Skip to comments.
Obama Refines the Blame on Iraq Miscue
New York Times ^
| July 7, 2008
| Jeff Zeleny
Posted on 07/06/2008 4:33:49 AM PDT by Eurale
ST. LOUIS Two days ago, Senator Barack Obama said he had not been clear enough in explaining his Iraq policy. Today, there was a different rationale. The confusion was not his fault, Mr. Obama said, but rather the medias for seizing on three words he uttered in Fargo, N.D., when he suggested he would be open to refine my policies on Iraq. I was surprised by how finely calibrated every single word was measured, he said, speaking to reporters as he flew here from Montana.
(Excerpt) Read more at thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: flipflop; flipflopflipflop; foreignpolicy; iraq; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
1
posted on
07/06/2008 4:33:49 AM PDT
by
Eurale
To: Eurale
Senator Barack Obama said he had not been clear enough in explaining his Iraq policy.He is so not ready for prime time.
2
posted on
07/06/2008 4:36:58 AM PDT
by
mware
(F-R-E-E, that spells free. Freerepublic.com baby)
To: Eurale
This guy is nothing but the same ole, same ole politician from Chicago, or he's a friggin' DOOFUS!
I suspect both the former and the later!
3
posted on
07/06/2008 4:37:31 AM PDT
by
sirchtruth
(Vote Conservative Repuplican!!)
To: Eurale
This is as Clintonesque as it gets.... The man is responsible for nothing, never has been, never will be.
God help the United States if they elect this fool.
4
posted on
07/06/2008 4:39:13 AM PDT
by
jerod
(They were pro-abortion, for gun control & wanted a cleaner environment at all cost - The NAZI party)
To: jerod
Think how close we came with Jon F’n Cary...
To: Eurale
I was surprised by how finely calibrated every single word was measured,...What the heck does that mean? That sounds like idiot speak.
6
posted on
07/06/2008 4:44:50 AM PDT
by
raybbr
(You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
To: mware
i think Obama has been perfectly clear on his policy on Iraq: he is committed to ending the war, NOT winning the war. that’s all i need to know.
7
posted on
07/06/2008 4:45:17 AM PDT
by
avital2
To: Eurale
I was surprised by how finely calibrated every single word was measured, Unravel the sentence: "...every word was finely calibrated measured". WTF does that mean?
Is it similar to the English equivalent; every word being carefully scrutinized?
8
posted on
07/06/2008 4:45:27 AM PDT
by
Dilbert56
(Harry Reid, D-Nev.: "We're going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war.")
To: avital2
I was just watching Fr. Jonathan on Fox & FRiends.
He was commenting on the differences between McCain and Obama's views on Faith Based Programs.
Fr Jonathan was very concerned with Obamas version, basically Obama takes the Faith out of the program.
Obama's version would make it illegal for them to discriminate against hiring.
Read that...you must hire gays,people who support abortion, etc.
9
posted on
07/06/2008 4:56:25 AM PDT
by
mware
(F-R-E-E, that spells free. Freerepublic.com baby)
To: Eurale
Oops...There goes the media under the bus. That is not the media I once knew.
10
posted on
07/06/2008 4:58:38 AM PDT
by
Pinkbell
(Don't blame me, I supported Duncan Hunter.)
To: Dilbert56
every word being carefully scrutinized?And what job does this man want? He's surprised that a candidate's words are "calibrated"?
Just words?
To: Eric in the Ozarks
Ah... but you didn’t vote for Kerry or for Gore, Clinton’s election in 96 was understandable and his election in 92 was a sad mistake of circumstance, because of that stupid old fool Perot and that other stupid old fool Larry King; Who by the way had no FOX news to counter his and every other liberals enthrallment at a third contender to help Clinton achieve a victory with 57% of the American people NOT voting for him the first time around.
They say this every election cycle; ‘This is the most important election ever’.... Well, this time they’re right.
If Barry is elected President, you will have a continuation of the Carter mindset... Do no harm, no matter what and with a world of Islamic Fascist looking to harm Democracy in any way they can, that’s hardly the type of President you, or the world requires at this time.
12
posted on
07/06/2008 5:30:53 AM PDT
by
jerod
(They were pro-abortion, for gun control & wanted a cleaner environment at all cost - The NAZI party)
To: Dilbert56
Looks like “word salad” to me. The sentence doesn’t make sense, but he strings toether some impressive words, doesn’t he?
Apparently, many are fooled and think he is a great orator. This comment shows that the real Obama strggles with language and exposes how naive he really is.
To: Bluebird Singing
please excuse all the typos - no coffee this morning!
To: Eurale
Give Obama a break. The man has 57 states to cover.
15
posted on
07/06/2008 5:42:21 AM PDT
by
Always Right
(Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
To: Bluebird Singing
The sentence doesnt make sense, but he strings toether some impressive words, doesnt he? That reminds me of a tee shirt I had years ago with this on the front.
I've been known to sling a
little bull now and then.
Occasionally, I like to
listen to a real pro.
PLEASE CARRY ON!
16
posted on
07/06/2008 5:55:23 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(A vote for any Democrat from BO on down the ticket is a vote for $10 a gallon gas.)
To: Always Right
The man has 57 states to cover.Obama's website does indeed list 55 states.
To: Eurale
In other words, he was against the surge and now is praising the surge as successful. Only now does he want to learn about it because hie is running for CINC. This also means he not only didn't want to talk to any “commanders on the ground” as a voting first-term Senator, he has little understanding and respect for the military leaders - the or now. Talk about triangulation for the sake of politics. This flip is a real flop!
18
posted on
07/06/2008 7:31:38 AM PDT
by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
To: jerod
Well...the Donks have done us one favor; they nominated the most compelling guy to vote against outside of Dennis Kusinich. Despite the lousy candidate on the GOP side, I still think this is winnable. Either way, we'll get a liberal in the White House.
btw, I'm headed for the Stampede this week...
To: Eurale; All
Is it me or is the NY Times is questioning their savior????
20
posted on
07/06/2008 8:21:58 AM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Barak Obama: The Candidate of Clarification)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson