To: Mariner; kAcknor; GovernmentShrinker; goldstategop; Squantos; Gilbo_3; GreenLanternCorps; ...
See #128:
"[T]he trigger-lock requirement ... is hence unconstitutional."
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL. v. HELLER
130 posted on
07/15/2008 4:44:18 AM PDT by
angkor
(Conservatism is not now and never has been a religious movement.)
To: angkor
I agree Angkor. I realized that when I read the article. You were right to point it out.
167 posted on
07/15/2008 12:06:17 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Annapolis, flight school, Congress, Senate, MIAs, Keating 5, Soros, Kerry... tried & found wanting!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson