We could do a lot more in the geothermal arena.............
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: Red Badger
The obvious conceit in some society being termed “oil free” or nearly so, is that they rely on other's use of oil.
Everything they cannot produce themselves is produced by “oily” nations around the world. So Iceland will be “oil free” and crisply “green” when everyone sits beside a geyser for warmth and catches fish from the ocean with their hands.
41 posted on
07/03/2008 9:29:33 AM PDT by
count-your-change
(you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: Red Badger
What about geothermal induced earthquakes? You couldn’t take too much of it near the surface without causing changes. The low cost/low hanging fruit is limited but I agree we could develop some new technologies to use more of it. Maybe slow motion robotic moles could be developed to run water lines at lower cost enabling some practical home heating and cooling.
43 posted on
07/03/2008 9:47:50 AM PDT by
Reeses
(Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
To: Red Badger
only water vapor comes out the exhaust pipe
if all the alleged atmospheric pollutants that are flying in the air today caused by coal and oil usage is replaced by water vapor, I have a nagging feeling that we just might be opening a pandoras box.
Overall, I can't see how artificially charging our atmosphere with water vapor could be advantageous to the planet. Look what happens to your bathroom walls, ceiling and mirror when you take a shower with the door closed........
To: Red Badger
We can do the same thing the Icelanders are doing, but with the understanding that nuke power would be our engine rather than geothermal.
If you favor hydrogen-powered cars, and battery-powered cars, then you have to be thinking about nukes. We should be building about fifty of them right now.
If you want to get off of foreign power sources, the immediate short-term answer is drill like crazy and build coal-to-diesel plants left and right. The long term answer is nuclear.
49 posted on
07/03/2008 10:22:02 AM PDT by
marron
To: Red Badger
Yea, unfortunately we don’t have volcanoes like Iceland.
57 posted on
07/03/2008 10:55:45 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: Red Badger
Iceland is not an oil free country, far from it. I spent a couple of good years there and while they have made excellent use of geothermal power and it has served them well, they are not free of oil. It is everywhere, they just don't have to heat their homes nor produce their electricity with it, the fishing fleet, the tractors, the vehicles still use it, it lubricates the geothermal machinery, and it keeps the weather at bay.
64 posted on
07/03/2008 10:12:03 PM PDT by
SeaWolf
(Orwell must have foreseen the 21st Century US Congress when he wrote 1984)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson