Posted on 06/13/2008 4:39:29 PM PDT by tnvol01
Proving just how important Barack Obamas new rumor-busting Web site could be, a Tennessee Democratic Party member told a local newspaper that the presumptive nominee of his party may be terrorist connected.
(Excerpt) Read more at elections.foxnews.com ...
Duh.
“That’s not the Tennessee Democratic Party I knew.” - BHO
“May be?”
“This isn’t the Bill Ayers I knew.”
Being the skeptic that I am, I’m starting to believe that Obama’s “new rumor-busting site” is where these rumors start. The same people who start the rumors quickly de-bunk them in an effort to immunize their boy against anything that might come down the pike. Typical Commie tactics.
A gaffe is when a politician tells the truth.
—Michael Kinsley
It’s nice to hear other democrats put the country ahead of their political party. This is something the democrats never do and it’s dangerous for the country. The democrats should have thoroughly vetted Berry a long time before they hitched their wagon to his train.
That's beyond the pale. He's no more than a sympathizer.
I would not doubt it.
well, who is it?
I’m surprised that a leading Democrat would say this out loud.
The money quote is the "terrorist" comment, but this is the quote that's scares the Obama "lightworkers" and the DNC moonbat cave to no end
"I dont exactly approve of a lot of the things he stands for" is bluedog democrat speaking out
And the problem with that statement is?
Did Bill Ayers not launch Obama’s political career?
And is the same Ayers not a terrorist who bombed the Capitol building?
I bet BHO strongly denies this one.
Interesting take on it. You may be right. Through his contacts with ACORN and other Chicago leftist pressure groups, Obama was schooled in the tactics of Saul Alinsky, who was one of the cleverest, wiliest, nastiest and most vicious Marxists ever. BO is not very bright and knows nothing about anything: except politics. He learned his lessons well.
A leftist attached to terrorists? How can that be?
RUT-ROW!!!!
Texas has also had that situation in the past, but I think more recently they've had only one party.
You find out these things when they come in asking for postage refunds after a campaign ~ first, before any refunds can be made (usually from unused advanced deposits), it is necessary to find out which party deposited it and which party is asking for the refund.
Democrats can be expected to lie about anything.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.