To: Bubba_Leroy
Syllabus
3. The handgun ban and the trigger-lock requirement (as applied to self-defense) violate the Second Amendment... the requirement that any lawful firearm in the home be disassembled or bound by a trigger lock makes it impossible for citizens to use arms for the core lawful purpose of self-defense and is hence unconstitutional. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Syllabus
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL. v. HELLER
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 07–290.
Argued March 18, 2008—Decided June 26, 2008
128 posted on
07/15/2008 4:30:57 AM PDT by
angkor
(Conservatism is not now and never has been a religious movement.)
To: Mariner; kAcknor; GovernmentShrinker; goldstategop; Squantos; Gilbo_3; GreenLanternCorps; ...
See #128:
"[T]he trigger-lock requirement ... is hence unconstitutional."
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL. v. HELLER
130 posted on
07/15/2008 4:44:18 AM PDT by
angkor
(Conservatism is not now and never has been a religious movement.)
To: angkor
Don’t worry. They said you could unlock and or assemble it IF you thought that your life might be in immediate danger. Wasn’t that nice of them?
189 posted on
07/15/2008 8:35:09 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson