Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is McCain coming around on ANWR?
RedState.com ^ | June 19, 2008 | Josh Painter

Posted on 06/20/2008 12:21:05 PM PDT by Josh Painter

In his townhall meeting here in Springfield, MO, yesterday, GOP presidential nominee-in-waiting John McCain indicated that he may be changing his tune on drilling in Alaska's ANWR reserve. According to the local Gannett fish wrapper:

For years, McCain has opposed drilling for oil in Alaska's Arctic National Refuge Area (ANWR).

But during today's town hall meeting, McCain said he'd be willing to reconsider that stance.

“I would be more than happy to examine it again,” McCain said.

It makes sense. McCain had also opposed increased drilling in the oceans off of our coastal states, but now he says that the people of those states should be the ones to decide whether to allow oil exploration and production off their shorelines.

The Democrat donkey is braying, "Flip-flop! Flip-flop!" Well, yeah, it's a flip-flop. But despite his years, McCain's eyesight is plenty good enough to read the handwriting on the wall.

Years of Democrat policies aimed at ending all domestic oil drilling in favor of renewables are killing everyday Americans at the gas pumps. Anyone with at least half a brain realizes that we're nowhere near ready for a wholesale conversion to alternate energy. It will take years for the technologies to mature, the costs to come down and the national fleet to be changed over from its petroleum base. In the interim, we will need crude oil and plenty of it. Since the stability of our present sources of oil cannot be relied upon, our nation's security has been put at considerable risk.

McCain realizes that the U.S. no longer has any choice but to develop its own dependable domestic energy supply and infrastructure. He's also politically astute enough to understand this:

McCain's position is likely to help him solidify support among conservatives, which political analysts say he needs to do to guarantee a strong GOP turnout in November. His position also puts him in line with Republicans in the House and Senate, who are pushing legislation in Congress to lift the ban.
And if all that were not enough, McCain's team can read polls, like this one:

A Gallup poll released in May showed that 57% of the American people wanted the U.S. to drill in coastal and wilderness areas. The percentage of Americans who bought Pelosi's line about price gouging fell from 34% in May 2007 to 20% in May 2008. It could be a winning issue for the Republicans and John McCain.
And this one:

A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey—conducted before McCain announced his intentions on the issue--finds that 67% of voters believe that drilling should be allowed off the coasts of California, Florida and other states. Only 18% disagree and 15% are undecided.
And this one, which shows that 81% of Americans support the greater use of domestic energy resources:

In pursuit of the immediate goal of energy security, clear majorities of Americans of every political and ideological stripe advocated the U.S. tap into its voluminous domestic energy resources, including the oil located off its coasts and in Alaska and the coal deep within its grounds... While there were some political and ideological differences, for the most part, Americans stood united in favor of a smart, practical energy policy that would allow them to drive to work and power their homes without breaking their bank accounts.
Only fools would buck such a strong trend, and indeed, the braying of the jackass is accompanied by a lot of kicking and bucking. Democrats, including their presidential nominee-to-be Barack Obama, find themselves in the unenviable position of calling for "windfall profits" taxes on the oil companies, opposing the majority of their countrymen who want domestic drilling now and choking on the tight collar and leash they so foolishly allowed the environmental lobby to shackle them with.

So McCain flip-flopped on domestic drilling. So what? The Democrats, while critical of McCain for changing his stance on the issue, have to try to explain Obama's flip-flop today on public financing of his campaign:

Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, announced this morning that he will not enter into the public financing system, despite a previous pledge to do so... Declaring independence from a "broken system" by breaking a promise. Obama hopes you'll care more about the former than the latter.
The bottom line is this: McCain is moving to get in step with conservatives and the majority of Americans on domestic energy production. Obama, the Democrats and the enviros are so badly out of step that they're not even marching in the same parade. If Americans go into the voting booth this November thinking about which political candidates and parties have been working against them at the fuel pumps, Democrats may yet snatch defeat from the bulldog jaws of victory. And that will be a stunning underachievement.

-JP


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: 110th; 2008; anwr; drilling; elections; energy; gasprices; issues; mccain; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 06/20/2008 12:23:04 PM PDT by Josh Painter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

I’ll believe it when I see the legislation. Till then all talk about drilling is campaign promises.


2 posted on 06/20/2008 12:27:07 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Voting conservative isn't for the faint of heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Not a nickle till he gets his head right.


3 posted on 06/20/2008 12:29:07 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

A repeat of his duplicity on illegal immigration.

He says he’s learned his lesson - secure the border. But now we find that behind closed doors he is telling Hispanic groups that he will institute comprehensive imigration reform (amnesty) his first day in office.

This guy is not to be trusted.


4 posted on 06/20/2008 12:32:33 PM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter
[ Is McCain coming around on ANWR? ]

-OR- is John McLaim providing a diversion to doing anything substantive..
A faint at doing anything to appease the GAS/diesel buyers/purchasers/users..

TO APPEAR relevalent but he against it.. as always..
IS John McLAim an APPEASER a WEASLE and political opportunist?..

... YES.. but has he finally become a republican?..

Well.. Duuugh.. (hands on hips, glaring demeanor)..

5 posted on 06/20/2008 12:34:05 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Yes indeed. Real leadership would have saw the problem at least four years ago and campaigned vigorously for drilling then. Now, it is obviously only the actions of a political opportunist, and fainthearted actions at best.
6 posted on 06/20/2008 12:38:23 PM PDT by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

He just might get a campaign donation if i hear this out of his lips with out hedging.


7 posted on 06/20/2008 12:42:19 PM PDT by ChinaThreat (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldbill

It’s sounding a lot like Border Wall Pt. II.


8 posted on 06/20/2008 12:47:17 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Voting conservative isn't for the faint of heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

He opposed ANWR drilling before he was for it?

Sounds too Kerry.


9 posted on 06/20/2008 12:47:38 PM PDT by Rio (Don't make me come over there....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

He needs to b poked with a cattle prod.


10 posted on 06/20/2008 12:49:12 PM PDT by kempo (c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter
“I would be more than happy to examine it again,” McCain said.

Help. I've feinted and I can't get up...

Actually, John McCain can justify the change of opinion by the now-critical nature of the energy shortage.

It will put the Dems in a nice bind for the election, but that's not the reason it's a good idea. It's a good idea because it's a good idea.

11 posted on 06/20/2008 1:00:15 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

The dems have created this crisis in order to socialize the oil companies and confiscate their profits and their property.

They’ve as much as admitted it already. I guess they figure it’s too late to stop them now.

No, we won’t drill, we won’t do anything. The Democrats and the attorneys and the judges will have to be shot and burried first.


12 posted on 06/20/2008 1:03:02 PM PDT by Dogbert41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rio

This is a Flip Flop that needs to be done. I could care less if the entire Congress Flips, it is the right decision. If you like $5/gal, Thank Congress in Nov.

Pray for W and Our Troops


13 posted on 06/20/2008 1:14:41 PM PDT by bray (Drill Congress!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter
Is McCain coming around on ANWR?

Uh, is this an Election year? 

14 posted on 06/20/2008 1:39:23 PM PDT by JoJo Gunn (Help control the girly-man population. Have the McCainiacs spayed or neutered.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
He'll tell the rubes on the right this BS and piss on them should he seize power.
15 posted on 06/20/2008 2:10:45 PM PDT by isrul (Help make every day, "Disrespect a muzzie day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

Why doesn’t McCain (and bo) just “visit” ANWR and see for himself how “pristine” it is? He could also see how little the actual footprint is compared to the vast area of ANWR. His arguments against bo not visting Iraq can be turned back on him regarding ANWR.

Anyone I know who has seen the area comes back supporting drilling there and drops the “pristine” argument. It is a dump!


16 posted on 06/20/2008 2:12:17 PM PDT by coldoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

The offshore thing could be taken care of by the Pres himself by his own authority, excepting where various States stand in the way.


17 posted on 06/20/2008 2:12:54 PM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: coldoc

McCain absolutely needs to get on a plane and get to ANWR immediately. I’ve been up there on the North Slope. It’s not a “pristine wilderness” especially in Winter. I would call it barren tundra.

He could win over a lot of people instantly if he went there and based on his visit strongly embraced drilling.


18 posted on 06/20/2008 2:31:22 PM PDT by News Junkie (Faith and Reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter
Freepers, do not call it ANWR! It is the Arctic Tundra Wastelands - ATW. There are no wildlife refugees huddling there.
19 posted on 06/20/2008 3:25:38 PM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Planting trees to offset carbon emissions is like drinking water to offset rising ocean levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

Good for McCain....


20 posted on 06/20/2008 5:39:20 PM PDT by The Wizard (DemonRATS: enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson