Posted on 06/28/2008 4:25:45 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
Here is hard, irrefutable proof that the Obama campaign is engaged in a huge deceit related to what they are claiming is a copy of his birth certificate.
Notice on Obama's official site, his birth certificate says OHBM 1.1 in the lower left corner.
The original document displayed on the Daily KOS website says OHSM 1.1 in the lower left corner.
The million dollar question is: If the Daily KOS document was supplied by a Obama campaign staffer, as was reported, then how on earth can these two documents differ?
There may be a Hawaiian state agency or department with the initials 'OHBM', but I'm not aware of any.
The agency that you request a copy of a birth certificate from is the 'Office of Health Status Monitoring', OHSM.
The genie is out of the bottle now and it's impossible to "take back" the images. They are immortalized all over the web on different sites. Anyone can see this hard proof of skullduggery for themselves.
Note: Those who keep saying this is a distraction are missing a huge point here. It directly takes aim at Obama and his credibility. A bald-faced lie has been perpetrated on the American public. As far as this issue relates to Obama being a natural born citizen, I make no claims. But there sure has to be some reason for the deceit. Who knows where the trail will lead
-PJ
Or any Peace Corp Volunteers trying to help poor countries like Kenya.
We take our religious freedoms for granted and we can change our religion like it was changing our cloths.
In the Islamic world they don’t change their religion.
If your Christian you stay a Christian.
If a Christian converts to a Muslim; a Muslm stays Muslim.
Obama’s father abandon his faith to become Marxist Atheist.
That action made him into a apostate including his son who claims to be Christian.
Obama is one big security risk.
And many more Americans and her allies will murdered by the Islamic Extremist.
But try to tell the Obots that.
Thanks!
Both these images have a mark on the back showing through the front.
As far as I can see, it seems to read: JUN - 6 2007
It is the same on both images. If it is that date, it is probably the date these documents were issued. Meaning they are not THE original, but perhaps “originals” in the sense that they are subsequent copies of THE original issued by the original source. Or something like that.
Seems to me the discrepancy between the info in the lower left corner may not be material.
Did y’all see this thread?
Thanks!
IMO the blank photobucket birth cert is a scrub job of the Obama Smear birth cert. (I bet someone was being cute trying to show people how the Obama Smear birth cert could be cleaned up.)
The blank photobucket birth cert is not a scrub of the DailyKos one. (even though the claim is that the two, the DailyKos and Obama Smear are the same cert image)
The dailykos version is a better scan (deeper colors, larger file, more pixels, etc) than the Obama Smear version. Obama’s team may have used the dailykos image on the Obama smear website but they reduced the size of the file.
The Obama Smear version is too unclear due to the small file size to really look at like I have been doing with the Dailykos one.
ref:
Obama Smear one...
http://www.barackobama.com/images/fts/BO_birthcert.jpg
DailyKos one...
http://images.dailykos.com/images/user/3/BO_Birth_Certificate.jpg
Blank Photobucket one...
http://s100.photobucket.com/albums/m35/opendna/?action=view¤t=HI_birthcert.jpg
-PJ
You are overlooking one fact. Someone superimposed the black bar over the certificate registration number. That was probably done in Photoshop. That means the addition of the Photoshop EXIF Data means nothing except that the image was manipulatedwhich we knew already because of the black bar.
I would like to see more legitimate certificates of known provenance. The biggest difference seems to me to be the pattern of diagonal crosshatching in the border. Why are they so different?
This too good.
But loose lips sink ships.
Keep it under your hats.
I think the problem is only that on the fightthesmears site, it is only a low resolution image, so the “S” in OHSM looks like a “B”.
PhillyGuy1
Polarik, wouldn’t similar EXIF information appear if the image originated from a scanner?
- PhillyGuy1
who is the person put it on their photobucket account?
and where did they get it from?
Have you looked at this persons other photobucket pictures?
http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/daily-kos-an-obama-activist-and-forged-birth-certifications/
I'm sure there is more out there, and more to come.
-PJ
http://www.flickr.com/people/opendna/
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLG,GGLG:2005-33,GGLG:en&q=opendna
I see those marks on other areas besides where you marked the evidence for supposed seal... I don’t believe it.
Daily Kos, an Obama Activist, and Forged Birth Certifications http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/28/daily-kos-an-obama-activist-and-forged-birth-certifications/ Here is article with seemingly compelling evidence of fraud- Obama supporter had BLANK (except for same time) BC on the image hosting site.
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.