Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: woofie

I’m about 80-90% certain he is telling the truth. And judging be the coordinated efforts to upend him, including the folks at the site this story was taken from, I’d say he hit a very raw nerve.


16 posted on 06/18/2008 9:47:45 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: pissant

Well, one thing is for sure... Obama was pretty smart to have his relationship with a wanted criminal. There is no better way to destroy one’s credibility than to point to felony warrants for fraud. I still would like to see the press conference. I don’t doubt that Larry’s story probably is true. To travel to Washington, he HAD to have known he would be close enough to his Delaware warrant to run the risk of being arrested... Something I doubt someone would do on purpose...


18 posted on 06/18/2008 9:51:07 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (My Blog - http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com & NEW http://exposingobama.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

How long did it take Jennifer Flowers to prove she was telling the truth? ( I bet some liberals still think she lied)...and it took a room full of other women with similar experiences


19 posted on 06/18/2008 9:51:22 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: pissant; Lord_Baltar

The elephant in the room is whether Obama ever had any contact at all with Sinclair.

If that is true, then why are those who demean Sinclair because of his felonious, fraudulent background shying away from the story?

Why was Obama hanging out with a guy who had such a background? And if they did hang out, then what is unreasonable about sex, drugs, and alcohol arising from such a relationship?

And....where there’s smoke there’s fire.


48 posted on 06/19/2008 1:44:09 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Hi pissant.

No raw nerves here...in the last 4 1/2 months, we’ve put out 11 pro-Sinclair stories, 14 anti-Larry stories and (including today) 54 anti-Obama stories. We’ll let any objective reader draw their own conclusions about motives from those figures. If Sinclair had produced any evidence in this time, or if he had stuck to one story about many of the details, we’d have probably put out 30 pro-Larry stories. We’re not Obamabots—but we’re not anti-Obamabots either.

Our intense dislike for Obama’s positions was just not reason enough to blindly believe a seasoned conman. It’s going on 5 months and we’re still looking for someone to verify any salient part of Larry’s story.

But then, that’s easy enough for any one to check out.

Have a good one.


70 posted on 06/19/2008 11:42:58 AM PDT by mondoreb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

“I’m about 80-90% certain he is telling the truth.”

I am too. I still do not know what his arrest in DC is all about. He stated in the video about his case in CO and that he will be going to court to provide info and that he knows the case will be dismissed. Who knows? The guy seemed to me to provide enough information that could be checked out. Certainly the media that loves Obama will make sure that Sinclair is trashed.


82 posted on 06/19/2008 7:32:59 PM PDT by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson