Posted on 07/27/2008 11:10:43 PM PDT by Red Steel
On Sunday's This Week, ABC's George Stephanopoulos condemned John McCain for charging that “Senator Obama would rather lose a war in order to win a political campaign.” Stephanopoulos, who interviewed McCain on Saturday at his Arizona ranch, declared: “I can't believe you believe that.” McCain insisted “I'm not questioning his patriotism. I'm questioning his actions. I'm questioning his lack, total lack of understanding,” leading Stephanopoulos to counter: “But that is questioning his patriotism. When you say someone would rather lose a war, a candidate, that's questioning his honor, his decency, his character.”
As McCain continued to defend his assessment, Stephanopoulos kept rejecting his reasoning (“So putting lives at risk for a political campaign, you believe he's doing that?”) and excoriating his characterization of Obama: “But you're questioning his motives.”
Stephanopoulos matched a theme pushed on Wednesday's World News by ABC reporter David Wright. My July 23 NewsBusters item recounted:
Wright began his interview with McCain by scolding him for his “extraordinary statement” that “Obama would rather lose a war in order to win a political campaign.” Wright demanded: “Do you really think he's that craven?” Wright also lectured: “But what you seem to be saying there is that it's all about personal ambition for him and not about what he honestly thinks is right for the country.”
The exchange on the Sunday, July 27 This Week in the interview taped the day before in Arizona, with McCain's dogs walking around them at least once:
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: You've taken heat this week with your comments saying that Senator Obama would rather lose a war than win a political campaign. I can't believe you believe that.
JOHN McCAIN: Well, I'm not questioning his patriotism. I'm questioning his actions. I'm questioning his lack, total lack of understanding.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But that is questioning his patriotism. When you say someone would rather lose a war, a candidate, that's questioning his honor, his decency, his character.
McCAIN: All I'm say something is, and I will repeat, he does not understand. I'm not questioning his patriotism. I am saying that he made the decision which was political in order to help him get the nomination.
STEPHANOPOULOS: So putting lives at risk for a political campaign, you believe he's doing that?
McCAIN: I believe that when he said that we had to leave Iraq and we had to be out by last March and we had to have a date certain, that was in contravention to and still is to the Chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, General David Petraeus. When he never asked to sit down for a briefing with General Petraeus, our commander on the ground, when he waited 900 days to go back again where young American lives are on the line, I think that's a fundamental lack of understanding and I think the American people will make the appropriate choices.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But you're questioning his motives.
McCAIN: I say that it was very clear that a decision had to be made, and I made it when it wasn't popular. He made a decision which was popular with his base, and that is a fundamental difference and he does not understand and did not understand and still doesn't understand that the surge was the vital strategy in us not having to lose a war, chaos, genocide, increased influence of Iranians in the region, the consequences of failure would have been severe. Now the benefits are enormous of a stable ally in the region, of a country that is a friend of ours, a break on Iranian influence, certainly a break on al Qaeda and other jihadist organizations. So he made the decision that that was the best way to go to get the nomination of his party.
‘Bout time for McCain to go for the jugular! I just hope he doesn’t back down on this later. Good for him.
Stephanopoulos knows its true.
When it comes to interviews, John McCain is no John Bolton.
I can’t believe George Stephanopoulos is that naïve. And I don’t.
Dang, I’d say McCain about nailed that one. Stephi was obviously angry and appalled and tried to nail him to the wall. However, McCain was able to articulate his position and draw the contrast out even more.
Craven political player vs. wise leader able to make tough choices.
The contrast in character and judgement just keeping showing up, deeper and richer every day.
McCain nails it in one.
I have to agree with Stephanopoulos when he says that McCain is questioning Obama’s motives. That seems to be exactly what McCain is doing.
So am I.
He has only promised to end the war. Stephy knows this. If Obama does not plan on losing, then perhaps he should elaborate on exactly how he would win, not just end, the war.
You got that right! And tell me again, why we're running John McCain instead of John Bolton......
“I’ve come to believe that he needs a certain level of violence in this country. He’s willing to accept a certain level of killing to further his political agenda and his vice president, too.” LA PIERRE on CLINTON
Oh how I recall the Media FRENZY!
Because John Bolton will be the next SecState. (Don’t dash my optimism here...)
I’ve never heard Obama say he wants us to win.
‘To anger a conservative, tell a lie;
To anger a liberal, tell the truth.’
Steffie worked for a president who started an unwinnable, pointless war to take the public’s mind off his adultery. I wish McCain had said that to his face.
We are running John McCain because he is a Great Leader and a Great American and John Bolton is a good follower and good mid level Diplomat. And WE are telling You again as You have requested because obviously You just dont get it yet!
Since McCain is the "presumptive" and almost a done deal, maybe he could choose Bolton for VP- but that's highly wishful thinking. Sec State would be great. America greatly needs a white male heterosexual SecState.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.