Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

The pay day is not my first concern here, [Disgusting that it is even in your list.]

but what other recourse is there for someone to take, [There are plenty; Ignorance is your excuse]

when they think their rights have been violated? [Please enumerate the "rights."]

This woman didn't go into the hospital seeking to entice this physician into putting a tattoo on her without her permission.
[A "Sharpie" Mark.  Calling Captain Hyperbole; poor sentence structure or contradicted?]

She went into the hospital seeking relief from pain. [Liar, he went for a surgical procedure]

She put her trust in the physician to do only what he was supposed to do, and he betrayed that trust. [Sanctimony; We should call him Doctor Taliban]

This guy gets a kick out of knowing he had his hands in women's private areas.
[Liar]

He likes to run into them in public settings having both know that he has had his hands in their private places. [Liar]

Somehow it isn't quite good enough for him to run into them knowing he has given them relief from pain, and that they live a better life for him having done good work.  [Liar]

Instead he needs to know where he tagged them, and he needs to know they know where he tagged them.  [Liar]

That is a fetish.  It is improper. [You are a truth-teller, in Fantasyland]

This is not the first woman he has done this to. 
[Liar, the report doesn't mention other women, and could've all heretofor been men]

His own attorney admits he's been doing this for some time.  [And he now has his first run-in with a liberal, trash, or gold-digger]

It's my take that this is not the first complaint.  [Everybody, including the board of NJ and attorney's cogniscent of perjury disagree with you]

It is the first complaint that has hit the courts and the papers. [Liar]

Some women are very private.  They are very uncomfortable declothing in front of anyone other than their husband.  Going to visit a physician for a physical is something they tollerate, but they don't enjoy it one bit.

For this type of person, to have a guy put a tattoo under their bikini line, is imply unacceptable. 
[For her and her Pro Bono attorney]

And this person is doing something about it.  [Yeah, trying to get rich; it's the American way]

Who is it that exposed the health care industry to one more law suit?  This woman?  No.  It was a physician who has been trained, inserviced, and told repeatedly for years not to do anything even close to this. 
[Yet never formerly trained to recognize humorless cads such as yourself; he'll learn that the hard way though.  An important lesson - break the ice with the new patient with a simple joke; if they don't laugh or smile, fire them and tell your buddies - like the rest of the backwash of contemporary America, they're looking for a payday, and a little spotlight won't hurt.]

 See how easy that was to make it look just like the DU funnies.  Thank you for providing the material.

Later... 

135 posted on 07/16/2008 4:14:11 PM PDT by Harrius Magnus (I am the town square.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: Harrius Magnus
The pay day is not my first concern here, [Disgusting that it is even in your list.]  Patient rights comes first.  So yes I'm going to state that the pay day is not my first concern.

but what other recourse is there for someone to take
, [There are plenty; Ignorance is your excuse]  Can a patient convene a grand jury?  Can a patient file charges other than to file a suit?

when they think their rights have been violated? [Please enumerate the "rights."]  The patient's person is her own.  It is not the physician's to do with as he pleases.  He was given the right to conduct surgery.  He was not given the right to conduct art.

This woman didn't go into the hospital seeking to entice this physician into putting a tattoo on her without her permission. [A "Sharpie" Mark.  Calling Captain Hyperbole; poor sentence structure or contradicted?]  The tattoo was a peal and stick tattoo.  This was not a sharpie mark.  It makes no difference anyway.  Touching the patient where he did was a clear violation of ethics.

She went into the hospital seeking relief from pain. [Liar, he went for a surgical procedure]  "She" went into the hospital to have work done on a herniated disc.  If you have had a herniated disc, you'll note that they are very painful.  And yes, she did go in for surgery.  Very astute of you.

She put her trust in the physician to do only what he was supposed to do, and he betrayed that trust. [Sanctimony; We should call him Doctor Taliban]  You don't have to like it or agree.  This physician acted uprofessionally.   This simply the facts.

This guy gets a kick out of knowing he had his hands in women's private areas. [Liar]  Well, that's my thought on it.  While it may not be the actual reason, it's not a lie.  It's my opinion and I am entitled to it.

He likes to run into them in public settings having both know that he has had his hands in their private places.
[Liar]  I must be hitting pretty close to home here.

Somehow it isn't quite good enough for him to run into them knowing he has given them relief from pain, and that they live a better life for him having done good work.
  [Liar]  No, the actions of his man prove this, for whatever reason.

Instead he needs to know where he tagged them, and he needs to know they know where he tagged them.  [Liar]  You're welcome to that opinion.

That is a fetish.  It is improper. [You are a truth-teller, in Fantasyland]  I'm telling you and everyone else what my opinion is.  If this guy wanted to do something cute, he could have done it by the surgical sight.  Even then it would not have been proper.

This is not the first woman he has done this to.  [Liar, the report doesn't mention other women, and could've all heretofor been men]  Well, if you want to believe that this physician places tattoos under the pantyline of the men he does surgery on, go ahead.

His own attorney admits he's been doing this for some time.  [And he now has his first run-in with a liberal, trash, or gold-digger]  I don't consider women who haven't had much intimate experience with different men in their lives, to be liberal, trash, gold-diggers.  We do not know she fits this bill, but we don't know she doesn't either.

It's my take that this is not the first complaint.  [Everybody, including the board of NJ and attorney's cogniscent of perjury disagree with you]  I did not say this wasn't the first criminal complaint.  I did say this isn't likely the first complaint.  And no, attornies do not have to acknowledge complaints that have not come before the court, when they state a person hasn't had any prior complaints.

It is the first complaint that has hit the courts and the papers. [Liar]  Would you like to link us to the other complaints that have come before the court or have hit the papers?

Some women are very private.  They are very uncomfortable declothing in front of anyone other than their husband.  Going to visit a physician for a physical is something they tollerate, but they don't enjoy it one bit.

For this type of person, to have a guy put a tattoo under their bikini line, is imply unacceptable.
  [For her and her Pro Bono attorney]  Sorry, but the surgeon did not have permission to touch this woman where he did.  He opened himself up to liability.  He broke the physician/patient parameters and he got called on it.

And this person is doing something about it.
  [Yeah, trying to get rich; it's the American way]  Did the patient include the hospital in the suit?  I don't believe she did.  It wouldn't matter, but the hospital has the deepest pockets.

Who is it that exposed the health care industry to one more law suit?  This woman?  No.  It was a physician who has been trained, inserviced, and told repeatedly for years not to do anything even close to this.  [Yet never formerly trained to recognize humorless cads such as yourself; he'll learn that the hard way though.  An important lesson - break the ice with the new patient with a simple joke; if they don't laugh or smile, fire them and tell your buddies - like the rest of the backwash of contemporary America, they're looking for a payday, and a little spotlight won't hurt.]  You're defending the defenseless here.  The rules are very clear about what you can and can't do.  And spinning this for mileage is pointless.  The guy admits to doing it.  His goose is cooked.

See how easy that was to make it look just like the DU funnies.  Thank you for providing the material.  Yep, I noticed alright.

Later...  than you think...


139 posted on 07/16/2008 4:43:52 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Annapolis, flight school, Congress, Senate, MIAs, Keating 5, Soros, Kerry... tried & found wanting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson