to expect.

There isn't any chance that this nation can survive Liberalism.

In the long term, that is certainly true. Liberalism, as the term is typically used today (which is not to be confused with its older usage, as in "liberal democracy") is merely a euphemism for social democracy--which, in turn, is a euphemism for democratic socialism. And socialism, even in its least malignant form (I will not call it a "benign" form; it is not), is unsustainable, over the long term. Which is why most European welfare states are already in deep fiscal trouble.

But the most immediate threat with which we are faced is not socialism--its corrosive effects and inherent unworkability take awhile to become fully apparent--but Islamofascism, whether of the Sunni variety (think: al-Qaeda) or the Shiite variety (e.g. the mullahs in Tehran). And I simply cannot imagine a President Obama facing down these threats in a determined and courageous manner. I believe he would more likely become introspective, and ask himself what America had done to create such hatred among these people; and then he would take whatever steps he thought necessary to mollify them.

A President McCain, on the other hand, would not be likely to be seduced by such blame-America-first thinking, in my opinion.

195 posted on 07/31/2008 9:59:12 PM PDT by AmericanExceptionalist (Democrats believe in discussing the full spectrum of ideas, all the way from far left to center-left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan

No, no, no!

In order to prove his competence... McCain must *AHEM!* a woman!

:-P


196 posted on 08/01/2008 6:11:57 PM PDT by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: gogogodzilla

Good Grief, two old really white men. That’s exciting!


197 posted on 08/01/2008 6:24:09 PM PDT by Chickensoup ('08 VOTING, NOT for the GOP, but INSTEAD, for the SUPREME COURT that will be BEST for my FAMILY!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
But what good would it do him?
McCain is trying to build a new Republican coalition that spans the middle of American politics. Let's face it, if you're looking for new voters you aren't going to find them on either the far left or the far right. He is banking on the fact that conservatives will vote for him no matter what even if it means they are voting against the other guy. And with Obama as the Democratic nominee he is probably correct in assuming that.

If McCain wins with the moderate strategy he has consistently used so far then he will have fundamentally changed the Republican presidential formula much the same as Reagan did. Especially if he wins decisively. Future candidates will work to unite the McCain coalition in the middle. He knows he won the Republican nomination in spite of conservatives and not as a result of them.

In addition to his core beliefs, McCain is probably looking at some cold hard political facts. Bush won without the popular vote in 2000, his reelection majority was especially narrow in 2004, the Pubs never had large majorities in Congress, and they lost Congress in 2006. He sees the need to ride a new horse with more popular support.

Whether that's what's good for the country is another matter. But look at his strategy so far and tell me he's not doing that.

198 posted on 08/27/2008 2:47:36 PM PDT by 21stCenturyFreeThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-198 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson