Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain in fresh Dust Up With Media
Drudge ^

Posted on 07/21/2008 8:15:48 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55

Just a headline on Drudge now.

But I noticed a dust up about a month ago.

A McCain staffer wanted to look at the shot before he was interviewed.

The reporter and news staff objected and took video and then posted it.

http://www.myfoxstl.com/myfox/pages/Home/Detail?contentId=6993095&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=1.1.1

I wonder if this is what Drudge is talking about or if this is a different incident?


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2008election; mccain; mccaindustup; mccainlist; mccaintruthfile; mctrolls; mctrollwars; media
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

1 posted on 07/21/2008 8:15:48 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
McCain dust up with media
2 posted on 07/21/2008 8:16:16 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

Haha wasn’t it Maria Shriver McCain told to “shut up” LOL


3 posted on 07/21/2008 8:16:45 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

McCain should be running against the Media and against Congress 24/7.


4 posted on 07/21/2008 8:30:41 AM PDT by gridlock (Al Gore wants YOU to live like the Flintstones while HE lives like the Jetsons. .. FREE LAZAMATAZ!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
McCain better be ready for the biggest sucker-punch the media has ever thrown. Since he set himself up for it...shame on him.
5 posted on 07/21/2008 8:45:06 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (Obama is the feces created when shame eats too much stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Niteranger68

Yes, I was just going to say, Johnny Mac, you ain’t seen nuthin’ yet! You’d better toughen up son (politically speaking), because your middle-of-the-road position is gonna get you run over.

Quit trying to appease the enemy and get in a combat mode because what this nation is facing is jeapordizing our way of life and there’s a whole bunch of us that don’t view this crap with fuzzy-wuzzy sound bites. Get serious and FIGHT!


6 posted on 07/21/2008 8:50:05 AM PDT by brushcop (We remember SSG Harrison Brown, PVT Andrew Simmons B CO 2/69 3ID KIA Iraq OIF IV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; indylindy; calcowgirl; Ingtar; djsherin; Sunnyflorida; SoConPubbie; Sybeck1; ...

The Just Say No to Juan McCain Ping List.

Building the McCain Truth File, one thread at a time.

Rejecting anything short of common sense conservatism.

To join: FReepmail rabscuttle385 to subscribe or to unsubscribe from this ping list.

This can be a very high-volume ping list at times.

We are exploring giving subscribers two different options for receiving pings: either to individual threads or to a single "digested" thread at the end of each calendar day. FReepmail rabscuttle385 if you are interested in receiving one or the other.

Take care to check the "mccainlist", "mccaintruthfile", and "mccain" keyword search links for related threads, since we can not possibly ping you to every relevant article that is posted. To flag a relevant thread, please add the keywords "mccainlist" and "mccaintruthfile".


Republican Commissar’s Warning: By joining this ping list, you may be subjected to the irrational rants and ramblings of McCainiacs, of "moderate" Republicans, of deeply confused conservatives resigned to voting for the lesser of two Democrats, and of countless trolls who simply want to meet a new overlord.

Per FR posting guidelines, we kindly ask that you be civil and polite in your comings and goings. Bonus points for being optimistic and in good cheer.


7 posted on 07/21/2008 8:53:16 AM PDT by rabscuttle385 ("When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brushcop

He thinks the media is his friend...


8 posted on 07/21/2008 8:54:51 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

Why would McCain expect anything different from the NYT? Oh, wait, didn’t they always love him before?......and they even endorsed him.

I guess they stopped liking mavericks.


9 posted on 07/21/2008 9:05:29 AM PDT by dforest (I had almost forgotten that McCain is the nominee. Too bad I was reminded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

He still does, and is a dimwit to think so.


10 posted on 07/21/2008 9:10:31 AM PDT by commonguymd (A de facto single party country is nigh. The partisan bickering is a mere bilking mechanism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

Ohhhh Rush is talking about this now.

They rejected McCain’s article to the New York Times.......


11 posted on 07/21/2008 9:10:55 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

NYT REJECTS MCCAIN’S EDITORIAL; SHOULD ‘MIRROR’ OBAMA
Mon Jul 21 2008 12:00:25 ET

An editorial written by Republican presidential hopeful McCain has been rejected by the NEW YORK TIMES — less than a week after the paper published an essay written by Obama, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

The paper’s decision to refuse McCain’s direct rebuttal to Obama’s ‘My Plan for Iraq’ has ignited explosive charges of media bias in top Republican circles.

‘It would be terrific to have an article from Senator McCain that mirrors Senator Obama’s piece,’ NYT Op-Ed editor David Shipley explained in an email late Friday to McCain’s staff. ‘I’m not going to be able to accept this piece as currently written.’

MORE

In McCain’s submission to the TIMES, he writes of Obama: ‘I am dismayed that he never talks about winning the war—only of ending it... if we don’t win the war, our enemies will. A triumph for the terrorists would be a disaster for us. That is something I will not allow to happen as president.’

NYT’s Shipley advised McCain to try again: ‘I’d be pleased, though, to look at another draft.’

[Shipley served in the Clinton Administration from 1995 until 1997 as Special Assistant to the President and Senior Presidential Speechwriter.]

MORE

A top McCain source claims the paper simply does not agree with the senator’s Iraq policy, and wants him to change it, not “re-work the draft.”

McCain writes in the rejected essay: ‘Progress has been due primarily to an increase in the number of troops and a change in their strategy. I was an early advocate of the surge at a time when it had few supporters in Washington. Senator Barack Obama was an equally vocal opponent. ‘I am not persuaded that 20,000 additional troops in Iraq is going to solve the sectarian violence there,’ he said on January 10, 2007. ‘In fact, I think it will do the reverse.’

MORE

Shipley, who is on vacation this week, explained his decision not to run the editorial.

‘The Obama piece worked for me because it offered new information (it appeared before his speech); while Senator Obama discussed Senator McCain, he also went into detail about his own plans.’

Shipley continues: ‘It would be terrific to have an article from Senator McCain that mirrors Senator Obama’s piece. To that end, the article would have to articulate, in concrete terms, how Senator McCain defines victory in Iraq.’

Developing...

The DRUDGE REPORT presents the McCain editorial in its submitted form:

In January 2007, when General David Petraeus took command in Iraq, he called the situation “hard” but not “hopeless.” Today, 18 months later, violence has fallen by up to 80% to the lowest levels in four years, and Sunni and Shiite terrorists are reeling from a string of defeats. The situation now is full of hope, but considerable hard work remains to consolidate our fragile gains.

Progress has been due primarily to an increase in the number of troops and a change in their strategy. I was an early advocate of the surge at a time when it had few supporters in Washington. Senator Barack Obama was an equally vocal opponent. “I am not persuaded that 20,000 additional troops in Iraq is going to solve the sectarian violence there,” he said on January 10, 2007. “In fact, I think it will do the reverse.”

Now Senator Obama has been forced to acknowledge that “our troops have performed brilliantly in lowering the level of violence.” But he still denies that any political progress has resulted.

Perhaps he is unaware that the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad has recently certified that, as one news article put it, “Iraq has met all but three of 18 original benchmarks set by Congress last year to measure security, political and economic progress.” Even more heartening has been progress that’s not measured by the benchmarks. More than 90,000 Iraqis, many of them Sunnis who once fought against the government, have signed up as Sons of Iraq to fight against the terrorists. Nor do they measure Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki’s new-found willingness to crack down on Shiite extremists in Basra and Sadr City—actions that have done much to dispel suspicions of sectarianism.

The success of the surge has not changed Senator Obama’s determination to pull out all of our combat troops. All that has changed is his rationale. In a New York Times op-ed and a speech this week, he offered his “plan for Iraq” in advance of his first “fact finding” trip to that country in more than three years. It consisted of the same old proposal to pull all of our troops out within 16 months. In 2007 he wanted to withdraw because he thought the war was lost. If we had taken his advice, it would have been. Now he wants to withdraw because he thinks Iraqis no longer need our assistance.

To make this point, he mangles the evidence. He makes it sound as if Prime Minister Maliki has endorsed the Obama timetable, when all he has said is that he would like a plan for the eventual withdrawal of U.S. troops at some unspecified point in the future.

Senator Obama is also misleading on the Iraqi military’s readiness. The Iraqi Army will be equipped and trained by the middle of next year, but this does not, as Senator Obama suggests, mean that they will then be ready to secure their country without a good deal of help. The Iraqi Air Force, for one, still lags behind, and no modern army can operate without air cover. The Iraqis are also still learning how to conduct planning, logistics, command and control, communications, and other complicated functions needed to support frontline troops.

No one favors a permanent U.S. presence, as Senator Obama charges. A partial withdrawal has already occurred with the departure of five “surge” brigades, and more withdrawals can take place as the security situation improves. As we draw down in Iraq, we can beef up our presence on other battlefields, such as Afghanistan, without fear of leaving a failed state behind. I have said that I expect to welcome home most of our troops from Iraq by the end of my first term in office, in 2013.

But I have also said that any draw-downs must be based on a realistic assessment of conditions on the ground, not on an artificial timetable crafted for domestic political reasons. This is the crux of my disagreement with Senator Obama.

Senator Obama has said that he would consult our commanders on the ground and Iraqi leaders, but he did no such thing before releasing his “plan for Iraq.” Perhaps that’s because he doesn’t want to hear what they have to say. During the course of eight visits to Iraq, I have heard many times from our troops what Major General Jeffrey Hammond, commander of coalition forces in Baghdad, recently said: that leaving based on a timetable would be “very dangerous.”

The danger is that extremists supported by Al Qaeda and Iran could stage a comeback, as they have in the past when we’ve had too few troops in Iraq. Senator Obama seems to have learned nothing from recent history. I find it ironic that he is emulating the worst mistake of the Bush administration by waving the “Mission Accomplished” banner prematurely.

I am also dismayed that he never talks about winning the war—only of ending it. But if we don’t win the war, our enemies will. A triumph for the terrorists would be a disaster for us. That is something I will not allow to happen as president. Instead I will continue implementing a proven counterinsurgency strategy not only in Iraq but also in Afghanistan with the goal of creating stable, secure, self-sustaining democratic allies.


12 posted on 07/21/2008 9:12:55 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55; Admin Moderator

Hey mods.. do you consider this breaking news?

If so you could move it over there.

They rejected McCains Op-Ed article because they didn’t agree with it!


13 posted on 07/21/2008 9:16:28 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
"He thinks the media is his friend..."

Do you think he regrets not jumping to the RAT party when he was flirting with it?

They would be loving him long time now.

14 posted on 07/21/2008 9:30:32 AM PDT by lormand (Don't vote democRAT, from either party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lormand
"Do you think he regrets not jumping to the RAT party when he was flirting with it?"

Can you supply us with the names of those who claim McCain "flirted" with the idea of switching Parties? Please don't insult us with the names of liberals, ok? Either non partisans or Republicans will do and direct quotes only, not some unspecified "sources" Thanks

15 posted on 07/21/2008 9:49:42 AM PDT by lexusppd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

“He thinks the media is his friend...”

They got him to this point. The only republican the NY times would ever endorse in the primary.

McCain should have been finished when during one of the debates the nominees were told to stay seated and answer from their chair...but not McCain, he jumps up and parades across the stage grandstanding, hogging the entire debate. What did the moderator say? NOTHING. Then Rudy did the same thing. Neither one of them can follow simple directions or rules.


16 posted on 07/21/2008 10:02:22 AM PDT by AuntB (Vote Obama! ..........Because ya can't blame 'the man' when you are the 'man'.... Wanda Sikes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lexusppd
"Please don't insult us with the names of liberals, ok?"

OK, you asked for it.

How about John Weaver, McCain's chief political strategists in 07'?

"In interviews with The Hill this month, former Sen. Tom Daschle (D-S.D.) and ex-Rep. Tom Downey (D-N.Y.) said there were nearly two months of talks with the maverick lawmaker following an approach by John Weaver, McCain’s chief political strategist."

17 posted on 07/21/2008 10:02:33 AM PDT by lormand (Don't vote democRAT, from either party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
...NYT Op-Ed editor David Shipley explained in an email late Friday to McCain’s staff

no problem, McCain won't know about any email unless his staff tells him about it, or prints it out for him

.

18 posted on 07/21/2008 10:04:12 AM PDT by repentant_pundit (Strong leaders are overrated. We need strong followers...of the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lexusppd; lormand
Can you supply us with the names of those who claim McCain "flirted" with the idea of switching Parties? Please don't insult us with the names of liberals, ok? Either non partisans or Republicans will do and direct quotes only, not some unspecified "sources" Thanks

Given his penchant for left-wing or moderate positions on many issues even with or without verifiable Republican sources that story has legs.

Shoot, just his positions on implementing the Carbon Cap and Trade program, the Gang of 14, and his statements in support of Kerry, Clinton and the Democrat party should be enough to prove this probably happened.
19 posted on 07/21/2008 10:04:23 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; lexusppd

lexusppd has been provided with the proof he wished didn’t exist.


20 posted on 07/21/2008 10:07:39 AM PDT by lormand (Don't vote democRAT, from either party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson