Posted on 07/16/2008 3:18:48 PM PDT by BGHater
Nearly everyone carries a cell phone and its hard to find one without that camera feature. Its convenient when you want to take that impromptu photo, but a Tri-Cities area man ended up behind bars after snapping a shot of a Johnson County sheriffs deputy during a traffic stop.
The cell phone photographer says the arrest was intimidation, but the deputy says he feared for his life.
Heres a guy who takes me out of the car and arrests me in front of my kids. For what? To take a picture of a police officer? said Scott Conover.
A Johnson County sheriffs deputy arrested Scott Conover for unlawful photography.
He says you took a picture of me. Its illegal to take a picture of a law enforcement officer, said Conover.
Conover took a picture of a sheriffs deputy on the side of the road on a traffic stop. Conover was stunned by the charge.
This is a public highway, said Conover.
And it was not a place where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy as Tennessee code states. The deputy also asked Conover to delete the picture three times.
He said if you dont give it to me, youre going to jail, said Conover.
Under the advice of the Johnson County attorney, the sheriff would not comment and the arresting deputy said he didnt want to incriminate himself by talking to us.
In an affidavit, the deputy said he saw something black with a red light which he thought was a threat. Conover was also arrested for pointing a laser at a law enforcement officer.
At no time did I have a laser. I had an iPhone, said Conover.
When you take a picture in the dark with Conovers Apple iPhone, there is no flash or any light that comes from the phone that could be mistaken for a laser.
In a witness statement by a Mountain City officer, is says the deputy asked about the picture rather than looking for a laser.
If you arrested me, wouldnt you take the laser? If you arrested me, wouldnt you take the camera? said Conover.
He expects these charges to be dismissed.
This guy maliciously arrested me, charging me with phony charges that he dont even understand himself, Conover said.
The American Civil Liberties Union would not comment on Conovers case without fully reviewing the allegations, but told us there is no law that prohibits anyone from taking photographs in public areas, even of police. Taking photos is protected by the First Amendment. Conover is ordered to appear in a Johnson County court on August 6th.
---------------------------------------------------------
Documents:
I agree there is nothing conservative about “cop hating,” but being paranoid about a police state is very legitimate, as Obama would love to impose one.
Hell, they’re regulating what kind of restaurants can now open.
Are you the old KGB’s #1 supporter?
Guilty of Contempt of Cop, fry him..........
No dog in the car. I’m just happy no kids were killed.
The only time I was involved with a thread that got pulled was a LEO thread. The invective runs high. I ran through a series of suggestions about using various tags such as “vehemence” under the ecumenical tag system for subjects such as this one.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2038869/posts?page=286#286
I, a middle aged white guy, was pulled over a year or so ago for “running a stop sign” where there was no stop sign. It didn’t take long for me to realize the two cops weres trying to egg me into losing my cool and saying/doing something stupid so they could cuff me, probably so they would have probable cause to do a drug search of my vehicle (they wouldn’t have found anything.) I stayed calm and they eventually “let me off with a warning” for the nonexistent stop sign.
I no longer consider the police to be on my side, and in any future encounters with them, I’ll be respectful, but wary.
In the U.K., a guy gets harassed for taking pictures of his own kids on a slide at the park. Here, a sheriffs deputy arrests a guy for taking his picture. It’s the cameras! Ban them, they’re dangerous. And that includes traffic cameras at intersections, cameras in police cars, and spy cameras along roadways. Outlaw them all!
If it turns out that there is no such law, people should drive by the cop and take pictures of him every day. Actually, he should be fired in that case.
No. Happens in Philly too. That was even crazier!!
http://www.nbc10.com/news/9574663/detail.html
You gotta know when to hold’em and know when to fold’em. If the facts are as indicated in the story, criticism of the LEO is in order. The actions and reactions of his superiors show that. There is nothing wrong with questioning this. If it were you, would you say “Yes sir” when ‘told’ to delete a simple picture on a public highway?
If the cops have nothing to hide then they shouldn’t mind public scrutiny.
“And there is nothing conservative about cop hating and police state paranoia.”
That’s what they kept telling the Jews in Nazi Germany.
Hank
If a police officer is doing something that he doesn’t want a citizen to photograph, he probably shouldn’t be doing it.
so then I guess you think it makes sense to put their lives and indentities in jeapardy by allowing the possiblity of their faces plastered all over the internet?
If the cop made a false arrest he should go to jail.
That happened to me once. The cops followed me a couple blocks to my mother-in-law's house where I was dropping off my baby daughter. A couple of young rookies out to harass anyone. I got into their face and told them they were full of crap. Also that I was enroute to a meeting with police commanders and captains, and that they would hear of this (I was a civilian working for the PD), and named names. They went pale, got back into their car and left pronto. There's good cops, and unfortunately some bad eggs.
This guy was a traffic cop for crying out loud. You’re making it seem like taking a picture of him was because he was an undercover narco cop.....It doesn’t wash....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.