Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mathematically Confirmed: There Is No Climate Change Crisis
rightwingnews.com ^ | July 16, 2008

Posted on 07/17/2008 2:03:05 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last
To: Free ThinkerNY

chill, oops, read later


41 posted on 07/17/2008 3:06:32 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LaurenD

Climate change covers everything; from -100% to 100%. Just one of those convenient terms that they like to use (instead of Global Warming which only covers positive temp changes). That’s all my post was meant to illustrate. :)


42 posted on 07/17/2008 3:07:24 PM PDT by Textide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: LaurenD
Water vapor makes up far more of our atmosphere than CO2 does and is far more efficient at absorbing and trapping heat from the sun.

While accurate, this is irrelevant. We're not adding water to the environment. In fact, we have no way to add water. There's already just about more water than anything else.

We are adding carbon. Doesn't mean the warmists are right, but we should try to be scientifically accurate.

43 posted on 07/17/2008 3:08:02 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. - A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
were pre-programmed with overstated values for the three variables whose product is "climate sensitivity"

Sensitivity derivatives are known to be, um, sensitive...

44 posted on 07/17/2008 3:16:52 PM PDT by Regulator (Obama = Mugabe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
At first, a few brave naysayers spoke out — only to be shunned, vilified, and ridiculed by their “peers” (and the sheeple). They were also thrown off the money train — which explains why many AGW dissenters with science backgrounds have been emeritus professors in related disciplines. They no longer have anything to lose.

Now that the tide is turning — a lot of young scientists will want to make their mark, by showing how wrong their theses advisers were.

There are probably tens of thousands of academic scientists, who are anxious to shake off the shackles of oppression (so to speak) and finally be allowed to publish the “truth”, as they see it. They will be further motivated by vengeance against the academic fascists, and bureaucrats that have held them down. Reparations will be demanded. (Only slightly exaggerating, here.) It will be fun to watch.

45 posted on 07/17/2008 3:19:33 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I write software for a living - I laugh when I read that ‘the computer models say”

the computer models only say whatever you tell them to say


46 posted on 07/17/2008 3:20:04 PM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

bump


47 posted on 07/17/2008 3:20:56 PM PDT by aShepard (Loose lips Sink ships)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I still think it is all Bush’s fault (sarc)


48 posted on 07/17/2008 3:21:04 PM PDT by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexanToTheCore

“When Prophecy Fails.....watch for some rally crazy stuff from the Global Warming crowd. Really weird stuff”

Indeed:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2045508/posts

- John


49 posted on 07/17/2008 3:23:07 PM PDT by Fishrrman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Hello John McCain and McCainiacs, are you listening?

Only to La Raza and Al Gore.


50 posted on 07/17/2008 3:25:58 PM PDT by freedomfiter2 (It's too bad I've already promised myself to never vote for McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

I wasn’t saying that we’re adding water to the atmosphere. I was pointing out how ridiculous it is to be worried about Carbon dioxide and the amount of it being put in the atmosphere by human activity when water vapor is something we DON’T put add to the atmosphere, makes up far more of our atmosphere, and more of a greenhouse gas.

Not only is everything I posted scientifically accurate but also punches wholes in the theory that global warming is caused by humans spewing CO2 into the atmosphere.

How can that be when water vapor is much more of an important heat trapping greenhouse gas? That was my reason for bringing up water vapor.


51 posted on 07/17/2008 3:28:28 PM PDT by LaurenD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: kevinm13
Algore will now have to come up with another scam to get awards and stupid people to pay him for speeches

No, he will be done and another will arise. I'm betting on asteroids or aliens, but they could try pandemic again. I think most are currently hoping oil will go to $400.00, but I don't think America will put up with it.

52 posted on 07/17/2008 3:31:39 PM PDT by Soliton (Investigate, study, learn, then express an opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LaurenD

wholes = holes........I have no idea why my brain did that.


53 posted on 07/17/2008 3:34:22 PM PDT by LaurenD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: LaurenD
"CO2 accounts for 72% of greenhouse gases"

Only if one excludes water vapor.

54 posted on 07/17/2008 3:38:51 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president! (it ain't over 'til it's over))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Reports like this are going to cause Cogitator to stay in his hole ‘til Groundhog Day or at least long enough to cobble together some more of his “proof” that us humans are roasting/killing the planet.


55 posted on 07/17/2008 3:41:21 PM PDT by capt. norm (Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Unfortunately, global warming was never about science. It is a religion, and will soon start enforcing stricter penalties on heretics.

In parts of Europe, the results of this study will be called (and maybe tried as) a hate crime.

56 posted on 07/17/2008 3:41:29 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevinm13

“Algore will now have to come up with another scam to get awards and stupid people to pay him for speeches. As if the facts that have been there all along haven’t been enough reason.”

He already is moving on to the “Energy Crisis” as of today.


57 posted on 07/17/2008 3:45:41 PM PDT by Laserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Time to check those instruments.


58 posted on 07/17/2008 3:48:05 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
"We're not adding water to the environment"

Depends on how one defines "environment".

In a number of locales there is a lot of irrigation coming from aquifers that have long time constants for refreshing - that could be influencing local temperatures though I haven't seen any real studies. Plus water in air concentrations are affected by air temperature and could be a major feedback to be considered.

59 posted on 07/17/2008 3:48:50 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president! (it ain't over 'til it's over))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Really?

I didn’t realize that. Thank-you.

I recently also read that CO2 only absorbs select frequencies of infrared radation. As you increase atmospheric concentrations of CO2, each increment traps less and less heat until it levels off logarithmically.

Another thing that the GW people are not answering (that I can find anywhere) is why temperatures have dropped since 1998 even as CO2 production has continued to increase. There are so many holes in their theory that their credibility drops by the day and yet politicians are setting policies that require all of us to reduce our quality of life based on this junk science.


60 posted on 07/17/2008 3:48:58 PM PDT by LaurenD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson