Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Dwarf Planet!
CCSSC.org ^ | 7/14/08

Posted on 07/20/2008 10:55:33 AM PDT by LibWhacker

Image credit: compiled from NASA public images

At times, people still express bemusement, or confusion, that Pluto was reclassified as a "dwarf planet", after having been considered a full-fledged planet for the better part of a century. One thing I always point out to them is that we're discovering more and more roughly Pluto-sized bodies. If we call them all planets, the list of planets would rapidly grow unmanageable! (Do you want to memorize the names of 20 planets? How about 80?)

Today the list just got bumped up by one. Meet Makemake, the first body in our solar system to be classified as a dwarf planet since the 2006 IAU decision that established the category of dwarf planets in the first place. When the IAU made its ruling, they put three worlds in that category: Pluto, Ceres, and Eris. Now Makemake makes the fourth.

Follow up:

It's also the third world to be classified as plutoid - a dwarf planet beyond Neptune's orbit. Pluto and Eris (and now Makemake) are plutoids; Ceres, which orbits in the asteroid belt, isn't.

The discoverer of Makemake, Mike Brown, is the same guy who discovered Eris. (That discovery triggered a lot of the most recent discussion of what makes a planet, so in a way, Dr. Brown's discoveries led to the whole dwarf planet issue in the first place.) He has a fascinating discussion of why he proposed the name Makemake for this world. The name was confirmed by the IAU at the same time as the world was classified as dwarf planet and plutoid.

So now the planetary record stands thusly:

You can keep track with this official IAU list.

Expect this list to expand, however. There are many bodies that stand a good chance of being added to the dwarf planet list. In most cases, it's a matter of confirming that these bodies are actually more or less spherical - that they're large enough for their own gravity to have pulled them into a sphere. (Geek speak for this: hydrostatic equilibrium.) Some future candidates:

That's not counting Charon, which is currently listed as a moon of Pluto. Physically speaking, though, that's questionable, since it would be more accurate to say that Pluto and Charon both orbit around their common center of mass, which lies somewhere between them. I personally think that Pluto and Charon should be considered a "double dwarf planet"...



TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: dwarf; makemake; planet; plutoid; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 07/20/2008 10:55:34 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


2 posted on 07/20/2008 10:57:40 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

minnie mearth?


3 posted on 07/20/2008 10:58:17 AM PDT by al baby (Hi mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Don’t call them Dwarf Planets. They prefer to be called Little Planets.

Let’s have some consideration around here : )


4 posted on 07/20/2008 10:58:20 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (I voted Republican because no Conservatives were running.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

They are little planets not dwarfs - and certainly not midgets!


5 posted on 07/20/2008 10:58:35 AM PDT by The Lumster (USA - where the innocent have nothing to fear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

That picture is hilarious. I hadn’t seen that one before. LOL!


6 posted on 07/20/2008 11:00:53 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The U.S. Constitution was not written to protect those who want to destroy America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I wish he’d named it Mike Brown instead of Makemake.


7 posted on 07/20/2008 11:01:46 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Only a Kennedy between us and tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Makemake is not a new plutoid. Too much hype in the headline.


8 posted on 07/20/2008 11:03:09 AM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Interesting but why go away from the tradition of naming them after characters in Greek or Roman mythology? I have no idea where Makemake comes from but would bet long odds that it has something to do with political correctness.


9 posted on 07/20/2008 11:06:33 AM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Title is obviously a mistake (if not worse). It should have been “Under the wise guidance of Obama NASA scientists make more discoveries”.
10 posted on 07/20/2008 11:06:48 AM PDT by alecqss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
a planet is now officially known as "a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape and (c) has cleared the neighborhood around its orbit."

Question: What the hell does "cleared the neighborhood" mean and how is it quantitatively measured?

Answer: The planet has no illegal aliens within on light year.

11 posted on 07/20/2008 11:08:55 AM PDT by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

I think he’d argue that it’s not officially a plutoid until the IAU makes its ruling, which it did on Monday. But you’re quite right, I think Makemake was discovered back in May, wasn’t it?


12 posted on 07/20/2008 11:09:57 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Ping.


13 posted on 07/20/2008 11:10:26 AM PDT by LucyT (What happens in Denver won't stay in Denver... August 25 - 28, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Makemake is newly named. I can allow that much. First star should be appearing in a couple weeks if it clears up; until then I allow very little.


14 posted on 07/20/2008 11:13:57 AM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

Makemake is a polynesian god.

I’m waiting for the first person to try naming a dwarf planet “allah.” That should be fun to watch.


15 posted on 07/20/2008 11:14:35 AM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
Yup... From the discovering astronomer's page:
Makemake is the creator of humanity and the god of fertility in the mythology of the South Pacific island of Rapa Nui. He was the chief god of the Tangata manu bird-man cult and was worshipped in the form of sea birds, which were his incarnation. His material symbol, a man with a bird's head, can be found carved in petroglyphs on the island.

Makemake, being of Polynesian descent, is pronounced Hawaiian-style (or at least what I think of as Hawaiian style), as “Maki-maki.”


16 posted on 07/20/2008 11:16:46 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I can’t believe it matters.


17 posted on 07/20/2008 11:20:00 AM PDT by Mikey_1962 (Just a typical white guy: clinging to my guns, my religion, and my antipathy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Space is dark.
Space is... cold.
Stars occupy minute quantities of space,
they are clustered a few billion here a few billion there,
as if seeking safety in numbers.
Space does not care.


18 posted on 07/20/2008 11:22:46 AM PDT by Seruzawa (American Government: Providing Middle Class Incomes to Unemployables for Over 200 Years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole
I’m waiting for the first person to try naming a dwarf planet “allah.” That should be fun to watch.

How about naming a hurricane "Muhammad" or "Ali"??

We should definitely protest the exclusion of the name Muhammad for a hurricane as the Government condoning a religion. (or whatever the opposite of separation from church and State)
19 posted on 07/20/2008 11:22:56 AM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (http://auntiecoosa.blogspot.com -- read, learn, blog, or get out of my way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

His website says it was discovered in 2005.


20 posted on 07/20/2008 11:24:55 AM PDT by Library Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson