Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oil From ANWR Would Help a Lot
http://online.wsj.com/public/page/letters.html?mod=2_0048 ^

Posted on 06/17/2008 4:41:31 PM PDT by hecht

Oil From ANWR Would Help a Lot In his June 14 letter, Charles Schumer writes that oil production from the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge "would reduce U.S. dependence on foreign imports by less than two percent." What? The production potential from the 2,000 acre coastal plain of ANWR is estimated to be one million barrels per day. We currently import almost 10 million barrels per day, so ANWR production could reduce our foreign dependence by more than 11%. Moreover, we get about two million BPD from Canada and about one million from Mexico, so the one million barrels from ANWR could reduce our non-North American imports by more than 16%. Somebody needs to teach Sen. Schumer how to use a spreadsheet. Richard Mirsky Falls Church, Va.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: anwr; elections; energy; politics; shumer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 06/17/2008 4:41:32 PM PDT by hecht
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hecht

If we showed the world we were serious about drilling, oil prices would drop significantly OVERNIGHT.


2 posted on 06/17/2008 4:43:45 PM PDT by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hecht

Correct me if I’m wrong, but this wouldn’t be American oil for America, it would be oil going on to the world market; the exchange. We don’t have state run oil, so there’s no guarantee where it’s going, right? Because, as bad as the price at the pump gets, I’m not crying the Socialist state-owned ‘uncle.’


3 posted on 06/17/2008 4:44:56 PM PDT by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hecht

If Schumer went to college I am sure his degree was that of an A$$!(cum laude)


4 posted on 06/17/2008 4:46:30 PM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hecht

Republicans have a winning issue here. Would be nice to see Bush get the ball rolling.


5 posted on 06/17/2008 4:47:01 PM PDT by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hecht
The “upchucker” (Shumer) is supposed to possess a genius IQ and to have had almost perfect SAT scores. This is definitely a case of advanced cognitive dissonance.
6 posted on 06/17/2008 4:47:54 PM PDT by trane250
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthWillWin

But of course they do. Democrats have wanted higher oil prices for many years. Now it’s time to hang them around their necks. Can the Republicans accomplish that easy task? I have my doubts.


7 posted on 06/17/2008 4:49:44 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (El Nino is climate, La Nina is weather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hecht

Democrats would give ANWR drilling rights to the Chinese before they would Exxon.


8 posted on 06/17/2008 4:49:51 PM PDT by Fair Paul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trane250

He’s lying but it’s OK....Trying to save the planet.


9 posted on 06/17/2008 4:50:30 PM PDT by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hecht

What is up with Schumer lately - last week he was talking about giving eastern europe back to Russia?

Doesnt he want us to compete with Russia oil oligarchs?


10 posted on 06/17/2008 4:51:13 PM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sax
...there’s no guarantee where it’s going, right?

Doesn't matter.

Even if ANWR oil went somewhere other than America, the revenue from that oil offsets what we pay for existing imports.

Furthermore, whoever bought that oil would then not be buying that oil from the existing world market, reducing overall competition for that oil.

11 posted on 06/17/2008 4:56:13 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hecht

Chuckles the Clown Ping

12 posted on 06/17/2008 4:56:55 PM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Not only are you absolutely correct, I would go so far as to say that if the White House AND Congress proclaimed that we were starting a ‘moon shot’ campaign to become energy independant by 2015, the world would see that the insane prices on oil are completely artificial and not the fault of the American run oil companies. And sadly, THAT TRUTH is precisely why the democrap party bastards will refuse to make such a committment for it would remove their wedge issue they use to manip[ulate the American voters. The democrat party is the precise reason we are in the trouble we are in now! Ask yourself how far back drilling in ANWR was proposed and whom blocked it and continues to do so. Osama Obama says drilling will not help for five years ... more than ten years ago drilling in ANWR was proposed and blocked by the same democrap party Osama Obama now represents. ... And if anyone is wondering, we could be energy independent by 2015 or at least 80% so!


13 posted on 06/17/2008 5:04:34 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hecht
U. S. Senate

U. S. House of Representatives

14 posted on 06/17/2008 5:05:47 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sax

We count all of our domestic oil. Whether or not some gets sold overseas, if you produced enough here to meet our needs, in a crisis we would be self sufficient. Further, our increased production will reduce world oil prices.


15 posted on 06/17/2008 5:06:59 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
I always point out that gas is $9.00/gal in Britain right now. It is $16.00/gal in Russia right now. How do you suppose the Dems will be able to blame that on Big Oil?
16 posted on 06/17/2008 5:07:18 PM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

Right, that’s my point. You’d have to tame the world market with our oil. I think too many people think, this’ll be American oil for the Americans.


17 posted on 06/17/2008 5:07:41 PM PDT by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

To qualify-American Big Oil


18 posted on 06/17/2008 5:08:06 PM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Williams

In a very real sense, our setting out to become energy independant would effect/reduce starvation in other parts of the world. But democrats don’t give a damn about whom they are responsible for killing so long as the killing empowers democrats. ... And if you doubt it, consider their defense and promotion of partial birth infanticide for empowerment.


19 posted on 06/17/2008 5:09:43 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hecht
when there is a 61 to 32 % willing to drill in ANWR and the poll is taken by CNN, the Republican better be more than aggressive on this issue.
20 posted on 06/17/2008 5:35:11 PM PDT by pennboricua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson