Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why McCain Must Win
canadafreepress.com ^ | 07/19/08 | Bruce Walker

Posted on 07/19/2008 6:29:13 PM PDT by TornadoAlley3

President McCain in 2000 I must be one of the few conservative writers in cyberspace who never feared a McCain presidency. When Senator McCain looked like he might win the Republican nomination in 2000, I asked what, exactly, my friends were so worried about. McCain was honest, like Bush, while Clinton and Gore were steeped in moral slipperiness. McCain was pro-life, like Bush, while Clinton and Gore were pro-abortion. McCain, like Bush, supported a strong military, while Clinton famously “loathed” the military and Gore followed him like a trained poodle. McCain’s ACU (American Conservative Union) voting record is conservative and was even more conservative in 2000. Who did I favor for the nomination in 2000? Bush, because I liked him more and I thought he would win, but was I afraid of a McCain presidency? No, I was afraid that the nation could not survive a third Clinton term. Has anything happened in the last eight years to change my mind? Not, not really. September 11, 2001 has driven all politics since then, even energy (remember how recently gasoline was cheap?) and while I can conceive of McCain handling the war on terror differently, in some ways, than Bush, I cannot see either man being particularly better than the other. Although we are sometimes loath to admit it, McCain appeared more prescience than Bush on Iraq: McCain supported the Surge, asked for the Surge when Bush was reluctant, and McCain was dead right. The Left would have vilified President McCain just as it vilified President Bush and for the same reasons: It wants America to lose all its wars.

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; conservatives; democrats; demotivation; despair; election; electionpresident; fear; foreignpolicy; issues; mccain; mccaindemocrat; mccainlist; mccaintruthfile; obama; obamacans; obamacons; rino; rinoalert; rinomadness; war; zombierino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 421-440 next last
To: JennysCool

I’m one of the good Senator’s constituents, and I haven’t seen a vote on anything at all in the past 6-8 months. He didn’t even vote on the FISA law that Obambi voted for.


81 posted on 07/19/2008 7:42:16 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Who would McQueeg rather have mad at him: You or the liberals?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

82 ACU rating vs 0.

82 does not equal 0, even to the “stupid”.


82 posted on 07/19/2008 7:42:46 PM PDT by Baladas ((ABBHO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

To me, a big pile of “no votes” is the functional equivalent of “zero.”


83 posted on 07/19/2008 7:46:51 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Who would McQueeg rather have mad at him: You or the liberals?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: All

To whom it may concern, let’s avoid making it personal.


84 posted on 07/19/2008 7:49:50 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
His lifetime conservative voting record is actually 82.3% as of 2006.

Actually, it was 65% in '06. It is 82.3% lifetime.

85 posted on 07/19/2008 7:51:18 PM PDT by South40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: South40
Er, i said lifetime.
86 posted on 07/19/2008 7:54:18 PM PDT by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: MartinStyles

So if Obama is the Democratic candidate, the GOP can run anyone and you’ll vote for them?

McCain’s candidacy is a perversion of politics.

How many parties would offer support to the man who killed off the party’s majority?

Who but the GOP would accept getting spat on by their candidate cuz they dislike the other party’s candiddate so badly?


87 posted on 07/19/2008 7:55:46 PM PDT by Eagle Eye (I'm a RINO cuz I'm too conservative to be a Republican. McCain is the Conservatives true litmus test)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: MartinStyles

How about telling us of the dangers of incrementalism, Mr. Maturity?


88 posted on 07/19/2008 7:55:58 PM PDT by JoJo Gunn (The McCainiac's creed: Death to America by a thousand cuts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MartinStyles
Agree, McCain loves his country, Obama, no.
89 posted on 07/19/2008 7:57:26 PM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ('GOP' : Get Our Petroleum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunLover

but what I know is that the people of the United States will rise up against him and vote in true conservatives in 4 years.

How do you know that? They may like it, Other socialist countries rise up and change it, do they still have socialized medicine?


90 posted on 07/19/2008 7:59:23 PM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ('GOP' : Get Our Petroleum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn

New tagline...


91 posted on 07/19/2008 7:59:54 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The first step into incrementalism is the fist step onto a slippery slope...bye bye GOP...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye

Wouldn’t it be more correct to say that Obama must lose than McCain must win?

Okay, Obama must lose.


92 posted on 07/19/2008 8:02:09 PM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ('GOP' : Get Our Petroleum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: MeanMachine

I did not write the article and do not disagree, but Obama is much worse.


93 posted on 07/19/2008 8:03:02 PM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ('GOP' : Get Our Petroleum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

True. And, if McCain keeps boasting that Obama is the one that killed his amnesty bill, the scales might tip more towards Johnny.


94 posted on 07/19/2008 8:03:27 PM PDT by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Yeah, and that’s enough. AFAIC. I don’t see a point in even arguing with these people that bash Juan - they’re going to stay home or leave the ticket unpunched. Fine by me, Juan really won’t need their votes.


95 posted on 07/19/2008 8:03:56 PM PDT by Baladas ((ABBHO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

Too bad that other 15% means giving up our sovereignty and gutting the first amendment.


96 posted on 07/19/2008 8:04:58 PM PDT by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Then another candidate could be the answer?


97 posted on 07/19/2008 8:10:11 PM PDT by Eagle Eye (I'm a RINO cuz I'm too conservative to be a Republican. McCain is the Conservatives true litmus test)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Why I Support John McCain
by Dennis Prager

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/DennisPrager/2008/07/01/why_i_support_john_mccain?page=full

“My bottom line is this: The gulf between John McCain and conservatives is miniscule compared to the gulf between John McCain and Barack Obama. This is true regarding virtually every issue of significance to America. The America that a President Barack Obama would shape, with the help of a Democratic Congress and a liberal Supreme Court, would be very dissimilar from the America shaped by a President John McCain.

Conservatives who will not vote for McCain are well-intentioned utopians.

Therefore, as well meaning and sincere as many conservatives are, this mode of thinking — let the country suffer under a left-wing president, Congress, and Supreme Court and then it will come to its conservative senses — will likely lead to a downward spiral from which it is hard to see the country escaping for a generation, if it is lucky.

There is one person who can prevent this unhappy future — John McCain.

However noble their intentions, conservatives who do not vote for John McCain will be morally complicit in what happens to America during an Obama presidency.”


98 posted on 07/19/2008 8:11:25 PM PDT by FocusNexus ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

Obama “ would do the same thing to the Supreme Court as McCain”

Maybe, but Obama has promised to name liberals to the court. McCain has promised to name conservatives. They could be lying, but it is a sure thing that Obama will keep his word. There is a least a good chance McCain will.


99 posted on 07/19/2008 8:11:40 PM PDT by garjog (Used to be liberals were just people to disagree with. Now they are a threat to our existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
If that happens great, but for now, looks like a choice b/t McCain or Obama, I will not stay home and let Obama win, others can do what they want, it is a personal decision we all have to live with.
100 posted on 07/19/2008 8:12:12 PM PDT by TornadoAlley3 ('GOP' : Get Our Petroleum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 421-440 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson