Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christopher Hitchens on how we haven't seen the back of the Clintons yet
mirror.co.uk ^ | 5/06/2008 | Christopher Hitchens

Posted on 06/05/2008 8:15:54 AM PDT by neverdem

I have detested the Clintons ever since I covered the New Hampshire primary in 1992. The man I saw was not the silver-tongued charmer who seems to have bewitched so many people.

Up close, he seemed like a red-cheeked, piggy-eyed bully with a mean streak a mile wide.

And when he lied - which he more or less did for a living - he had a hard-faced little spouse to step into the TV studios to cover up for him.

This woman put up with A LOT from Bill over the years but could always tell herself it was worth it because in the long run the experience would give her the presidency she so obviously deserved.

Advertisement Over the years I watched this gruesome drama - the Clintons using and abusing the democratic process as marital therapy - until, the morning after this year's Iowa caucuses, it finally seemed to be over.

A good friend of mine wrote an exultant article saying Barack Obama had done us the huge favour of moving America into a "post-Clinton" era.

No more would the happy couple be able to inflict themselves on us. We were free from Lanny Davis and Harold Ickes and Howard Wolfson and Hillary's ghastly brothers and all the easy money riff-raff who had benefited from Clinton's last minute pardons.

As I read it I was hit with the queasy realisation I didn't believe a word of it. My friend Congressman Steve Cohen was forced to apologise the other day for comparing the former First Lady to Glenn Close rising from the bathtub in Fatal Attraction.

It's actually been more like a movie about an unkillable swamp creature or lagoon dweller.

And the morning after the last two primaries Lanny Davis was circulating a petition in the Democratic party to attach her to the Obama ticket.

"Good grief," I found myself muttering. "Is there no end to this woman and her overweening ambition?"

Well, THAT was a dumb question and no mistake.

Her performance in New York on Tuesday night was positively flabbergasting. Having won South Dakota, she congratulated that state on having "the last word"- while Montana's results were still being counted.

She congratulated Mr Obama all right but not for having won by securing the majority of delegates.

She let it be known that she would accept the vice presidential nomination without ceasing to count herself a candidate for the Presidential one.

And she demanded - wait for it - "respect" for the 18 million people who had voted for her. In other words, unless she gets a great deal of care and feeding and pampering, 18 million Americans will have been dissed.

The nerve. The nerve is really quite something.

In Washington yesterday, at the same pro-Israel podium at which Mr Obama spoke earlier, Mrs Clinton spoke of the man who has un precedentedly won the nomination as if he was just another Senator, like her, just another friend of Israel, like her.

There was a time one might have expected a Jewish audience to be asked to applaud the choice of the first black American nominee but Mrs Clinton couldn't find it in herself to be quite that gracious.

Indeed, if any one thing has exposed the hollowness and rottenness of the Clintons it is the almost casual way they have ignored their old black friends and allies to pursue a Clintonian version of a white backlash "southern strategy". Nothing is excluded if it serves the cause of the great entitlement.

From 16 years of polemics against this dynasty, I had acquired a huge shelf of anti-Clinton books and even written one myself in an effort to get the poison out of my system. For about 10 seconds after Iowa I thought of tossing them out. But now I think I'll have to hold on to my arsenal. I shall be needing it again.

Perhaps it's a Jaws-type movie I'm trying to think of. Like a Great White Shark, Mrs Clinton will never stop her relentless predations until the very end.

Christopher Hitchens is a columnist for Vanity Fair


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; hitchens; theclintons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: hiredhand

Ping.


61 posted on 06/05/2008 9:38:00 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ

That’s because Gore has no charm at all. He’s an arrogant weenie with know-better-than-you attitude.


62 posted on 06/05/2008 9:40:25 AM PDT by nicola_tesla ("Life is Tough... It's Worse When You're Stupid".... John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: y6162

Ha! Made me laugh.


63 posted on 06/05/2008 9:55:24 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (De minimis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: nicola_tesla

“Gore has no charm at all. “
I can hear his voice perfectly in my head. That eggs-agerated drawl!
“The Planet has a feeever! When your buy-by has a feever, you take it to thee dock-tor.”


64 posted on 06/05/2008 10:02:01 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Ax
I am very much afraid of the prospect of an Obama presidency. I'm almost glad I don't have grandchildren to worry about.

Carolyn

65 posted on 06/05/2008 10:09:34 AM PDT by CDHart ("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Ax
We all wanted very badly to see the end of the Clinton era and that appears - APPEARS - to be in sight. And look what we have in her place: the most inexperienced, ineffectual nobody that could conceivably be our next CinC.

We've traded the devil we knew for the devil we don't...

66 posted on 06/05/2008 10:09:55 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Ax
This brings to mind that old adage: “Be careful of what you wish for....” We all wanted very badly to see the end of the Clinton era and that appears - APPEARS - to be in sight. And look what we have in her place: the most inexperienced, ineffectual nobody that could conceivably be our next CinC. What Hath God Wrought?

And yet, he's still better than a Clinton!

And Obama's campaign ran circles around Hillary's.

And he did it without her "experienced" team and all her connections.

It must tell you something. It tells me something...

67 posted on 06/05/2008 10:13:47 AM PDT by GOPJ ( World Series - it's how many games are won, not total runs. Same for Hillary's "total vote" crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

That’s a pretty good summary...unfortunately.


68 posted on 06/05/2008 10:49:23 AM PDT by hiredhand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

WOW!


69 posted on 06/05/2008 11:11:15 AM PDT by red irish (Gods Children in the womb are to be loved too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dead; oldglory

Freeper OldGlory and I were there, too. You’re exactly right. bttt


70 posted on 06/05/2008 11:28:48 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (Driving a Phase Two Operation Chaos Hybrid that burns both gas AND rubber.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Good article, but I do think the Clintons are just about finished - the DLC is on its last legs and without the DLC, the Clinton have nothing to back them up other than their little circle of vultures (Carville, etc.) and their money. I said it in another thread - I don’t like Obama but I take delight in him taking over the DNC this morning - that must make Hillary furious.


71 posted on 06/05/2008 12:11:43 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

Holy sh*t that is so funny!


72 posted on 06/05/2008 1:58:33 PM PDT by Husker8877
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: aggie21
Dereliction of DUTY

Thanks....I'll look out for that at B & N.

Another winner is Gary Aldrich's "Unlimited Access". Like Lt. Col. Patterson, Gary was stationed at the White House during the Clinton years.

73 posted on 06/05/2008 2:05:00 PM PDT by Churchillspirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: astounded
The so-called MSM that foisted the Clintons on America just did again with Obama.

Yessirree. It was on display today with the non-news of Obama's buddy Tony Rezko convictions.

74 posted on 06/05/2008 2:12:50 PM PDT by Jacquerie (McCain will offer battle to Islam - Obama will offer our heads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Churchillspirit
Ive read Gary Aldrich's “Unlimited Access” as well, and recommended it along with “Dereliction of Duty” to anybody I met who supported hill during her campaign. Not surprisingly, nobody read them. (They were all thoroughly liberal.)
75 posted on 06/05/2008 3:15:41 PM PDT by aggie21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb

It is hard to agree with your comment on Hitchens about him sucking up to Billy Boy.

He had Clinton’s number early and was dammning him in his first term. By the time the Whitewater, Savings and Loan Scams and Sexual Harassment of an Arkansas State Employee was underway, Hitch was in full digust mode. With Monica, Hitchens wrote a book at the height of Impeachment called “No One Left to Lie To” that was a classic indictment of the Great Asprin Factory Bomber and has been has hard on Billy as on his great vendetta against Kissinger.


76 posted on 06/05/2008 3:24:58 PM PDT by KC Burke (Men of intemperate minds can never be free...their passions forge their fetters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg; YaYa123

I think he hates them almost as much as we do!


77 posted on 06/05/2008 5:02:46 PM PDT by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: supremedoctrine
Interestingly, if it weren’t for what we already know about HER character, she has seemed to be getting younger, more congenial, more “viable”, than her tired and jaded husband.

"The Candidacy of Dorian Gray"?

78 posted on 06/05/2008 6:00:14 PM PDT by Lee N. Field ("Think of it as...an eschatological intrusion." BLAMBLAMBLAMBLAM!! BOOOM!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

The Chicago Machine is part and parcel of the the Kennedy Crime Family.
Twin Sons of different Mutha’s.


79 posted on 06/05/2008 6:16:25 PM PDT by acapesket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Up close, he seemed like a red-cheeked, piggy-eyed bully with a mean streak a mile wide.

From afar, too. His true character came through the TV waves, across the miles, in every gesture and facial expression. How did so many manage to overlook these things? The same way they now overlook Hussein Obama's atrocious circle of friends.

80 posted on 06/05/2008 6:44:11 PM PDT by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson