Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oil For the Tanks of America
Campus Report ^ | June 27, 2008 | Ben Giles

Posted on 06/27/2008 11:07:46 AM PDT by bs9021

Oil for the Tanks of America

by: Ben Giles, June 27, 2008

Witnesses at Tuesday’s Joint Economic Committee hearing stressed the need for a multifaceted, bipartisan approach to solve escalating gas prices.

Senators on both sides of the aisle used the hearing to place blame for America’s gas woes on the opposite party. Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-NY), committee chairman, set the tone of the hearing with his opening statement.

“With seven years under their belt, this White House has taken zero proactive steps to reduce our dependence on foreign oil,” said Schumer.

Schumer, who presented plans to lower the demand for oil, repeatedly discredited the Bush administration. He also took a shot at Republican presidential hopeful Sen. John McCain (R-AZ).

“It is a crime against our future that the White House and Republican Congresses since 1995 have opposed increasing fuel economy standards for so many years,” added Schumer.

Republican committee members countered quickly, first when Sen. Sam Brownback (R-KS) pointed to flaws in the Democrat’s primary solution to the gas crises: alternative energy.

“At the end of the day, you still have a gasoline-based system at the present time and into the near future,” said Brownback. “And you’re going to need more oil production and more supply.”

Sen. Bob Bennett (R-UT) chastised the Clinton White House in his opening comments, referring to the administration’s veto which halted legislation to drill for oil in the Artic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). The Republican’s solution hinges on increasing America’s oil supply.

“If indeed we had proceeded in ANWR at the time congress passed it,” said Bennett, “we would now be receiving from ANWR a million barrels of oil a day.”...

(Excerpt) Read more at campusreportonline.net ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: anwr; congress; democrats; drillheredrillnow; drilling; elections; energy; energysecurity; gasprices; oil; schumer; senatehearing

1 posted on 06/27/2008 11:07:48 AM PDT by bs9021
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bs9021

2 posted on 06/27/2008 11:09:39 AM PDT by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bs9021

““With seven years under their belt, this White House has taken zero proactive steps to reduce our dependence on foreign oil,” said Schumer.”

What an unmitigated ass. Anyone care to list all the bills that were shot down by the dems to get us to energy independence over the years?

And his plan is more regulation.

What a freakin idiot.


3 posted on 06/27/2008 11:11:27 AM PDT by scottdeus12 (Jesus is real, whether you believe in Him or not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bs9021
a multifaceted, bipartisan approach

The price of dilithium crystals is so high now, Captain, we can afford enough to only reach Friday and might not make the Saturday show this time.

--Scottie

4 posted on 06/27/2008 11:12:48 AM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bs9021

“At the end of the day, you still have a gasoline-based system at the present time and into the near future,” said Brownback. “And you’re going to need more oil production and more supply.”

800,000,000 fossil fuel based vehicles cannot be replaced overnight. It will take at least 30 years. (That is if the auto industry can get the ‘thermal event’ worked out from the battery operated autos soon. Do you think they want to put another dangerous product out there?)


5 posted on 06/27/2008 11:17:42 AM PDT by griswold3 (Al qaeda is guilty of hirabah (war against society) Penalty is death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bs9021

Hey schmucky, Clinton had 8 years, no? There you go! As far as I see it your all at fault. DRILL FOR OIL ON AMERICAN SOIL, nothing less is acceptable!


6 posted on 06/27/2008 11:20:26 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (IF YOU ARE NOT CONSERVATIVE BY 35 YOU HAVE NO BRAIN. W CHURCHILL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bs9021

Drill here, DRILL NOW.

Dumbasses in Congress...


7 posted on 06/27/2008 11:52:50 AM PDT by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Please visit for latest on DPRK/Russia/China/et al.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bs9021
White House and Republican Congresses since 1995

Wouldn't that be the year that Congress passed ANWR and President Clinton vetoed it?

8 posted on 06/27/2008 12:31:26 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottdeus12

““With seven years under their belt, this White House has taken zero proactive steps to reduce our dependence on foreign oil,” said Schumer.”

Schumer the tumor needs to say what his alternate energy plan is and when it will be ready.

The Democrats clearly like high energy prices and are doing everything to make them higher.

If the pubbies can’t win the WH, senate and house seats on the oil price issue, then we’re in big trouble.


9 posted on 06/27/2008 1:28:30 PM PDT by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bs9021

“With seven years under their belt, this White House has taken zero proactive steps to reduce our dependence on foreign oil,” said Schumer.

Um, look in the mirror, Schumer. NEITHER HAS CONGRESS! Where's our drilling in ANWR? Where are our offshore rigs? Where's our drilling in North Dakota? Where are our nuclear reactors and coal? Where are the lower gas prices and energy independence that Nancy Pelosi promised us two years ago? Oh, that's right. Congress shot them all down.
10 posted on 06/27/2008 2:08:39 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G8 Diplomat
Where's our drilling in North Dakota?

Just for clarification. Drilling is ongoing in North Dakota. Most of the Bakken Field is below private land and has not been held up by Congress. There is quite a bit of drilling going into this field and has been going on for a few years.

But this type of formation doesn't produce gushers and is not cheap to drill. It is being produced but this field isn't going to jump our domestic production up by several MMBPD in a couple months.

11 posted on 06/28/2008 5:04:28 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson