Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

We could do a lot more in the geothermal arena.............
1 posted on 07/03/2008 8:32:07 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Red Badger
The obvious conceit in some society being termed “oil free” or nearly so, is that they rely on other's use of oil.
Everything they cannot produce themselves is produced by “oily” nations around the world. So Iceland will be “oil free” and crisply “green” when everyone sits beside a geyser for warmth and catches fish from the ocean with their hands.
41 posted on 07/03/2008 9:29:33 AM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

What about geothermal induced earthquakes? You couldn’t take too much of it near the surface without causing changes. The low cost/low hanging fruit is limited but I agree we could develop some new technologies to use more of it. Maybe slow motion robotic moles could be developed to run water lines at lower cost enabling some practical home heating and cooling.


43 posted on 07/03/2008 9:47:50 AM PDT by Reeses (Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
only water vapor comes out the exhaust pipe

if all the alleged atmospheric pollutants that are flying in the air today caused by coal and oil usage is replaced by water vapor, I have a nagging feeling that we just might be opening a pandoras box.

Overall, I can't see how artificially charging our atmosphere with water vapor could be advantageous to the planet. Look what happens to your bathroom walls, ceiling and mirror when you take a shower with the door closed........

48 posted on 07/03/2008 10:20:19 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

We can do the same thing the Icelanders are doing, but with the understanding that nuke power would be our engine rather than geothermal.

If you favor hydrogen-powered cars, and battery-powered cars, then you have to be thinking about nukes. We should be building about fifty of them right now.

If you want to get off of foreign power sources, the immediate short-term answer is drill like crazy and build coal-to-diesel plants left and right. The long term answer is nuclear.


49 posted on 07/03/2008 10:22:02 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Yea, unfortunately we don’t have volcanoes like Iceland.


57 posted on 07/03/2008 10:55:45 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Iceland is not an oil free country, far from it. I spent a couple of good years there and while they have made excellent use of geothermal power and it has served them well, they are not free of oil. It is everywhere, they just don't have to heat their homes nor produce their electricity with it, the fishing fleet, the tractors, the vehicles still use it, it lubricates the geothermal machinery, and it keeps the weather at bay.
64 posted on 07/03/2008 10:12:03 PM PDT by SeaWolf (Orwell must have foreseen the 21st Century US Congress when he wrote 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson