Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clintonite rage could burn Democratic hope
The Denver Post ^ | June 8, 2008 | Susan Greene

Posted on 06/08/2008 12:41:18 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: Nonstatist
“People with Cankles” should be a new group for entitlement programs.

Every application for a job should have a box to check off...Cankles Y or N” .

Will we ever have a president with Cankles? Is the republican tent big enough for Cankles?

61 posted on 06/08/2008 6:52:51 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Obama’s reply to these women was as follows:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=SYkPpThfp7k

In my opinion, Obama does come across as very sexist. I’ve known for 25 years not to call a woman “Sweetie.”

He also came across as very condescending towards Hillary. I just don’t see how feminist could support him.

One thing that is 100% certain — John McCain has been far more respectful of Hillary over the years than Obama has been in the primaries.


62 posted on 06/08/2008 6:55:34 AM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ishabibble

What an election this will be! The winner will be determined by whether more Democrats hate the Democrat nominee or more Republicans hate the Republican nominee. Has there ever been another like it?


63 posted on 06/08/2008 6:57:57 AM PDT by RipSawyer (Does anyone still believe this is a free country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

I’m not comparing the two candidates. This female voter is exactly like the McCain haters right here on FR.

She and the McCain haters didn’t get their candidates so they are perfectly comfortable watching the opposition win.

A true conservative would go through hellfire to see that a marxist like obama wasn’t elected dogcatcher let alone occupy the White House.


64 posted on 06/08/2008 6:59:40 AM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA - Vote against the dem party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: surelyclintonsbaddream

“Find a Margaret Thatcher here and she could be voted in.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I believe that, in fact I would vote for a Thatcher type woman, I believe there are women who would make a good potus but I don’t believe Hillary is one. I also believe there are black men who would make a good President but I am CERTAIN Obama is not one. I am convinced that with all his faults George W. Bush has more ability than the entire Democrat party. Note that I am the same man who keeps saying women should not have the vote, I say this not because I think they are all stupid but because I see all too many who allow their emotions to rule over their minds and I consider Hillary Clinton to be a prime example. I humbly salute those who use their brains rather than responding emotionally to every question.


65 posted on 06/08/2008 7:10:58 AM PDT by RipSawyer (Does anyone still believe this is a free country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ImpBill; Carley
Mitch McConnel is doing extremely important work in one of those "three equal branches" of which you speak to shine the light on the watermelon marxism (green on the outside, red on the inside) of the cap-and-trade bill.

Unfortuantely, Mitch is a member of the GOP, and the only method of realizing the balancing power of the senate rules is with a solid, unified 40+ vote minority to block the road to tyranny.

You can rest assured that the enemies of the republic will always join together in a strong "coalition" party, and notwithstanding Washington's or Eisenhower's admonitions, you've GOT to have an opposition party for the designed-in gridlock to function.

So vote your conscience, but keep in mind that voting down-ticket is critical, regardless of how you vote for or against McPain.

Like it or not, if Obama wins, it will be called a landslide, he will be said to have a "mandate" for nearly anything shy of nationalizing industry, he will have large coattails in Congress, the popular perception will be that conservatism is dead, and there will be no political support for Congresscritters (like Mcconnel) to base their opposition to his policies or his Supreme Court appointees.

66 posted on 06/08/2008 7:11:55 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5

Amen!


67 posted on 06/08/2008 7:13:38 AM PDT by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I am reading all of this about how so many hillary people won’t vote for obama and how so many of the blue collar Dem’s won’t vote for him and Mccain is leading among Independents. what I can’t figure out is why national polls show BO winning?!?!


68 posted on 06/08/2008 7:20:16 AM PDT by bilhosty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Hehehhe...I like that headline...Clintonite Rage...hmmmmm sounds like the making of a bumper sticker! My next door neighbor is fuming over Hitlery’s lost. Don't know if she'll vote for McPain though. Liberals are so easily deceived by the OsAMAmessiah he'll take care of that!!
69 posted on 06/08/2008 7:21:20 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas

70 posted on 06/08/2008 7:27:06 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: lexusppd
They ARE moon bats, by your very definition.

Well there are moonbats and then there are MOONBATS!!...

71 posted on 06/08/2008 7:38:26 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard
Everybody who plays the "race and gender" game knows that blacks, male and female, are lower on the socioeconomic scale than white women (see what I learned from Sociology?

It depends. West Indian blacks in the U.S. are higher on the socioeconomic scale than their white age cohorts.
72 posted on 06/08/2008 7:45:55 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

ok ok, Obama’s got a weinie girly build. Now do you feel better, someone has dissed his looks.
Can someone tell these people to GET OVER IT?!


73 posted on 06/08/2008 7:46:41 AM PDT by Sparky7450 (Mistakes: It could be that the purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: verga; knarf; ComputerGuy

You three did an awesome job with your posts!


74 posted on 06/08/2008 8:04:10 AM PDT by freema (Proud Marine Niece, Daughter, Wife, Friend, Sister, Cousin, Mom and FRiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
THAT is the picture of a man who could kill.
75 posted on 06/08/2008 8:08:57 AM PDT by bannie (clintons CHEAT! It's their only weapon.; & Barry/Barack has two faces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: All
For what it's worth....The Dems have something on Hillary AND IT'S BIG...And if it ever got out...It would take out half of the top dogs in the party.

Think about Spitzer...All of a sudden, we found out about a 7 year old and running secret.....but I'm sure there were 50 people who knew....

76 posted on 06/08/2008 8:31:11 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (N)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ImpBill

I have only one priority. The well being of our troops.

Without national security we have nothing.


77 posted on 06/08/2008 8:43:21 AM PDT by Carley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine; Carley
I am certain we have much we agree upon.

National Defense is one such issue, however I am of the mind that we can never again deploy our military into combat without the Constitutionally required "Declaration of War". Without it the "politicians" have to much wiggle room to squander the mission of war; Victory in the shortest time with the lowest cost in men, materiel, and money, by the earliest total destruction of our enemy!

We had that desire on 9/12/01, but failed to follow through.

I don't know what it will presently take, given the situation we find ourselves, in the Middle East, but somewhere down the line if we are to really "win" militarily Congress is going to have to send a Declaration of War to the President for his signature, which will put the entire Republic at war. Then an only then, IMHO, can and will we do what is necessary to WIN!

78 posted on 06/08/2008 9:30:54 AM PDT by ImpBill (Hi, My name is Greg and I am a recovering "R"epublican! And I have recovered into a "r"epublican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Carley
I have only one priority. The well being of our troops. Without national security we have nothing.

Amen, Thank you for bringing that back into focus for me.

79 posted on 06/08/2008 9:32:11 AM PDT by verga (I am not an apologist, I just play one on Television)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: boycott

I wuz in a bar in EXTREME eastern MT a few weeks ago and got called Hon by the barmaid (~25 yr old) multiple times. It was kinda funny.


80 posted on 06/08/2008 9:35:33 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson