Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking News from HillBUZZ
NoQuarter ^ | June 4, 2008 | Larry Johnson

Posted on 06/04/2008 2:06:50 AM PDT by AngieGal

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: Cowboy Bob

Thanks, I forgot about the Jena thing.

Larry Johnson is a lying nutcase.


21 posted on 06/04/2008 3:19:26 AM PDT by Bahbah (Typical white person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

“Well no he’s not. He’s not the nominee till the delegates actually vote at their convention.”

How could CNN, NBC, and all the other networks possibly make a mistake like that? Someone should let them know, so they don’t keep accidentally saying he’s the nominee. Although I’m surprised they don’t already know it since the convention happens every 4 years. It’s not as if they have a *motive* to lie about him being the nominee. Surely not.


22 posted on 06/04/2008 3:58:24 AM PDT by COgamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3
Why would you call her Mary Todd Lincoln? Mary Todd Lincoln lost three children, two during the WH years, had her family split asunder by the Civil War. She was vilified by the north because she was from Kentucky and yes, saw her husband murdered before her eyes. But she wasn't a hate filled racist. And if you talk about slavery it must be taken within the context of the times in which she lived.
23 posted on 06/04/2008 3:59:48 AM PDT by Misschuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
True. Technically speaking. Yes.

Journalists are getting very sloppy in their accurateness nowadays in current America.

They proclaimed Obama the nominee and his name has not even been placed into nomination. The same with John McCain, he is NOT the GOP nominee, not a soul in the National Republican Party in Convention has even voted for him yet.

That makes me wonder about the RNC. They publicly proclaimed on their website after McCain's victory speech, that McCain WAS NOW the GOP nominee, and exclusively promoted him as such on their website, even though there was no concession by one more candidate in the race who was pulling double digits in some races. I personally think that might be illegal, for the party which is to be neutral stating "who the nominee is" before the party delegates have cast their votes and it was officially certified by the Convention Secretary.

And then CNN has a headline, Clinton Will Accept To Be Obama's VP.

NO! Obama's Vice Presidential Candidate.

24 posted on 06/04/2008 4:00:49 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo ("President-elect" McCain Will Announce His Cabinet Bit-by-Bit To The Disbelieving Groans of FREEPERS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

>> no doubt he’ll be the one apologizing to the American people if and when it is.

That’s my fear.

A very beatable Obama, whose wife actually hands McCain the stick to beat him with.

And McCain too stupid, gutless, and imperceptive to use it.


25 posted on 06/04/2008 4:06:05 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (I've left Cynical City... bound for Jaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AngieGal
Her rant was fueled by the crowd: they reacted strongly to what she said, so she got more passionate and enraged, and that’s when she completely loses it and says things that have made the mouths drop of everyone who’s seen this.

So it's not a matter of ambiguity about whether she said "whitey" or "why'd he"? Was that other South Side racist, Dorothy Tillman, there egging her on?

In other words, we have a guy who started out his campaign pretending to be above race but who was attending a racist church for 20 years, is married to a racist wife, is buddies with a racist pseudo-Muslim Farrakhan, and who used his own 50% black racial penetrance for political advantage. He has sort of been the cuckoo bird of black American politics, growing quickly and pushing others out of the nest.
26 posted on 06/04/2008 4:07:35 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngieGal
She then launched into an attack on “whitey”, and talked about solutions to black on black crime in the realm of diverting those actions onto white America.

One would think that even if she didn't specify "whitey" that her solution to black on black crime should generate some outrage. Black and Black crime can be solved if they would just kill white people instead, I get that right Michelle?

27 posted on 06/04/2008 4:07:51 AM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
Okay, where is this proof? He’s the nominee now, it can be shown. Where is it?

Judging from the hillbuzz info, it's in more places than it was yesterday.

Oppo researchers -- and possibly some reporters who aren't brain dead -- bought up the TUCC CD's before they were taken off the website in March. The people who have them have been combing through the Wright sermons, but obviously weren't curious about the 2004 Conference (most are boring events featuring repetitious platitudes).

Someone took the trouble to watch the conference recorded on one of the CD's, and struck gold. When LJ started making waves about a "conference," those with the CD's began looking, and they found Michelle's rant.

Now there are more than a few people who have the goods, but what happens now is anyone's guess, depending on who those people are and what they choose to do with it.

LJ is something of a jerk, but I don't think he's lying about this -- there's just too many other people dropping hints about it.

28 posted on 06/04/2008 4:08:44 AM PDT by browardchad ("We are all mavericks now." -- Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AngieGal

The other days when the “quotes” from the supposed transcript were going around- one of the things Michelle pointed to was Hurricane Katrina- which happened in August 2005- this tape supposedly takes place in 2004...if it’s the same one. Are there more than one tape?


29 posted on 06/04/2008 4:16:15 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Misschuck

that she was a wife with a very different world view from her husband. I’m talking about the way it will be “spinned,” not the facts. They’ll need to grasp for straws in order to carry out the mission, “no news here, just move on.”


30 posted on 06/04/2008 4:20:18 AM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob
There was a post yesterday that claimed that Michelle said "what he" instead of "Whitey." Some of the statements were "What he done about Katrina," and "What he done about Jena."

There's been a lot of reverse spin put out by Obama supporters about what's on the video (most of them not too bright, from what I've seen). Keep that in mind.

This affair is becoming sort of like "double dog dare you," internet style. It's fun to watch, if nothing else.

31 posted on 06/04/2008 4:20:27 AM PDT by browardchad ("We are all mavericks now." -- Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Toadman

“The real Mary had a fairly reasonable explination for her craziness. She lost two children (one while in the White House). The nation was in a REAL civil war, and the possibility of losing her husband to asassination was very real.”

Also, her family was on the other side during the Civil War. That must have made for interesting family reunions.


32 posted on 06/04/2008 4:23:10 AM PDT by exhaustguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AngieGal
What's on the Michelle Obama Rant Tape?

Bush and Cheney are calling the Skull and Bones chapter of the Bavarian Illuminati to order. Elvis requests the floor, but Michelle is recognized by the chair first and delivers her speech.

Meanwhile, in the background, a group of scientists dissects one of the space aliens recovered from the Roswell crash site.

33 posted on 06/04/2008 4:29:23 AM PDT by steve-b (The "intelligent design" hoax is not merely anti-science; it is anti-civilization. --John Derbyshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no_pin_number
If this really exists, it seems like a better strategy to sit on it until one week before the general election in November.

They have to do that anyway. They won't actually have the tape until then. That's when the Great Pumpkin shows up to deliver it.

34 posted on 06/04/2008 4:31:03 AM PDT by steve-b (The "intelligent design" hoax is not merely anti-science; it is anti-civilization. --John Derbyshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
Really, even if there were anything to this goofball legend, anyone familiar with Cindy McCain's history understands that John won't -- can't -- go there.
35 posted on 06/04/2008 4:33:21 AM PDT by steve-b (The "intelligent design" hoax is not merely anti-science; it is anti-civilization. --John Derbyshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

if it really exists, it’ll come out long before then. I’m surprised it’s been kept under wraps this long. My guess is IF there is a tape, there’s something about it that casts doubt on the authenticity, and the people who have it are scared to release for that reason. I think one way or the other we’ll know something by the end of this week at the latest. My guess is that there’s nothing to this, just because it seems too convenient. But I could be wrong.


36 posted on 06/04/2008 4:35:47 AM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Yup, and he already went ballistic over an ad my state (TN) GOP ran recently. I noticed last night in that speech of his that he seems to want to set the tone of kissing the asses of his rodent opponents. We ought to be hell-bent on ripping out their throats. These are BAD people. Obama is a bad, likely corrupt, and dangerous individual who puts millions of Americans at risk. He harbors extremist, racist views that need to be exposed to the light of day. Unfortunately, Bob Dole (a man I have infintely more respect for and certainly has more Conservative bonafides) took such a tentative and milquetoast/polite route in 1996 that he blew a prime opportunity to run that Clinton cretin out after his single, destructive term in office, and McCain is following the same model and worse. Tentative almost never gets you the brass ring.


37 posted on 06/04/2008 4:35:52 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

>> anyone familiar with Cindy McCain’s history understands that John won’t — can’t — go there.

I don’t follow. Can you please elaborate?


38 posted on 06/04/2008 4:36:40 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (I've left Cynical City... bound for Jaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob; All
There was a post yesterday that claimed that Michelle said "what he" instead of "Whitey." Some of the statements were "What he done about Katrina," and "What he done about Jena."

Not "what he", "why'd he".

And I suppose it was based on this piece below from some left-wing site who were guessing about the contents of the tape themselves:

The Michelle Tape

by BooMan
Sun Jun 1st, 2008 at 11:57:57 PM EST

My old friend, Larry Johnson, knows about manipulating elections from his training with the Central Intelligence Agency. He doesn't want Obama to win the nomination for whatever reason, and he's in full propaganda mode to do everything he can to frighten the superdelegates. He claims to have a shocking tape of Michelle Obama ranting in some anti-white diatribe. He promises to produce this tape tomorrow [Monday, 6/2/08] at 9am.

From what I understand, it is a tape of Michelle Obama criticizing the Bush administration.

How you'd write it:

Why did Bush cut folks off medicaid?
Why did Bush let New Orleans drown?
Why did Bush do nothing about Jena?
Why did Bush put us in Iraq for no reason?

How you'd say it:

Why'd he cut folks off medicaid?
Why'd he let New Orleans drown?
Why'd he do nothing about Jena?
Why'd he put us in Iraq for no reason?

How Larry Johnson wants you to hear it:

Whitie cut folks off medicaid?
Whitie let New Orleans drown?
Whitie do nothing about Jena?
Whitie put us in Iraq for no reason?

http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2008/6/1/235757/2325

39 posted on 06/04/2008 4:38:30 AM PDT by ETL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Malsua

“Black and Black crime can be solved if they would just kill white people instead, I get that right Michelle?”

Ooo... Will Hillary Clinton now get to relive her husband’s Sistah Soljah moment? Wasn’t that “instead of killing each other, let’s take a day out and kill white people instead?” That would be full circle, and incredibly ironic.


40 posted on 06/04/2008 4:38:32 AM PDT by COgamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson