Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Global Warming Scam for Travelers
Continental Airlines web pages ^ | continental airlines

Posted on 07/21/2008 8:26:32 AM PDT by saminfl

Carbon Offsetting Option Continental is committed to promoting environmental responsibility within its culture, which includes helping our customers to respond to concerns about climate change with a carbon offsetting option. We've partnered with Sustainable Travel International ("STI"), a non-profit organization dedicated to providing education and services that support environmental conservation, to provide this option to customers. If you want to leave continental.com to learn more about STI or to purchase carbon offsets from STI for this itinerary, go to sustainabletravelinternational.org/sti_offset_air/flights/c/2.

CO2 Offset Calculation for your Continental Airlines itinerary Total Passengers 1 Flight segments VPS SLC VPS SLC

Flight type Round trip Total flight distance 3178 miles / 5114 km Metric tons CO2 0.4774 Please select one of the following Offset Projects $5.73 International Reforestation Projects Projects to recreate critical forests and provide incentives to protect critical forest land and avoid the cutting of trees. Projects are designed using the standards set forth by the Climate, Community, and Biodiversity Alliance (www.climate-standards.org).

$15.00 U.S. Renewable Energy Projects Renewable energy projects such as wind farms that are used to generate clean energy in the western U.S. Bonneville Environmental foundation provides STI with Green-e certified (www.green-e.org), 100% renewable green tags for this program.

$16.71 Gold Standard Projects Renewable energy and energy efficiency projects are inspected and validated by Clean Development Mechanism accredited Designated Operational Entities including The Gold Standard (www.cdmgoldstandard.org).

$10.79 Combination of several offset Projects (calculated based on 25% Gold Standard, 25% U.S. Renewable Energy Projects, 50% International Reforestation Projects)

For more information on the Donation Projects (note: a new browser window will pop-up):


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: climatechange; corporateliberalism; environment; globalwarmingscare; grifters; thegreenmenace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: AU72
Are these 'carbon offsets' tradable?

I was thinking more along the lines of buying stock in the companies that purport to sell offsets and fulfill them. The ones that plants the actual trees, or buy up tracts of land for wind farms. During the intermnet boom, people didn't go out and buy internets, they bought stock in Cisco and Netscape and AOL.

21 posted on 07/21/2008 9:28:07 AM PDT by webheart (I am Webheart, and I approved this post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: weegee
"So if I become a non-producing business, can I just sell "my own" carbon credits to other companies? "

I'm not sure how it works, but some of the newer ethanol and bio fuel plants are so efficient, that they are generating "carbon tax credits" (which are worth $30 each) which directly increases their bottom line financial earnings.

This is really ticking off the Gore-Bull warming pundits, because they were expecting these companies to BUY carbon offsets, not produce them for profit.
They didn't expect American capitalists to figure out a way to tuen it into a money maker, thus keeping American dollars in America.

22 posted on 07/21/2008 9:32:10 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
The BC tax is quite comprehensive — it applies to all fuels, & all users. However, I don't think it applies to reductions in the “carbon sink”. It probably should do; for consistency’s sake — but, I'm not about to suggest it to anyone.
23 posted on 07/21/2008 9:34:11 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: saminfl

There goes my plans for a Retirement European trip. Screw them all! After all, there is no more Europe.


24 posted on 07/21/2008 9:39:09 AM PDT by noname07718 (The Senate is based on consensus. “Consensus is the absence of leadership” - Lady M.Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE
You forgot breathing ;)

That was my wife's first comment.

25 posted on 07/21/2008 10:15:15 AM PDT by saminfl (,/i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: saminfl
Carbon shmarbon.

The primary evidence that CO2 and the greenhouse effect have anything to do with raising global temperature is missing entirely. It isn't there.

No Smoking Hot Spot (The Australian)

That is a short and easily understandable article showing the plain truth. The hinge pin that links global temperature to the greenhouse effect is missing. It is easily measurable and hundreds of probes have done so.

26 posted on 07/21/2008 10:16:50 AM PDT by TigersEye (Drill or get off the Hill. ... call Nancy Pelosi @ 202 - 225 - 0100)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
The airline is probably not actually trying to dupe anyone -- the price of carbon offsets today is quite low, because the market is still small, and suppliers are still picking the low-lying fruit.

I think you are correct as far as the airline not intentionally trying to dupe anyone. But, as far as I am concerned, that Sustainable Travel organization is certainly trying to dupe everyone. They do not list one thing they are going to use the money for. I suspect all the dollars are going into keeping the organization's executives living the lifestyle they want to live.

27 posted on 07/21/2008 10:19:35 AM PDT by saminfl (,/i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

“Actual carbon taxes would (will?) be in the order of $100/ton CO2 — which would mean paying 3 or 4 times the amounts mentioned in the “choices”. The warmists want to lull people into thinking that getting “off oil” will be relatively painless.

(BTW, I didn’t just pull the $100 figure from the air. Here, in Canada, our federal Liberal party is promising a tax of $40/tonne of carbon — that’s over $120/ton CO2. Meanwhile, in BC, we already have a provincial carbon tax that will rise to $30/tonne in 2012 — that’s nearly $100/ton CO2.)”

Don’t you mean that backwards?

C=12; O=16; 12+16+16=48, C=1/4CO2...


28 posted on 07/21/2008 10:36:08 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

The sleight-of-hand that allows this is that biofuels supposedly turn old CO2 into recycled new CO2 rather than additional CO2 added to the ‘burden.’


29 posted on 07/21/2008 10:38:30 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: webheart

Carbon offsets goes to plant trees? Trees produce CO2 carbons. The offsets should go to cutting down the trees. Am I right or what?


30 posted on 07/21/2008 10:46:11 AM PDT by kempo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: saminfl; TenthAmendmentChampion; Horusra; CygnusXI; Entrepreneur; Defendingliberty; WL-law; ...
 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

31 posted on 07/21/2008 12:07:21 PM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

“Don’t you mean that backwards?”

No, I don’t think so — although you had me going back to the calculator & sharpening my pencil.

A tax of $30/ton Carbon = 30 X 44/12 = $110/ton CO2 (I approximated from there, to take into account the difference between a metric tonne, and a standard ton).


32 posted on 07/21/2008 1:48:08 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: saminfl
“But, as far as I am concerned, that Sustainable Travel organization is certainly trying to dupe everyone.”

No doubt about it. I put them in the same category as the “fair trade” organizations, which have us all paying extra for coffee, chocolate, etc. in the name of “fair trade”. Of course, these organizations are the sole arbiters of what's “fair” & they take a few points off the top for their endorsement.

If they just took money from moonbats, who believe their fairy tales; I wouldn't mind so much. However, the next step is to pass laws, so that everyone pays.

33 posted on 07/21/2008 2:04:48 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
However, the next step is to pass laws, so that everyone pays.

I am afraid that is going to happen.

34 posted on 07/22/2008 6:48:42 AM PDT by saminfl (,/i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: saminfl

Expedia iss doing it too. Needless to say I did NOT purchase any!


35 posted on 07/22/2008 7:07:16 AM PDT by pgkdan (Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions - G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

Are the screaming greenies buying them or just feeling guilty when they click on past the option to purchase carbon credits pretending to not see them?

Someone should start a thread on DU.


36 posted on 07/22/2008 7:12:59 AM PDT by listenhillary (There's more people in the wagon, than there is pushin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

There is still only one ton of carbon; if the tax is on carbon it doesn’t matter what the total weight of CO2 is, now if the tax is on CO2 weight then you are correct.


37 posted on 07/22/2008 7:43:12 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

You are right — I was fixated on a $100/tonne carbon tax cost, because I had just read some articles by local activists calling for that amount of tax here.


38 posted on 07/22/2008 9:54:21 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson