What qualifies climate scientists to make global economic and environmental policy, other than the authority of their positions as scientists.
They are the New Inquisitors.
bttt
My old, distinguished professor was known for his position that it is the job of science to elucidate facts while it is the job of society to figure out what to do with them.
-- Dwight D. Eisenhower (Farewell Address, January 17, 1961)
Unfortunately, it appears we are slowly moving back to “Authority as Truth”, led by three distinct, but similar, forces: Socialism, Evironmentalism, and Islam.
Private property!!
The federal government owns vast percentages of land west of the Rocky Mountains.
Notice how much of that federal land has tightened private use. Conservation areas, endangered species areas, no vehicle areas.
And, then when the feds decide some land is necessary for civilization (private ownership), the buyers must procure other private land abuting federal land and swap it for or give it to the feds.
In the meantime, environmental communists are buying up private land and taking it off the market or turning it over to public management/administration.
yitbos
I had a discussion with my cousin about 18 years ago; I simply commented then that the scientists had become the new priests.
An excellent article.
Not only have some climate scientists granted themselves authority outside their area of expertise, politicians with a socialist agenda have backed this self-authority by claiming “concensus”.
A “consensus” has nothing to do with the scientific method (but it has everything to do with politics). A scientist who accepts concensus as support for a theory, or agrees that “the science is settled” has ceased to be a scientist.
Still, there may be hope for him, if he realizes that "the authority in this new model" is derived from sacred texts -- namely, the documents generated by the illegitimate practice of flagrantly un-scientific method. IPCC report, anyone?
An expert on physics is not automatically an expert on metaphysics. (Think Einstein.)
Experts in psychology shouldn’t be mandating actual legal standards of sanity (APA with transgenderism and homosexuality).
Yes, indeed it was--and is.
It requires a brutal dictatorship or oligarchy for its implementation and maintanence.
It inevitably destroys the economy.
And it has killed more people than any other ideology ever devised, including Naziism.
Any honest person with an IQ above 70 can easily understand and predict this.
However, millions of people are convinced that it will work--if just tried enough times.
The U.S. Democrat Party is Marxist. It's committed to Marxism. At its most reasonable, it is socialist. Obama and the rest of the Radical Left are stalinist!
INTREP