Skip to comments.
US to carry on military trials at Guantanamo despite ruling
afb via yahoo ^
| 6/24/08
| Fanny Carrier
Posted on 06/24/2008 10:08:37 AM PDT by mathprof
Hearings for terror suspects before US military tribunals in Guantanamo are going ahead despite a Supreme Court ruling that affirmed detainees have a right to challenge their detention in a civilian court.
Legal experts had described the high court's decision as the death knell of the special tribunals created by President George W. Bush and his Republican allies in Congress to try "war on terror" suspects.
But Justice Department chief Michael Mukasey said the controversial tribunals at the US naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba would continue their work and last week, two preliminary hearings were held as scheduled.
The hearings focused on Omar Khadr, a Canadian, and Mohammed Jawad, an Afghan, both detained in Afghanistan for having allegedly thrown grenades when they were still teenagers.
Jawad, whose trial date was set for October 8, reportedly used his hearing to denounce his treatment, alleging during a two-week period US guards changed his cell every two hours to prevent him from sleeping, a technique dubbed the "frequent flyer-program."
Meanwhile a three-judge panel in federal court on Friday declined to intervene in the Khadr case in an appeal that focused on a procedural dispute.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: enemycombatants; gimo; gitmo; judiciary; militarycommissions; supremecourt
1
posted on
06/24/2008 10:08:37 AM PDT
by
mathprof
To: mathprof
2
posted on
06/24/2008 10:11:22 AM PDT
by
SolidWood
(Refusal to vote for McCain is active support of Obama. Period.)
To: mathprof
3
posted on
06/24/2008 10:12:08 AM PDT
by
Signalman
To: mathprof
Let’s see SCOTUS enforce their ruling.
4
posted on
06/24/2008 10:14:15 AM PDT
by
papertyger
(Gun control laws make as much sense as giving condoms to a pregnant teen.)
To: mathprof
Looking forward to when they go from ‘hearings’ to ‘hangings’.
5
posted on
06/24/2008 10:17:30 AM PDT
by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: mathprof
Legal experts had described the high court's decision as the death knell of the special tribunals created by President George W. Bush and his Republican allies in Congress to try "war on terror" suspects. You'd think President Bush and the Republicans were the frickkin' enemy.
6
posted on
06/24/2008 10:20:58 AM PDT
by
HoosierHawk
(Hypocrisy does not apply to liberals.)
To: mathprof
"detained in Afghanistan for having allegedly thrown grenades when they were still teenagers."This must mean its OK to throw grenades as adults?
7
posted on
06/24/2008 10:22:40 AM PDT
by
norwaypinesavage
(Planting trees to offset carbon emissions is like drinking water to offset rising ocean levels)
To: HoosierHawk
Uhh, when the Congress passes a bill and the President signs it that creates the "law of the land". All the USSC was talking about was a court procedure.
Habeus Corpus is no excuse to stop due process of law.
8
posted on
06/24/2008 10:26:47 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
(We need a "Gastank For America" to win back Congress)
To: mathprof
9
posted on
06/24/2008 10:33:49 AM PDT
by
relictele
(Web addicts anonymous meets here 24/7)
To: mathprof
Titt meet Tatt.
10
posted on
06/24/2008 10:35:40 AM PDT
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: mathprof
Take all the gitmo prisoners to new york in one group and let some leftwing federal judge release them onto the streets of new york city. Methinks the left would forget about habeus corpus real fast.
To: mathprof
This article implies that the law is being broken. I don't believe that there was anything in the SCOTUS ruling that stopped military hearings.
12
posted on
06/24/2008 10:42:48 AM PDT
by
kidd
To: mathprof
Our military will adapt - and will just kill terrorists instead of capturing them (or turn them over to the locals for some local justice)...!
|
|
|
13
posted on
06/24/2008 11:33:17 AM PDT
by
B-Cause
(It's not what you gather, but what you scatter that tells what kind of life you have lived.)
To: Liberty 275
Why NYC? They don't have the means to deal with them there.
There are plenty other places that do, and are much closer.
14
posted on
06/24/2008 11:51:46 AM PDT
by
thulldud
(Congress does not want answers. They want scapegoats. (andy58-in-nh))
To: mathprof
We (the USofA) are too afraid to do the right thing, so we hide behind the Courts.
The Right Thing is to hang or shoot (by firing squad) individuals guilty of heinous crimes, including war crimes, rape, murder, child molestation, selling drugs, etc.
The Right Thing is to guard our borders and shoot to kill anyone breaking and entering to steal our resources.
McCain doesn’t agree with me, nor does Lindsey Graham, but it would only take a few public hangings for certain activities suddenly to become unpopular.
Barring that, no one listened to me when I suggested a few well placed H-bombs in the Middle East, specifically Iraq, either.
I’m not angry, I am just sick and tired of idiots allowing other idiots to ruin our society and to harm innocent people and morally weak people.
15
posted on
06/24/2008 11:56:51 AM PDT
by
HighlyOpinionated
(http://auntiecoosa.blogspot.com -- read, learn, blog, or get out of my way.)
To: mathprof
I’m sure there are five SCOTUS justices with skid marks on their shorts right about now.
This eventuality was one reason why the court should have thought long and hard about it’s decision.
Are we going to have a situation where federal marshals take on the U.S. Military at a military base on foreign soil?
Popping popcorn as I type...
16
posted on
06/24/2008 12:02:55 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
( I say no to the Hillary Clinton wing of the Republican party. Not now or ever, John McCain...)
To: DoughtyOne
17
posted on
06/24/2008 12:37:09 PM PDT
by
Dinah Lord
(fighting the Islamofascist Jihad - one keystroke at a time...)
To: Dinah Lord
18
posted on
06/24/2008 12:45:21 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
( I say no to the Hillary Clinton wing of the Republican party. Not now or ever, John McCain...)
To: mathprof
"Well, John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it."
Andrew Jackson
19
posted on
06/24/2008 12:58:18 PM PDT
by
Mariner
To: relictele
Thanks, I was looking for my other tube sock!
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson