Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Antiwar activists split over Obama's troop plans
McClatchy on Yahoo ^ | 7/22/08 | David Lightman

Posted on 07/22/2008 3:02:45 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON — Barack Obama's plan to build up U.S. forces in Afghanistan while keeping perhaps 50,000 troops in Iraq has triggered a deep rift among antiwar activists, a reminder of the difficult tasking facing the presumptive Democratic nominee as he tries to broaden his appeal.

The Illinois senator wrapped up three days of tours and talks in the war-ravaged nations Tuesday, stressing in a news conference that the "situation in Afghanistan is perilous and urgent" and that "we should not wait any longer" to provide additional troops.

In Iraq , Obama won a tacit Iraqi endorsement of a plan to withdraw U.S. combat troops in 2010, but he also said that he backs leaving a residual force in Iraq to help train military personnel, provide security for U.S. interests and thwart terrorist threats. ...

Some hailed Obama's trip as an important breakthrough.

"So far the trip has been out of the park. It's an enormous moment," declared Eli Pariser , executive director of MoveOn.org, which supports Obama. He hedged about Obama's troop commitments, however: He said he wasn't fully aware of Obama's call for a residual force in Iraq and was trying to get a sense from MoveOn members on their views about Afghanistan .

Sister Simone Campbell , executive director of NETWORK, the national Catholic social justice lobbying group, was less enthusiastic.

"It was a significant step forward," she said, "but it was only a step."

Others were simply annoyed.

Barbra Bearden , spokeswoman for Peace Action, called Obama's comments about Afghanistan "a bit disheartening."

Ian Thompson , lead organizer in Los Angeles for Act Now to Stop War & End Racism, an antiwar group, found Obama's Afghanistan position similar to that of President Bush and presumptive Republican presidential nominee John McCain .

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2008; activists; answer; antiwar; foreignpolicy; iraq; issues; obama; obamasbigadventure; troopplans

1 posted on 07/22/2008 3:02:45 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Obama wants to send more troops.

wow.


2 posted on 07/22/2008 3:04:50 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE toll-free tip hotline 1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRget!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama (R) and Afghan President Hamid Karzai walk at the presidential palace in Kabul July 20, 2008. REUTERS/Afghanistan Presidential Palace/Handout


3 posted on 07/22/2008 3:06:27 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE toll-free tip hotline 1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRget!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Palestinian artist Walid Ayyub makes the final touches on a portrait for US Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama at his shop in the West Bank city of Ramallah. Obama stepped into the maelstrom of the Middle East Tuesday, warning the next US president could not just snap his fingers and make peace, as fresh violence rocked the region. (AFP/Abbas Momani)


4 posted on 07/22/2008 3:10:09 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE toll-free tip hotline 1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRget!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The antiwar activists can be forgiven. Their views aren’t that much different than Obama’s are they. He’s also split on what his actual views are concerning his troop plans.


5 posted on 07/22/2008 3:23:42 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Oh my coolaide has a fist name, it's B A R A K, my coolaide has a second name it's J U A N Y...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The anti-war left is not having a cow over Obama’s new positions because they don’t believe a word of it....and neither should anyone else.


6 posted on 07/22/2008 3:30:22 PM PDT by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Obama and his cohorts are lying about the iraqi support for his plan. Maliki simply indicated he suppoorted withdrawal when the secutrity requirements were met, which has been the plan all along.

In reality, Obama's plan is morphing into Bush and McCain's plan...and he is trying desprately to make it that way as seemlessly as possible so he can get out in front of the surge success and claim the ultimate withdrawals as his own.

I believe most Americans will see through this, and also believe we have to help spread the word on this changling marxist.

CHOOSING THE NEXT PRESIDENT

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA - CHANGE YOU CAN COUNT ON, BUT DON'T WANT

THE AUDACITY OF TRUTH ABOUT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA

7 posted on 07/22/2008 3:30:55 PM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

If the messianc aura attributed to Obama wasn’t apparent before, composing the photograph at this angle proves it now. Just crown him and be done with it.


8 posted on 07/22/2008 3:34:25 PM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
In Iraq , Obama won a tacit Iraqi endorsement of a plan to withdraw U.S. combat troops in 2010, but he also said that he backs leaving a residual force in Iraq to help train military personnel, provide security for U.S. interests and thwart terrorist threats. ...

A couple of lies. He didn't win "endorsement". Further, his plan isn't to take troops out IN 2010, it's to take troops out starting TODAY, which if he started today would end in December of 2009, and would be down below 50,000 long before then.

Except now there's this "residual force", which in fact Iraq isn't so sure about, and frankly I'm not sure what that means to his "measured withdraw".

Each time Obama explains his plan, it changes.

9 posted on 07/22/2008 3:58:21 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

As of today, the Obama platform is:

1) More War
2) High En\ergy Prices and
3) Higher Taxes

How can that win???


10 posted on 07/22/2008 8:00:12 PM PDT by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson