Contact your Congress critters to let them know that you are tired of high gas prices.
Posted on 07/23/2008 7:25:11 PM PDT by neverdem
How much more corn starch should you have in your diet?
Go take a flying leap at a rolling donut!
Alcohol is a crappy fuel!
is not
It screwed up California gas and lowered milage and i’m assuming you have never raced with it and from your page it sounds like you’re in Canada, STAY THERE AND DON’T INFECT CALIFORNIA!
I’ve run it in midgets, sprints, champ cars, and unlimited hydros and it’s unfit for street use!
Contact your Congress critters to let them know that you are tired of high gas prices.
So how do you argue with that logic? It’s bad because he says so.
This article doesn’t go deep enough into the BRIBE paid to Perry to do this. He also strong-armed his alma mater because he didn’t like the results of a study that they’d done.
http://www.chron.com/CDA/archives/archive.mpl?id=2008_4592930
What part of my page sounds like canada?
I’m more worried about california infecting the rest of north america...and south as well.
see post 42. THat’s how.
Oops. I meant 43.
i.e. Senator "Greed" Grassley. Putting dollars ahhead of sense.
The figures below are not lying. No matter how you slice it, the greater the percentage of oxygen (and indeed hydrogen) that is present in the fuel, the lower the amount of energy available in the fuel. It is nearly akin to that particular carbon already being burned. Compare, especially, Ethanol with Methanol, which has an even greater percentage (by weight, number) of oxygen already combined.
| Fuel type | MJoules/L | MJoules/kg | . BTU/Imp.gal | . BTU/US.gal |
| Regular Gasoline | 34.8 | 47 | 150,100 | 125,000 |
| Ethanol | 23.5 | 31.1 | 101,600 | 84,600 |
| Methanol | 17.9 | 19.9 | 77,600 | 64,600 |
| Gasohol (10% EtOH) | 33.7 | 145,200 | 120,900 | |
| Diesel | 38.6 | 166,600 | 138,700 | |
| Aviation gasoline | 33.5 | 46.8 | 144,400 | 120,200 |
| Liquified Nat.Gas | 25.3 | 55 | 109,000 | 90,800 |
Contact your Congress critters to let them know that you are tired of high gas prices.
I’m not sure what you are trying to prove. I don’t really care what the BTUs per gallon are. BTUs per pound is slightly useful, but even that is NOT an indicator of engine efficiency or potential power output.
Notice that aviation fuel is less than automotive fuel in your own chart??? Would you care to explain why those dummies in the aviation industry are using an inferior fuel compared to all of us slugs on the ground?/s
The answer is that BTUs per gallon are totally unimportant figures.
Sorry, try again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.