Posted on 07/13/2008 5:45:04 AM PDT by kellynla
There are moments that throw the nature of America's enemies into the sharpest possible relief.
One such moment came this week, as the Army revealed that it had identified the remains of two US soldiers taken captive in Iraq.
Pfc. Byron Fouty, 19, and Queens-born Sgt. Alex Jimenez, 25, were captured last May after heavy fighting in Iraq's then-explosive Sunni Triangle.
The body of a third captured GI, Pfc. Joseph Anzack Jr., was found not long afterward - but Jimenez and Fouty's families held out hope for their return.
Until now.
It's the smallest of comforts that the country may now never know what, precisely, the pair endured in captivity.
Captured Americans in Iraq have been subject to all means of torture - including public beheading - in the furtherance of militants' sick propaganda aims.
Such brutality turned Iraqis against al Qaeda en masse - as soon as American resolve gave them the chance.
It also gives lie to the tired cliché that America somehow loses its "moral standing" by, say, keeping terrorists locked up at Guantanamo Bay.
That facility, of course, has been the subject of dozens of front-page New York Times profiles - alleging everything from stressful interrogation techniques to the violation of prisoners' religious sensibilities.
(This is the same paper, mind you, that devoted barely eight Associated Press paragraphs - on Page B6 - to the discovery of Jimenez and Fouty's remains.)
Left unsaid is that detainees - despite, as non-uniformed combatants, having no standing under the laws of civilized warfare - are given free access to medical care and religious accoutrements.
Not to mention, freedom to return to the battlefield - and kill Americans - provided there's insufficient evidence that they intend to do so.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
ping
Don’t forget the history
http://www.nypost.com/seven/10152007/news/nationalnews/wire_law_failed__lost_gi.htm
What kind of trial or court of protection were these boys given. Our liberal Supreme Court justices sicken me to death....
>>>http://www.nypost.com/seven/10152007/news/nationalnews/wire_law_failed__lost_gi.htm<<<<<<<
There’s something wrong with the “facts” of the above story. Something is definitely missing.
Iraq cellphone service is provided through a network built by Orascom (Egypt), MTC Atheer (Kuwait), and Wataniya (Kuwait). That’s it.
Why would an inter-Iraq or even a Middle Eastern regional call need to transit a U.S. switch? The networks of all three companies are strictly Middle East and Northern African regional.
It is nearly preposterous that calls on these networks “go through the U.S.” for local or regional calling.
God bless our troops.
You’re busy today.
“Youre busy today.”
not really...that’s why I’m posting as I read. LOL
back to the ol’ salt mines tomorrow...
I simply have no words.
No, I found some.
I’m having flashbacks, I guess that’s what it would be called. There, but for the Grace of God, go I flashbacks.
I am momentarily blinded by hate.
When the author speaks of a despicable enemy does he mean al Qaeda or the New York Times? Come to think of it, they are both despicable!
I’m thinking the intercepts would be sent, real time, to the US for translation, sifting, etc. I doubt field units would have the capability of doing this. Don’t know for sure, just my guess.
A well laid out article that cuts to the core.
I really don’t doubt you. I’m just wondering if the NSA would really want to work with (depend on) Egypt and Kuwait. I would think they have the ability to work around them...well I would hope they have the ability to work around our allies if need be.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.