Skip to comments.
We're not going to pay AP's extortion fees and we're not going to allow them to control free speech!
Recent AP vs fair use threads ^
| June 17, 2008
| Jim Robinson
Posted on 06/17/2008 1:23:48 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 501-508 next last
To: reagan_fanatic
Who needs the AP anyway Boss
Good riddance to bad garbage.
61
posted on
06/17/2008 1:58:10 PM PDT
by
ArchAngel1983
(Arch Angel- on guard)
To: smithone
“Today Congress voted on a “
oops they will have to sue me too!
62
posted on
06/17/2008 1:58:42 PM PDT
by
modest proposal
(Obama 08: all aboard for the Moron Train to Hell)
To: Jim Robinson
Sounds good to me. Maybe I won’t barf so much now.
To: Jim Robinson
Damn,, well there goes that Obama thread on the september 10 mind-set and why the GoP hasn't gotten Osama yet. Oh well. ;-)
Off to the AFP wire. :-)
Hey, Jim? What about AP photos?
No problem worse case, always other fish in the sea.
64
posted on
06/17/2008 1:59:44 PM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE toll-free tip hotline 1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRget!!!)
To: Carry_Okie
Everyone should staart a blog and post one AP article per day.
65
posted on
06/17/2008 1:59:59 PM PDT
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . The Bitcons will elect a Democrat by default)
To: Carry_Okie
Everyone should start a blog and post one AP article per day.
66
posted on
06/17/2008 2:00:14 PM PDT
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . The Bitcons will elect a Democrat by default)
To: Jim Robinson
This is going to be difficult... so many news sites use AP stories. But I’ll dump the tea overboard with you, Jim.
To: Jim Robinson
Not to be the naysayer here, but isnt a major mission of this website to expose and counter the baises of the major news outlets, so as to prevent their spin from becoming the de facto truth?
How do they intend to enforce this unconstitutional policy? Have we no other recourse, such as not paying them? This policy of simply banning all AP articles sounds less like rebellion and more like capitulation to me.
No more speaking truth to pharoah. Pharoah proclaims, we stand mute.
68
posted on
06/17/2008 2:00:55 PM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: smoothsailing; jazusamo
Wanted to be sure you fellows saw this.
69
posted on
06/17/2008 2:01:02 PM PDT
by
RedRover
(DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
To: txflake
Majority of articles posted on FR are sourced AP. We can’t share AP articles on FR anymore? That would be the kiss of death for FR since we love to discuss Darwin Awards and guilty or not guilty comments.
To: Jim Robinson
71
posted on
06/17/2008 2:01:49 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(8 million views of HILLARY! UNCENSORED - put some ice on it, witch)
To: Jim Robinson
4 words? “...and, if, but, the....”
Does that count?
To: Jim Robinson
4 words???????
That is OUTRAGEOUS.
The commonly accepted amount is WAY above that.
To: Jim Robinson
Please note that I am using words contained in recent AP stories.
The words are;
extortion, inflated, ego, suicide and disaster
Sue me.
Cheers,
knewshound
http://www.knewshound.blogspot.com/
74
posted on
06/17/2008 2:03:44 PM PDT
by
knews_hound
(Democrats dilemma:Vote for a Nut with 2 boobs or a Boob with 2 nuts)
To: NormsRevenge; Froufrou; Lucky9teen; redstates4ever; swampdweller; AmericanMade1776
Caption This threads aren't going to be the same...
75
posted on
06/17/2008 2:03:46 PM PDT
by
weegee
(In 1988 Lenora Fulani was the 1st black woman to appear on presidential ballots in all 50 states)
To: Jim Robinson
76
posted on
06/17/2008 2:03:58 PM PDT
by
gidget7
(Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
To: PrincessB
Almost all papers run AP content, at least most I’ve seen - even on TV News websites and such... Sometimes there is no byline, and sometimes the papers reporters change some of the info and the byline then says; So-and-so with the AP. Other times you can only tell it’s AP content by the fine print at the end of the articles...
This is the most idiotic thing for them to do... They are going to end up marginalizing themselves even more.
77
posted on
06/17/2008 2:04:32 PM PDT
by
LibertyRocks
(My Blog - http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com & NEW http://exposingobama.wordpress.com)
To: weegee
They obviously want to make it harder to mock Barack Obama before this election.
There could be no other reason for this.
78
posted on
06/17/2008 2:05:10 PM PDT
by
modest proposal
(Obama 08: all aboard for the Moron Train to Hell)
To: NormsRevenge
Damn, well there goes that Obama thread on the september 10 mind-set and why the GoP hasn't gotten Osama yet. Oh well. ;-)
I wondered where that went...I posted a cute picture of Winnie the Pooh (Barry's WOT Plan). ;)
79
posted on
06/17/2008 2:05:19 PM PDT
by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
To: Jim Robinson
What upsets/worries me is that AP is the main news source for most of the “newspapers”.
Does this mean that FR could get nailed if we post an excerpt from an article found in an online local newspaper who used AP as it’s source/feed?
This, plus Time-Warner’s decision to test charging for bandwidth use, sounds a lot like we are fast approaching “Fahrenheit 451”. (With all apologies to Vonnegut!)
Am I just a paranoid old grannie?
80
posted on
06/17/2008 2:05:54 PM PDT
by
jacquej
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 501-508 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson