Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

It pretty much clarifies that RKBA is not in any way dependent on a military function.

So an 86 year old grandma who lives alone can lawfully protect herself.

I see the licensing issue as being somewhat moot now. What this means to me is that the burden of proof to show that someone may be part of some type of class who would not be allowed is shifted - that class must be clearly and meaningfully defined, and somehow posted in a way that it is common knowledge.

There has to be affirmative, undeniable, reasonable grounds to ever deny RKBA.


658 posted on 06/26/2008 8:17:34 AM PDT by djf (I don't believe in perpetual motion. Perpetual mutton, that's another thing entirely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 624 | View Replies ]


To: djf

Which is good. I like that also.


815 posted on 06/26/2008 10:05:12 AM PDT by DoughtyOne ( I say no to the Hillary Clinton wing of the Republican party. Not now or ever, John McCain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 658 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson