Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

1. Will law enforcement be issued tape measures?

2. Is the three inches measured vertically or horizontally?

3. Will plumbers be fined for showing cleavage over thee inches?

1 posted on 07/21/2008 7:13:41 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Clint N. Suhks
Young adults in the village, like 21-year-old Joe Klomes, say the new law infringes on their personal style. He says leaders should instead spend money on making the area look nicer.

No brains at all, some of them. Just some grey fluff blown in by accident.

2 posted on 07/21/2008 7:15:49 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

I’m thinking they have turned a wish and a cultural norm into what will be listed in the future as a “stupid law, such as “you can’t tie your giraffe to a parking meter” and “no walking your pet alligator on city sidewalks”.


3 posted on 07/21/2008 7:15:58 AM PDT by Jemian (Politics is just choking good sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

The mayor is a man ‘of color’ ...

it’ll be interesting to see where this goes.

http://www.lynwoodil.us/departments/AdministrationVillageOfficials.asp


4 posted on 07/21/2008 7:16:43 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks
I have decided to call this look:

Poopy Pants ! ....looks like they are carrying around a load in their britches.

5 posted on 07/21/2008 7:18:20 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Madness - "Baggy Trousers"
7 posted on 07/21/2008 7:24:24 AM PDT by fishtank (FIRST defeat Obama. ------------------ THEN resist McCain. ---------- A good plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

The problem with a law such as this is its one-size-fits-all nature. In reality, attractive people should be permitted to go naked if they wish, while ugly ones should have to wear burkas.


11 posted on 07/21/2008 7:29:19 AM PDT by tvdog12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

is that 3” exposed?
90% of the time these guys also wear shirts that are about knee length.


12 posted on 07/21/2008 7:31:33 AM PDT by absolootezer0 ( Detroit: we're so bad, even our mayor is a criminal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

I would think not sagging would be a matter of practicality. It’s much harder to run from the police with your pants down around your knees.


14 posted on 07/21/2008 7:32:16 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Five Year Plans and New Deals, wrapped in golden chains...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

This is so stupid. Do these idiots really have nothing better to do than to come up with crap like this?

Remember when this used to be a free country?


15 posted on 07/21/2008 7:32:24 AM PDT by frankiep (Every socialist is a disguised dictator - Ludwig von Mises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks
The American Civil Liberties Union says the ordinance targets young men of color.

Really? Then the ACLU should send an official observer out to the New Jersey suburbs to see thousands of slackjawed white teens walking around with the top half of their boxers on display.

17 posted on 07/21/2008 7:38:31 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

The ordinance is as stupid as the practice it’s trying to regulate. Hemlines, necklines, and lengths of pants and sleeves have always fluctuated. It was only a matter of time before someone did this with pants—they got close with hip-huggers of the 60’s. No one complains about breast cleavage. And here there is no buttock cleavage showing. It would be equivalent to someone wearing a very low cut halter top with a t-shirt underneath. The biggest problem with this “style” is how stupid it looks, just like a “grill” for the teeth or two big fake diamond earrings on guys. Once you have a bunch of white college students doing it, it will fall out of fashion. In the meantime, there should be no laws passed, just a lot of people pointing fingers and laughing their butts off over it.


21 posted on 07/21/2008 8:01:49 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

The law doesn’t mention any race. The ACLU is racist for saying that only one race walks around this way.


22 posted on 07/21/2008 8:17:23 AM PDT by BooksForTheRight.com (Fight liberal lies with knowledge. Read conservative books and articles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

The problem here is the social welfare state. I think most of the people who wear their pants like that are unemployeed. I do not know of any employers who would let employees dress like that. I do not what schools allow, but the schools are within their bounds to institute dress codes. The problem does reflect poorly on the individuals but it also reflects on society, where we have healthy young unemployeed men living well without gainful employment and unaffected by the dress codes applied in the working world.


23 posted on 07/21/2008 8:27:14 AM PDT by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

In high school, girls were always showing their underwear. Only those chosen by the offender were allowed to hold the measuring tape. The offended were just happy to look.


27 posted on 07/21/2008 9:08:42 AM PDT by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Bummer!!

This is going to put a LOT of plumbers out of work!!

/sarc


29 posted on 07/21/2008 9:39:17 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Want to get rid of this fad? Start spreading it around that the reason to keep their pants so low is that it makes it easier for them to let some other guy bugger them.
32 posted on 07/21/2008 2:05:25 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson