Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Invention no pipe dream for Willow physicist (Fractal tubes)
Mat-Su Valley Frontiersman ^ | July 20, 2008 | Michael Rovito

Posted on 07/20/2008 10:39:15 AM PDT by AlaskaErik

WILLOW — Daniel Russell calls himself the country physicist, and if what he’s invented gets noticed by someone with the ability to mass produce it, he could help revolutionize the building industry.

Russell, a German immigrant living in Willow, holds three U.S. patents and has two pending. Two of those patents could impact the building world by providing a process and product to construct super-strong, nearly indestructible buildings without killing a single tree. Daniel Russell holds the patent on fractal tubes, which are hollow fibers formed into tubes that are then formed into hollow cylinders. These fractal tubes, which can be up to 600 times stronger than steel, can be used by builders, Russell says.

Russell is a soft-spoken man who explains his invention slowly so those without a grasp of advanced physics can keep up. He holds the patent on fractal tubes, which are hollow fibers formed into tubes that are then formed into hollow cylinders that eventually are used to construct the walls of hollow columns.

Sound complicated?

It really isn’t, Russell said while displaying a prototype of his invention. The process simply requires increasing the strength-to-weight ratio of the material by minimizing the mass and atomic dimensions while maintaining order in line with the atomic compressibility law, he said.

OK, so to him it’s not complicated.

Russell holds a bachelor’s degree in biology and physics and a master’s degree in physics. Born in Munich, Germany, Russell came to the United States in the late 1950s. After graduating from the University of South Florida, he landed a job with the U.S. Navy, first working with radiological controls, then going on to work in the Navy’s patents office.

The job was his first taste of the process one must go through to get an invention patented.

“In those days it took 18 months to get a patent,” Russell said. “These days it takes around three and a half years.”

Russell’s love of physics grew from a desire to understand life better, he said. “I got more and more into physics and started applying the laws of physics to everyday problems,” he said.

Wanting a change of pace, Russell came to Alaska in 2000 looking to escape the heat of Florida and see a different side of the country. Now, after more than three years of waiting for a decision from the patent office, his fractal tubes stand to become a boon to the building industry because of what Russell calls their tough construction and tree-saving material composition.

To the naked eye, Russell’s fractal tubes look like clustered cylinders bonded together in a circle, creating a hollow space in the middle. Group enough of them together, while using the right material, and the fractal tubes form a building column strong enough for use in homes and buildings.

The process is based largely from quantum nuclear physics, Russell said. He likens his fractal tubes to an atom, which, he said, is one of the strongest substances known but is also 99 percent empty space.

The same principle applies to the fractal structures, a series of hollow, thin-walled tubes, fiber reinforced and bonded with cement or any other bonding agent.

While looking thin and almost flimsy, they are, in fact, very strong. A cylinder made from carbon nanofiber, for example, is 600 times stronger than steel, yet light because it doesn’t have unnecessary mass to increase its bulk, Russell said.

The benefit to building comes from the ability of fractal tubes to withstand rust and decay, Russell said, adding they are also not damaged by water, do not burn and don’t need maintenance.

Since the fractal tubes can be made to look like real logs, with a coat of paint or some sort of facade covering, “log” houses in Alaska could be constructed without cutting down a single tree, Russell said, which might make the green building crowd happy.

Russell said the complex arrangement of fibers in his fractal tubes would also stop the progression of cracks during an earthquake.

Homeowners can benefit from all this by having a house that, in terms of building material quality, is strong and lasts forever. Russell now needs someone to realize his invention and what he says it could mean for builders. Now that his fractal tubes are patented, Russell will get a royalty from any sale of his invention and credit as the product’s creator.

How much it would cost a manufacturer to make fractal tubes varies depending on the kind of material used, Russell said. Using open mesh fiberglass would be the cheapest option, while materials such as carbon fiber and Kevlar would raise the costs significantly.

The viability of fractal tubes on the building market may hinge on how builders react to the product, Russell said.

“I think anything is possible depending on what is the manufacturing process and how really good does it look,” said Robin Braaten, an owner of Expedition Log Homes, who had not seen or heard of fractal tubes before.

Jeff Clements, owner of Great Northern Homes and Construction, said he typically likes to see a product proven in the field before using it.

That doesn’t mean he and other builders aren’t up for looking into something new, he added. Usually, builders attend trade shows that introduce new products or processes from manufacturers. If a company is interested, the deals will go from there.

Still, being proven in practice helps a new product’s reputation, Clements said.

“If I use a brand-new product and that product fails, I have some sort of liability to my customer,” he said.

Trade shows may be in the future for Russell, but before that there’s still some engineering tests to complete. Then, finding a partner or interested company to help with the production of fractal tubes is on the agenda.

For Russell, this is just the beginning. Now that he has the patents he can move forward to educate the building world about his fractal tubes.

Until then, he’ll be in Willow, refining and creating inventions with an eye for innovation and mind for science.

“I am the country physicist,” Russell said.

Contact Michael Rovito at michael.rovito@frontiers- man.com or 352-2252.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fractal; physics; tubes
For the scientific oriented FReeper.
1 posted on 07/20/2008 10:39:15 AM PDT by AlaskaErik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik
I doubt it's commercial viability until it can be manufactured. This is earily similar to the ‘space elevator’ material I've been reading about for decades.
2 posted on 07/20/2008 10:44:11 AM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik
Three cheers for the discovery, but a boo and a couple of hisses for naming it 'fractal'.

Despite all the science press blather there are no fractals in nature. A fractal is a topological space of fractional Hausdorff dimension. The entire concept depends on the infinite divisibility of idealized mathematical spaces (there's always a number between any pair of distinct numbers once one allows fractions). Physical space is not infinitely divisible: if one attempt to measure a location finer than the Planck scale, a tiny black hole is created and the locations one is attempting to measure no longer exist. Thus there are no fractals in nature.

3 posted on 07/20/2008 11:09:04 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

Can you prove what you just typed?


4 posted on 07/20/2008 11:13:00 AM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

The same model ‘proves’ no 2 snowflakes are alike. It’s BS.


5 posted on 07/20/2008 11:17:56 AM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik

Lumberyard sells railroad ties that look like they have been run over by a parade of D-9 Cats for $10. Can’t imagine these nanofractal thingys would be cheaper.


6 posted on 07/20/2008 11:20:36 AM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmost

That was already proved 300 years ago.


7 posted on 07/20/2008 11:21:57 AM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

“Thus there are no fractals in nature. “

Nanotubes don’t grow on trees, either.


8 posted on 07/20/2008 11:22:02 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

“Can’t imagine these nanofractal thingys would be cheaper.”

But they are much lighter.


9 posted on 07/20/2008 11:23:20 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

I don’t need to be chasing down my cabin every time a gust of wind comes up.


10 posted on 07/20/2008 11:25:22 AM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: allmost

At what level of rigor? It was actually a statement about physics, so a mathematically rigorous proof is off base. The conclusion that physical space is not infinitely divisible is a natural consequence of general relativity and the quantization of energy: there is a smallest physically meaningful amount of energy (or equivalently mass), and there is a scale at which that mass will collapse into its own Schwarzschild radius.


11 posted on 07/20/2008 11:51:45 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

No, but they occur in soot (short ones, at least), and thus are natural phenomena.


12 posted on 07/20/2008 11:52:54 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik
I stayed at a Holiday Inn Expresstm last night.
13 posted on 07/20/2008 12:17:01 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
I stayed at a Holiday Inn Expresstm last night.

I stayed in my house last night. Much nicer than a Holiday Inn Express.

14 posted on 07/20/2008 2:26:16 PM PDT by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Democrats spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: allmost

If you stand 20 feet away from a wall and always close that distance by half, you will theoretically never reach the wall.


15 posted on 07/20/2008 2:36:08 PM PDT by elephantlips
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: elephantlips

At n=infinity, then y=0 thus it is not correct to say you will never get there, it will just take infinate time. ;)


16 posted on 07/20/2008 3:58:39 PM PDT by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc; elephantlips
At n=infinity, then y=0 thus it is not correct to say you will never get there, it will just take infinate time. ;)

That reminds me of an old joke:

A mathematician and an engineer are taken to a room. On the opposite side of the room is an incredibly beautiful woman in sexy lingerie. The woman says, "I love smart men, so as soon as you come over to me, you can do whatever you want with me. There is only one stipulation: you can only approach me by going half the distance between us each time you move."

Immediately, the mathematician starts crying and the engineer starts drooling.

The woman asks the mathematician, "Why are you crying?" and the mathematician answers "Because I know that if I can only go half the distance each time, I'll never actually reach you! This is all just a big tease!"

The woman turns to the engineer and says, "Why aren't you upset?" The engineer replies, "Because I know that I'll never actually reach you, but I'll get close enough for all practical purposes!"
17 posted on 07/20/2008 4:40:33 PM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

bulloneyious

what you are spewing forth is just the latest theory.

wait until string theory and the physical state that existed at 1E-44 seconds after the big bang are united.

just as one cannot give conclusive proof that God exists to an unbeliever, you have not proven “Physical space is not infinitely divisible”. Space is infinite without and within. And infinitely divisible. Remember planck is the name of a person, not a universal reality...


18 posted on 07/20/2008 6:45:28 PM PDT by jbp1 (be nice now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jbp1

Nope, I’m drawing logical conclusions from the observed facts that mass is quantized and general relativity is correct.

The notion that space, or space-time, has the properties of a smooth manifold (away from singularities at black holes) is as seductive, and as wrong, as the impression that the earth is flat.

Only finitely many angels can dance on the head of a pin, as the old formulation of the debate would have had it.


19 posted on 07/20/2008 8:40:11 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson