Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear Power: Lighting the Future
Townhall.com ^ | 7/24/2008 | Rebecca Hagelin

Posted on 07/24/2008 2:44:26 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: threeoeight

You do have a point. The nuts have a lot of resources at their disposal.

The lead intervenor for the plant I was working in requested the records for all the safety related welds in the plant, including the names of the welders. That cost a couple million to provide.


21 posted on 07/24/2008 6:45:36 AM PDT by wolfpat (If you don't like the Patriot Act, you're really gonna hate Sharia Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: neb52

Out of curiosity, I checked the STP website. I was wrong. They’re going with the General Electric ABWR design for the new reactors.

When I get home from running errands, I’ll check out Comanche Peak’s site.


22 posted on 07/24/2008 7:00:53 AM PDT by wolfpat (If you don't like the Patriot Act, you're really gonna hate Sharia Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wolfpat; rlmorel
The NRC does not have the staff or the regulations needed by the staff to evaluate a proposal to site/build a pebble-bed style reactor. It is the same reason that Dominion switched to the GE design for their new reactor once it became clear that the first try with the Canadian design could not be licensed by the NRC in a reasonable time. The AREVA design, e.g., for Calvert Cliffs, is an evolution of the Westinghouse design and is thus more straightforward for the NRC staff to evaluate.
23 posted on 07/26/2008 6:09:29 PM PDT by sefarkas (Why vote Democrat Lite?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sefarkas

I am talking about moving forward.

We do not have a working design right now...nobody really has a working design that could meet the needs we have right now.

But I think we should start right now, and this is something I would not mind seeing my tax dollars being spent on...get money into R&D.

The concept is not difficult. It is solving the technical problems such as the manufacturing of the pebbles.

We should take the initiative on this away from the Chinese, because as it stands, they are likely to do it before us.

We need this technology developed. It is safe by design and can be made modular.

RIght now, build what we can, but we should work towards the next level.


24 posted on 07/26/2008 8:00:28 PM PDT by rlmorel (Clinging bitterly to Guns and God in Massachusetts...:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
Not pebble bed but the same TRISO fuel type. Burn up the wastes and make a decent profit doing it too. Look at the burnup values 700 GWD/T thats just amazing. This system would solve the Yucca Mt. problem.

http://www.aie.org.au/syd/downloads/DB-MHR%20Presentation.ppt

25 posted on 07/29/2008 5:12:46 PM PDT by JDinAustin (Austinite in the Big D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: clee1
...you can’t go back to the past without alot of people dying.

That's what they truly want, IMO.

26 posted on 07/29/2008 5:15:40 PM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson