Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Explosion.

747.

"Passengers spoke of hearing a loud bang and debris flying into the first class cabin as the plane’s flooring gave way,"

"the incident was not related to terrorism."

1 posted on 07/25/2008 12:59:54 PM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: null and void

Nothing to see here, move along....Lockerbie anyone?


2 posted on 07/25/2008 1:01:03 PM PDT by RadioCirca1970 (Welcome to the Terror Dome....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Metal fatigue at the wing root.


3 posted on 07/25/2008 1:03:38 PM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
But Mr Learmount, who is Safety Editor at Flight International Magazine, stressed the hole could also have been caused by a weakened hull, causing the belly of the plane to give way.

Really!!!

4 posted on 07/25/2008 1:04:36 PM PDT by Bahbah (Typical white person-Snow white)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
Good thing they fixed those center fuel tanks years ago.
5 posted on 07/25/2008 1:06:19 PM PDT by McGruff ( 'the U.S. Senate Banking Committee, which is my committee' - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

interesting that the United States was not even involved, yet the TSA felt compelled to chime in that it wasn’t terrorism, practically before the plane had stopped rolling.


6 posted on 07/25/2008 1:06:26 PM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Over pressurization of the luggage area? The forensic people will check for residue if it was an explosion....


9 posted on 07/25/2008 1:09:31 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("What Our Enemies Couldn't Do Our Politicians Will")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
 

Oh really??

The US Transportation Security Administration said initial reports show the incident was not related to terrorism.

 

13 posted on 07/25/2008 1:12:59 PM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Could be metal fatigue...


14 posted on 07/25/2008 1:18:31 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
I hate flying. While this incident is different, our plane had to abort landing (TWICE) at Charles de Gaulle in Paris this spring because of high winds. It was terrifying. I just can't imagine what those folks went through.

CC&E

16 posted on 07/25/2008 1:21:18 PM PDT by Calm_Cool_and_Elected (So many books, so little time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

any passengers with connections to Whitewater or Vince Foster? (I’m keeeeeeding......)


23 posted on 07/25/2008 1:30:53 PM PDT by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

any passengers with connections to Whitewater or Vince Foster? (I’m keeeeeeding......)


24 posted on 07/25/2008 1:30:54 PM PDT by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
INVESTIGATORS should be able to quickly pinpoint the basic reason behind the Qantas plane’s emergency landing in the Philippines, aviation experts said today.
They might want to consider starting from a fairly reasonable presumption -- the basic reason behind the emergency landing may have had a little something to do with the gaping hole in the side of the airplane. Sheesh!!
25 posted on 07/25/2008 1:31:20 PM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

“the plane reportedly plunged 20,000ft.”

They say this like the incident cause the plane to lost its ability to stay aloft, and was in danger of crashing. Undoubtedly, the pilot followed standard procedure to calmly and deliberately fly the plane to a much lower altitude where the air is thicker, and oxygen masks are not needed.

No “plunging” involved.


26 posted on 07/25/2008 1:33:04 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Guns don't kill people, criminals and the governments that create them do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: milford421; Calpernia; Velveeta; DAVEY CROCKETT

Ping.


27 posted on 07/25/2008 1:34:09 PM PDT by nw_arizona_granny ( http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1990507/posts?page=451 SURVIVAL, RECIPES, GARDENS, & INFO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

I remember seeing retired passenger aircraft in the AMARC at Davis-Monthan AFB in Tucson that were being retrofitted in the cargo area. They were experimenting on using reinforced containers in the luggage area to allow for bombs to blow out the side of the aircraft, but not allow the blast to destroy or blow into the aircraft. Basically enough to allow the plane to land. This was in the early 90s.


28 posted on 07/25/2008 1:35:23 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
"the incident was not related to terrorism."

That's the standard line, even when they are clueless as to the cause.

31 posted on 07/25/2008 1:41:10 PM PDT by isrul (Help make every day, "Disrespect a muzzie day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

“Folks, this is your Captain....”


34 posted on 07/25/2008 1:45:46 PM PDT by wolfcreek (I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Holes don’t appear in jets without an explosion, so I would venture that an explosion is a good guess. And it was coming from London, Heathrow, wasn’t it?


40 posted on 07/25/2008 2:09:46 PM PDT by Boagenes (I'm your huckleberry, that's just my game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Maybe the auto-pilot was overinflated...


42 posted on 07/25/2008 2:16:38 PM PDT by meyer (...by any means necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
Just looking at some other pictures on the Internet and taking a good educated guess I'll say it was one thing led to another, first the sheet metal panel came off, and then the next layer was breached.

My first guess is that wing wasn't attached as good as it should be. I noticed the first sheet metal layer pretty much came off as a whole unit except for a small pieces toward the front and up aways, . I think if it was an explosion, it would of punched a hole through the sheet metal instead of taking the whole panel off.

My second thought is that this panel could of been taken off for maintenance at one time and never put back in place properly with the correct screws, rivets, etc, or the screws, rivets, etc are not holding up, but I would hope the second layer would be able to hold. Never the less what ever the cause I'm sure the pajamas patrol will reveal more out of this event then they will want to admit.

48 posted on 07/25/2008 3:27:52 PM PDT by ReformedBeckite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson