Posted on 06/05/2008 11:22:27 AM PDT by mojito
A judge declared a mistrial Wednesday in the case of a man who stormed into a Jewish center two years ago and shot six women, killing one, as he ranted against Israel and the Iraq war.
Jurors had indicated in questions posed to the judge that they were hopelessly deadlocked and struggling to determine whether Naveed Haq, 32, was not guilty by reason of insanity, as he claimed.
King County Superior Court Judge Paris Kallas ended the jury's deliberations in their eighth day.
The jurors reached a partial verdict on only one of the 15 counts against Haq, finding him not guilty of attempted first-degree murder of one of the women. But they couldn't agree on the lesser charge of attempted second-degree murder or any of the other 14 charges, which included murder.
Haq held a teenage girl at gunpoint to force his way into the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle on July 28, 2006. Once in the second-floor office, he began railing against US policies and opened fire when someone tried to call 911. He shot some people in their cubicles, some in the hall, and one, Pamela Waechter, fatally as she fled down a stairwell.
An emergency operator eventually persuaded him to surrender.
Prosecutors quickly announced they hope to retry Haq this year, and representatives of the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle expressed their disappointment at the mistrial.
"There is no argument Haq killed Pam. There is no argument he viciously shot five others. There is no argument that he made anti-Israel and anti-Semitic statements. Somehow, all this was not enough," said Jewish Federation President Richard Fruchter.
During the six-week trial, prosecutors did not dispute that Haq had mental problems and had struggled to make friends and hold down jobs. But he knew right from wrong, could tell what he was doing and wanted to get his message out, they said.
They noted that Haq planned the shooting for days, drove from his eastern Washington home to Seattle the morning of the shooting and hid in the building's foyer to avoid detection.
Haq's lawyers, however, argued that he had a long history of mental illness that had recently been worsened by a change in his medication. A defense expert diagnosed bipolar disorder with psychotic tendencies.
In written questions to the judge, the jurors asked for further clarification of the legal definition of insanity. Kallas declined to help them, saying she could not answer beyond what was provided in their instructions.
King County Prosecutor Dan Satterberg said none of the survivors of the shooting were looking forward to testifying again but would if that's what it takes.
"They have to think about their wounds, their physical and emotional wounds, every day," he said. "The experience of testifying made this a real emotional roller coaster for them."
Waechter, 58, was the director of the Jewish charity's annual fundraising campaign. One of the survivors, a pregnant Dayna Klein, took a bullet in her arm as she protected her fetus.
If found guilty, Haq would have been sent to prison for life without the possibility of release. While presenting his insanity defense, Haq's attorneys said he posed a risk to society and should instead be locked in a state mental hospital for the rest of his life.
The verdict (in this case, lack of one) would have been completely different if a Jewish person had attacked and murdered Muslims. I’m shaking my head, but I’m not even surprised. I wish I was.
I’m sure justice can be achieved wherever this islamic murderer resides if some play their cards right.
Sounds like some jurors believed the guy was insane
Amen..
Well, I guess in a way, the court got something right: Islam is a form of insanity.
Un-fricking-believeable.
From the story, this man may have been nuts and had a mental illness background but he was quite sane enough to plan and execute his crime, and attempt to avoid being seen, and also avoid its consequences to himself. If he could have, he’d have killed everyone in that building.
Personally, I believe ALL murderers are insant (well, except for the professionals who decided to make that their livelihood). So does that mean no murderer can ever get life in prison or the death penalty?
Obviously, what this man did was all George Bush's fault.
This reflects the state of public education in Washington State. The idea that a defense plea using the insanity defense is outrageous. For a jury to be swayed by such a defense shows the poor level of critical thinking existing in the general population. It is just this type of thinking that will allow for government to take away their freedoms once they have allowed justice to fail.
Well....if you create a friendly environment for these folks they’re thrive. Guess the people of WA and King Co. in particular don’t really care. Hope they enjoy it to the max.
Take it up with the State of Oregon.
Methinks there was at least one Muslim on the jury—holding out for insanity despite the facts.
Methinks you are right, Mr rbg81.
if they decide not to retry, dollars to donuts he's our of the mental institute pretty quickly....
if they decide not to retry, dollars to donuts he's our of the mental institute pretty quickly....
I don’t know. It sounds reasonable that there might have been a Muslim on the jury, but considering the venue, it might have just been a jury full of bleeding-heart liberals (who will generally side with anyone against either America or Jews).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.