Posted on 06/13/2008 7:27:03 AM PDT by K-oneTexas
Sunset on The Clinton Era by Chris Adamo
Momentarily setting aside the tragic impact on America, should Barack Obama be elected president, it is nonetheless worthwhile to ponder the significance of Hillary Clinton’s announcement last Saturday that she is dropping out of the presidential race. To be precise, she is “suspending” her campaign which, considering the history of the Clinton dynasty, could indicate that in her mind, this contest is not yet settled.
Nevertheless, her announcement highlights an awareness on her part that, at least for the moment, she cannot succeed in a toe-to-toe contest against Obama. So despite the many ominous circumstances facing this country, heartland America can heave a collective sigh of relief. The nightmare of the Clinton epoch appears to be over. Indeed, Obama’s empty rhetoric about “change and hope” belies his intellectually vacant political philosophy. But in light of past experience with the Clintons and their reputation of promoting themselves at everyone else’s expense, almost any “change” would seem to portend an improvement.
From the moment she burst upon the national scene in 1992, Hillary Clinton displayed an understanding of the qualities necessary for political dominance in an environment where the law represents a mere obstacle to the aspirations and methods of the blindly ambitious. On more than one occasion during her Congressional testimonies, she all but challenged her inquisitors with her audacious “I do not recall” responses, mocking them and essentially daring them to resort to increase the heat in efforts to make her confess to wrongdoing.
As this facet of the Clinton scheme played out, the truth became completely irrelevant. Instead of matters being determined on the basis of facts, things degenerated into a battle of nerves which she knew she would win.
Clearly, she was the driving force behind the Clintonian strategy of flouting the law not only as a means of ensuring a particular end, but as a challenge to any who might take exception. In essence her actions announced “This is my plan. Interfere at your own risk.” Time and again, her method paid off handsomely. Few on the Republican side of the aisle had the resolve to stand against her. And as the impeachment debacle proved, those who attempted to do so were all too often undermined by fellow “Republicans.”
The most unfortunate aspect of the situation as it currently stands is that it took a Democrat to shatter Hillary’s concocted aura of invincibility. Midway through Bill Clinton’s second term, it became obvious that Hillary had her sights on the White House, and would stop at nothing to get there. Reacting to her telegraphed ambitions, much of the Republican Party has been running terrified ever since, essentially accepting the notion of her “invincibility,” and politicking on that basis, often at the expense of its own governing philosophies.
Throughout the final term of George W. Bush’s presidency, and particularly after the dismal 2006 midterm elections, much of the leadership of the GOP has been fixated only on one thing, how to prevail against the presumably unstoppable Hillary juggernaut. Had Republicans shown a bit more collective spine, and not let themselves be so intimidated by her now thoroughly discredited persona of political prowess, they might well have pursued a proactive agenda touting traditional conservative principles to much greater benefit for the nation as well as to their own political fortunes.
Even the field of Republican presidential candidates who ended up running, along with some whose names were floated for several years prior to the race, often reflected a myopic strategy of prevailing over Hillary’s “super candidate” persona instead of establishing a rallying point for real conservatives.
Among others, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was suggested, not for her leadership qualities or a conservative political philosophy that could resonate with the Republican grassroots, but merely on the basis that being a woman, she might somehow neutralize Hillary’s strongest (we were told) suit. In the process, Republicans forgot to formulate campaigns that truly embodied the winning Republican/conservative principles of smaller government, and support for the moral fabric of a healthy society that enables it to flourish and prosper without the intrusions of the nanny state.
Ironically, the entire air of Clintonian political radiance was, from the beginning, merely a media fabrication. Bill won his two presidential elections with less than half of the smallest voter turnout in nearly a century. And Hillary vaulted into the United States Senate merely as a result of Rudy Giuliani’s untimely bout with prostate cancer. Only a cowardly opposition would grant them political dominance under such circumstances. But, being the opportunists that they are, the Clintons recognized that such was precisely the nature of their Republican adversaries.
Many politicians lie, but the Clintons raised the behavior to an overt level previously unseen, even in Washington. Many politicians engage in shady dealings, but the Clintons flagrantly consorted with the Communist Chinese and their Indonesian surrogates, simply ignoring cries of outrage as literal bags of dirty money passed into their hands. And many politicians attempt to intimidate their opposition, but the Clintons did so by brazenly involving the FBI, IRS, and other federal agencies as they attempted to destroy any who stood in their way.
Washington, and indeed the nation, have been irreparably changed by the Clintons. The “hardball” politics of the past has given way to Congressional “debates” in which facts and truth are irrelevant. Conventions that recognized the need to stand unified against the threats of foreign adversaries have putrefied and degenerated to a level where in their quest for power the Democrats now voice overt sympathies towards America’s mortal enemies while castigating the U.S. military on specious and often totally contrived grounds.
So, despite the myriad of perils that the nation faces, it is nonetheless fitting that at this precipitous time, the Clintons are being unceremoniously expelled by the pitiless political monster they worked so feverishly to create.
Christopher G. Adamo is a freelance writer and staff writer for the New Media Alliance. He lives in southeastern Wyoming with his wife and sons. He has been active in local and state politics for many years.
I cannot believe people are so naive as to write off the Clintons now.
Sunsets are beautiful....in direct contrast to the most dysfunctional three people to inhabit the earth since Moe, Larry & Curly.
A better phrase would have been “drawing the final curtain.” Sadly it may not be the case as HRC trucks along in the Senate and we may face the harrowing prospect of a Chelsea candidacy in a cherry-picked constituency where we will be regaled with tales of how she’s been fighting for women, fighting for equality, fighting for health care etc.
In other words the cull may only temporary.
Chelsea warming up in the bullpen.
Obama needs to pick a non-Hillary VP soon so that if he has an accident she isn’t next in line. If she is, she will make sure that Bambi has the accident.
She’s going to be the veep, probably in charge of the health care task force again. so the clinton’s are far from done punishing this country.
“Few on the Republican side of the aisle had the resolve to stand against her. And as the impeachment debacle proved, those who attempted to do so were all too often undermined.”
Why was everyone so shocked then when she refused to give up regarding Obama? She was credited with having “presidential tenacity.” Instead of that it appears she is pathological in her stubbornness. Hillary must have been the inspiration for the movie the BAD SEED. She is like that little girl who must get her way, no matter what. We haven’t seen the last of the witch. She still holds a Senate Seat. Already I have heard talk from the media that she will become even more powerful. Let’s face it, she might even end up taking Howard Dean’s job. She is not giving up her delegates. She will use it for all it’s worth.
“I cannot believe people are so naive as to write off the Clintons now.”
Me, either! Her Heinous is laying low — regrouping. Clinton, Inc. is doing recon — gathering any and all info they can on B-Hussein-O — to be used at an opportune time.
I agree. She called it ‘suspending’ not ending or stopping. For her, it’s just 4 more years of patience and putting herself in the public eye (if she doesn’t leap in to rescue us as an ‘other’ candidate in Nov) and then she can run again, highlighting what she would refer to as either candidate’s failures as President. She’s far from over.
I don’t know exactly how it works if the President-elect, yet alone if he is still only the primary nominee, should have an untimely end, but I’m pretty sure his VP doesn’t step up.
FINALLY....someone has posted what I have been waiting for:
“I’m ready for my closeup now Mr. DeMille.”
Thank you!!!!
She’s not gonna be Veep
There is no rule as to what a part MUST do. But the presumption must be that if the duely elected nominee dies of heart failure, his wishes would be respected and the VP nominee would be the heir apparent.
This would mean that Hitlery would have to mount a legal-like challenge to the selected person over the dead body of the nominee. Talk about your Operation Chaos!
But I’m sure I read that the VP doesn’t become Pres if the Pres-to-be hasn’t been sworn in yet.
http://ap.grolier.com/article?assetid=0321150-00
There doesn’t seem to be a distinction made between president and president elect succession rules
Correct, A wild animal is never more dangerous than when cornered.
An example of the practical effect of the official status is found in the U.S. Constitution's provision that if the President-elect dies, then the Vice President-elect becomes president on Inauguration Day. That rule takes effect only after the meeting of the Electoral College. If the person unofficially called the President-elect dies before that meeting, then the Electoral College would have broad discretion to choose some other person.
And this (same Wiki):
At exactly 12:00 noon, on January 20 following a presidential election year, the term of office of the President expires by Constitutional mandate, and the President-elect becomes the President of the United States.The formal oath of office does not affect the automatic accession to and occupation of the office of the presidency, which, in the case of the U.S. President, proceeds, ipso facto, from the expiration of the predecessor's term.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.