Posted on 06/17/2008 9:28:31 PM PDT by Red Steel
56 minutes ago
WASHINGTON (AFP) President George W. Bush will call on US lawmakers Wednesday to pass legislation lifting the ban on offshore oil drilling, the White House said.
"With gasoline now over four dollars a gallon, tomorrow he will explicitly call on Congress to also pass legislation lifting the congressional ban on safe, environmentally-friendly offshore oil drilling," White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said in a statement late Tuesday.
The announcement came just hours after Republican presidential candidate John McCain called for the federal government to scrap its 27-year-old moratorium on offshore oil drilling.
His demand tapped into voters' anxiety about sky-high fuel prices but his Democratic rival, Barack Obama, dismissed it as "political posturing" that would not help gas prices and might do much to ruin the coastal environment.
Perino said the president had long pushed Congress to expand the United States' domestic oil supply but blamed Democrats for blocking any action.
"The president believes Congress shouldn't waste any more time," she said, while adding that he "is not taking any executive action tomorrow."
The public gives a damn about avoiding oil spills and the like, so while pressing ahead with drilling keep couching the arguments GREEN.
DRILL HERE! DRILL NOW! ... PING!
You are absolutely right. However, it is laughable about the fact that most of the drilling will occur more than 90 miles offshore, and I do believe that we can contain any spill before it reaches the coast.
The Environmentally Ill are hypocrites. All other
countries drill at will without a care for habitats.
DRILL HERE! DRILL NOW!
NO AMERICAN OIL! NO CONGRESS PAY!
It's a pity so many have become so ignorant. They bitch about gas prices but balk about solutions. Public education I guess.
Drill Gaia’s brains out, drill here, drill there, drill everywhere, suck the earth dry then kick a liberal in the arse.
Oh, and one more thing, wind power machines off the coast of cape cod.
It may be laughable, but the fact is that somehow, someway anything can happen and I don't think it unreasonable to demand extreme measures be taken to prevent an environmental disaster from occuring.
We expect the same of the airline industry and impose stringent safety regulations.
What environmental disasters are from airliners?
Of course he is an expert on such matters.
Barack is another poverty pimp socialist asshole we just can't afford to be calling any shots. If we could turn his ears into windmills and capture the hot air from his mouth we might produce a few watts of power but it wouldn't much.
As Mr. Shakespeare once noted, ''If 'twere done when 'tis done, 'twere well 'twere done QUICKLY''.
FReegards!
How many ships sunk in WWII? How much oil/fuel was spilled? It had to be a whole bunch and somehow the oceans survived.
Big neutron belching nucular power plants in all the hippy havens *and* cape cod!
I was referring to safety.
You go, W., give ‘em hell!
A coal plant can be built in a matter of a few years to supply electricity to stationary structures like homes, offices, etc. While a nuke plant can take twice as long, and as always there are the issues of spent fuel rods that libs keep screaming about.
Oil is not the sole solution. It's the solution for mobile objects: trains, planes, autmobiles, and ships.
Too manty people are myopic and only focus on one energy source and realize that multiple energy supplies are needed.
If you like $5/gal, Thank Congress!
Pray for W and Our Troops
Keep going, W. Congress will buckle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.