Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yellowcake journalism
Waterbury Republican-American ^ | July 19, 2008 | Editorial

Posted on 07/19/2008 10:55:05 AM PDT by Graybeard58

Remember Joe Wilson? He's the diplomat who went to Niger to investigate Bush administration claims that Saddam Hussein had tried to buy yellowcake uranium, a raw material used in building nuclear bombs, from Africa. He wrote in a July 6, 2003, New York Times op-ed that he had spent the previous February in Niger, "drinking sweet mint tea and meeting with dozens of people ... associated with the country's uranium business. It did not take long to conclude that it was highly doubtful that any such transaction had ever taken place."

A story that has to be the most underplayed news item of the decade exposes Mr. Wilson's utter cluelessness, dishonesty or both. According to The Associated Press and other news services, the U.S. military transferred 550 tons of yellowcake, enough to produce 142 nuclear bombs, from Iraq to Canada at the Iraqi government's request. The yellowcake is believed to have been purchased by the Hussein regime before 1991; some may have been intended for the Osirak nuclear installation destroyed in an Israeli raid 10 years earlier.

Hussein got the yellowcake from somewhere. He almost certainly got it from Niger, Gabon, South Africa or Namibia, the four African countries with yellowcake mines. And Mr. Wilson, who served with the State Department in Baghdad and Gabon, didn't know (or didn't report in his Times op-ed) that Hussein possessed 550 tons of yellowcake at the time of Mr. Wilson's African junket.

The question this new development poses for the anti-war left: What do you suppose Hussein would be doing with his nuclear materials and WMD expertise today, more than five years after the Coalition of the Willing took him down, had he been allowed to remain in power?


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: cialeak; enricheduranium; gabon; iraqinukes; joewilson; lovedclintonswars; namibia; niger; saddam; shadowgovernment; southafrica; wilson; yellowcake; yellowjournalism; zogbyism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 07/19/2008 10:55:07 AM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pinkpanther111; BlessedBeGod; KosmicKitty; ballplayer; warsaw44; Grizzled Bear; Tunehead54; ...

Ping to a Republican-American Editorial.

If you want on or off this list, let me know.


2 posted on 07/19/2008 10:55:40 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Osama Obama is a lying sack of s***, communist, mooselimb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Bad people tell lies. Foolish people believe them. Weak people join the crowd. Consequences ensue.

3 posted on 07/19/2008 10:58:34 AM PDT by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

There is 100% chance that Hussein will NOT do anything with the yellow cake - now. If Hussein had stayed in power, as Candidate Barry would have preferred, there is far more than 0% chance that the yellow cake would have become “problematic”.


4 posted on 07/19/2008 11:02:23 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

I have talked to liberals who seem to truly believe that “IF” Saddam had nuclear material, he was just trying to develop nuclear energy for his people. Just trying to save the environment, you know. Saddam was a big environmentalist. Really.


5 posted on 07/19/2008 11:04:41 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

Do you ask them why a country sitting on huge oil reserves needs nuclear power?

Liberals have an intricately constructed view of the World, and they can’t allow in any facts that would shatter their construction.


6 posted on 07/19/2008 11:11:49 AM PDT by popdonnelly (Boycott Washington D.C. until they allow gun ownership)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
I have talked to liberals who seem to truly believe that “IF” Saddam had nuclear material, he was just trying to develop nuclear energy for his people. Just trying to save the environment, you know. Saddam was a big environmentalist. Really.

So a follow-up question for these people is, "So you think nuclear power generators are the way to go to save the environment?"

7 posted on 07/19/2008 11:13:54 AM PDT by jeffc (They're coming to take me away! Ha-ha, he-he, ho-ho!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

I wish this paper would increase it’s circulatin and put the hartford coissant out of business


8 posted on 07/19/2008 11:14:22 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty; The Pendleton 8: We are not going down without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffc
Lately I think liberals are starting to accept the idea of nuclear power. All anyone had to do was tell them, "France does it!"

But you know how they are. They'd wear panties on their heads if the French did it first.

9 posted on 07/19/2008 11:17:14 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
I have had the following link on my homepage since May of 2004 and I have told countless "anit-war" liberals about it. Note near the bottom of the article it states,

"Of the uranium, 500 tons is naturally occurring ore or yellowcake, a slightly processed concentrate that cannot be directly used in a bomb. Some 1.8 tons is classified as low-enriched uranium, a more potent form but still not sufficient for a weapon.

"A country like Iran," Cochran said, "could convert that into weapons-grade material with a lot fewer centrifuges than would be required with natural uranium."

Here is the link...


500 Tons of Uranium in Iraq!
10 posted on 07/19/2008 11:20:53 AM PDT by DocRock (All they that TAKE the sword shall perish with the sword. Matthew 26:52 Gun grabbers beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Of course the retrograde White House communications team didn’t even mention it, let alone calling a press conference. This is the worst communications effort be an Administration, in the history of the modern presidency.


11 posted on 07/19/2008 11:21:02 AM PDT by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
The question this new development poses for the anti-war left: What do you suppose Hussein would be doing with his nuclear materials and WMD expertise today, more than five years after the Coalition of the Willing took him down, had he been allowed to remain in power?

Well DUH! What else would he do with yellow cake? Baking of course!


12 posted on 07/19/2008 11:29:07 AM PDT by Bommer (A Third Party can win when Republicans and Democraps stand for the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
I have talked to liberals who seem to truly believe that “IF” Saddam had nuclear material, he was just trying to develop nuclear energy for his people. Just trying to save the environment, you know. Saddam was a big environmentalist. Really.

Riiight. That's why he drained those marsh areas, which ruined vast areas that had previously been fertile.

13 posted on 07/19/2008 11:30:40 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
Actually, the timing is a bit off, and some have questioned the contention that the yellowcake that was moved was the same material that Joe Wilson was talking about. If Hussein bought all the yellowcake that was moved, BEFORE 1991, that's not the same stuff that's being discussed in the Niger situation.

If I'm not mistaken, that large amount of yellowcake was moved while the UN was still being allowed into the country, before 2003, and they required him to move it. When he stopped allowing the UN observers into the country, of course, all bets were off. If that's the case, those who are trying to diminish the importance of the yellowcake that was moved are NOT thinking things through.

If Hussein was forced to send all that yellowcake out of the country, by the UN, he WOULD have been looking to replace it, so there is every likelihood that he would have been sending representatives to Africa to buy more. Joe Wilson doesn't seem to even consider the possibility that those who told him that Hussein wasn't trying to buy yellowcake were LYING to him. By his own admission, he wasn't out doing any detective work himself; he was just sitting around in comfort, drinking sweet tea, and having meetings with folks who were willing to talk to him.

14 posted on 07/19/2008 11:40:22 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

(I was told this by a co-worker)

“You have to understand that this was pre-9/11 yellowcake, bought in the early 90’s and already known about. Bush was making the case against Iraq on new purchases of yellowcake.”

As if a mushroom cloud gives a hoot when the yellowcake was bought.


15 posted on 07/19/2008 11:48:22 AM PDT by wbarmy (Hard core, extremist, right-wing is a little too mild for my tastes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

Canada has huge oil reserves (a lot bigger than Iraq’s) & we have nuclear power plants. We don’t need them — we just like having them around.


16 posted on 07/19/2008 11:50:21 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT

>>>There is 100% chance that Hussein will NOT do anything with the yellow cake - now. If Hussein had stayed in power, as Candidate Barry would have preferred, there is far more than 0% chance that the yellow cake would have become “problematic”.

Oh, come on now, gang!

Barry Harry Obama is going to be VERRRRRY convincing when he meets with the terrorists and rogue nations and commies and lefties and despots......

And they’ll have cake and ice cream and lolipops, and happiy dance arm-in-arm in the streets, with Barry Harry, and all will willingly agree with that ObamaSmile that they’ll all get rid of their nukes.....

And so Barry and Maddyline NotsoBright will conclude agreements will everyone of them to get rid of their nukes....

And Barry Harry Obama will get rid of ours.....

And when BHO returns home from his personal, unpreconditional meetings with these quaint, but so agreeable despots .....

He’ll find (ooopppsss) Washington, and New York, and Los Angeles, and So On, .... will have been WHERE they got rid of their nukes.....

Thank you Barry Harry Obama.....

for being the only smart one of us.


17 posted on 07/19/2008 11:54:11 AM PDT by seanrobins (blog.seanrobins.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58; jveritas
Let us all make sure that we are consistent with our facts regarding the yellowcake. This was the yellowcake that was under IAEA seal, that we knew he had. Of course that seal meant nothing as saddam would have disregarded it once the already gutted sanctions were lifted.

There was 1.8 tons of enriched uranium (not to weapons grade but getting there)that was removed in June of 2004 that sent the un into coniptions. Apparently this wasn't under seal and no one knew Iraq had it.

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/1/13/70852.shtml

There is also the little matter of "The Bomb in my Garden" by Dr. Obeidi.

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/1/13/70852.shtml

Plus the nuclear weapons designs that Iraq had that gave the nyt the vapors.

http://iraqdocs.blogspot.com/2006/11/jveritas-responds-to-113-nyt-article.html

18 posted on 07/19/2008 11:57:18 AM PDT by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

We don’t build nuclear powerplants here because the environmentalists won’t allow it. Our entire energy policy is determined by environmentalists, who have no use for energy development.


19 posted on 07/19/2008 12:07:01 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Boycott Washington D.C. until they allow gun ownership)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

I agree. If it wasn’t for FR, I wouldn’t know of lot of things that have happened. The WH has no communication skills whatsoever.


20 posted on 07/19/2008 12:09:18 PM PDT by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson