[clee1]

The problem is that the econuts all want us to go back to an agrarian, 19th century existance.

Sorry, nutcases... you can’t go back to the past without alot of people dying.

[rlmorel]

Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!
Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!
Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!
Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!
Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!
Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!
Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!
Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!
Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!
Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!
Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!
Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!
Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!
Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!
Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!
Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!
Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!
Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!
Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!
Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!
Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!
Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!
Pebble Bed Reactor Technology Bump!

WE NEED IT DEVELOPED, WE NEED LOTS OF IT...

AND WE NEED IT NOW.

[gakrak]

Wind and Solar my A$$. Wind will produce only about 1/2 of 1% of the energy we require and is both unstable and inconsistent to be a solution to our problems. Amen

[steelyourfaith]

... “we simply don’t have time to wait -- we need global-warming solutions that are ready to go now, like wind and solar.”

 

Beam me to Planet Gore !

[chainsaw]

Nuclear is the way to go, but we also need more research into waste reclaimastion. Burying it 1000 feet underground is not the answer.

[SlowBoat407]

We need to declare sanctuary cities for nuclear energy. That way, companies can go in and build reactors without worrying about federal red tape. And if San Francisco is any indicator, the feds won’t touch a sanctuary city.

After all, more people have been killed by illegal immigrants than by nuclear power plants.

Sanctuary for Nukes, NOW!

[Roccus]

Anyone notice that “The China Syndrome” was being re-run on the AMC yesterday? Betcha we see more of it.

[PapaBear3625]

Because, the group explains on its Web site, bringing a nuclear power plant online could take a number of years, and “we simply don’t have time to wait -- we need global-warming solutions that are ready to go now, like wind and solar.”

In a few years we may have battery packs that will make electric cars viable. We will need a greatly increased supply of electricity to run them on

[CMAC51]

Because, the group explains on its Web site, bringing a nuclear power plant online could take a number of years, and “we simply don’t have time to wait -- we need global-warming solutions that are ready to go now, like wind and solar.”

The federal government just place a two year moritorium on permits to build solar facilities on federal lands because the environmental groups claim solar is damaging the environment.

Could this be because solar has actully reached the stage where it can make a meaningful contribution to enery needs and the enviro wacko's don't really want a solution?