Posted on 06/03/2008 3:25:14 AM PDT by decimon
BOSTON — Nearly 100,000 Massachusetts taxpayers have been fined for failing to obtain health insurance, even as a major survey concludes the effort to create near-universal coverage in the state is meeting key goals.
Five percent of taxpayers failed to obtain health coverage last year, and more than half of those — about 97,000 — were forced to forfeit their personal exemption — worth $219 — after it was determined they could have afforded health care.
Two percent of taxpayers — about 62,000 — were found not to earn enough for health care, avoiding fines. Under the landmark law, taxpayers must show they are insured or face penalties. The numbers were based on a review of 86 percent of expected tax filers for 2007.
Gov. Deval Patrick said the fact that 95 percent of filers were insured shows the 2006 law, which mandates health care for nearly all residents, is making progress.
"We continue to put one foot in front of the other," Patrick said Monday.
A total of $9.7 million in fines was deposited into a trust fund to help cover the cost of the law. Monthly penalties for those who can afford health care but refuse will jump and could total as much as $912 for individuals by December.
On Tuesday, researchers released the first major survey of the health care law.
The uninsurance rate for Massachusetts adults dropped by more than half and residents were paying less in out-of-pocket health expenses, according to the report in the journal Health Affairs, which also found that low-income adults were more likely to have regular checkups and dental visits since the law took effect.
Researchers from the Urban Institute, a Washington think tank, interviewed 3,000 Massachusetts residents in the fall of 2006, just before the law took effect, and conducted a second round of interviews a year later.
Among the key findings in the report was the drop in the uninsurance rate among working-age adults from 13 percent to 7 percent. The biggest drop was among poorer residents.
Even among higher-earning residents, there was a smaller but significant decline in the uninsured.
"It's a very positive first year," said economist Sharon Long, the report's author.
Nearly 350,000 residents have been added to the ranks of the insured in Massachusetts under the law, which created a subsidized health care program for those earning less than three times the federal poverty level. It also created the Health Care Connector to help higher wage earners sign up for lower-cost, non-subsidized insurance plans.
The survey also found that people are paying less for health care-related expenses.
The share of adults reporting out-of-pocket expenses of more than $500 dropped by 4 percent, while the number of low-income adults reporting out-of-pocket expenses of more than $3,000 fell 8 percent.
Low-income adults were more likely to have a place to go when they were sick and were more likely to visit a doctor for preventive care.
Despite the increase in the ranks of the insured, the study found little effect on the use of emergency rooms for non-emergency care. And the fear that employers would begin dropping health coverage as the new law took effect hasn't happened.
Long said the study also included good news for policy makers: 71 percent of working-age adults expressed support for the law.
That will come in handy as lawmakers struggle to find ways to cover the soaring costs of the law.
"The continued challenge of health reform requires the continued support of the population and we find support for health care reform among adults in Massachusetts remains high," Long said.
In 2006, a legislative committee estimated the law would cost about $725 million in the fiscal year starting in July. In his budget, Patrick set aside $869 million, but those overseeing the law have already acknowledged costs will rise even higher.
Lawmakers are hoping to close the gap in part with a new dollar-per-pack cigarette tax.
"Our success has created a very big challenge for us," Senate President Therese Murray said.
The report was paid for by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, the Commonwealth Fund and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
___
On the Net:
Health Affairs: http://www.healthaffairs.org
Uh-huh.
I suppose this will be the role-model for solving this national crisis. How soon before this news replaces Jeremiah Wright, Michael Pfleger, and the unhappy Hillary supporters?
Shocking.
Big brother telling you what to do again.
You'd think people would take it that way but they keep voting for more.
So 97,000 people “bought goods” instead of paying insurance.....
So 97,000 people “bought goods” instead of paying insurance.....
Yes and of those 97,000, how many went to the hospital with a major health issue???? Who Paid for those services?????
If the taxpayers don’t like it, they must hate Mormons and Romney.
Is your health care provider denying you your right to cosmetic toe surgery? We at Mormons and Romney, the health care litigation specialists, have a 95% success rate in recovering lost due health fees, so call us today.
Hopefully that monthly fine will go towards their premium and they will then have health insurance. Making sure people are insured is the point of the law and the fine, isn’t it?
You have to take the point of the law in the context of the piercing of the point. Something like that.
Move the F*** out of the state. Same for Cali. We need to kick both their A***** out of the Union.
Well, I can afford $297 a year (fine) but not $1200 a month for health insurance for me & the wife. And, with heating oil doubling this year...... Answers anyone?
An interesting combination of socialism and fascism.
Socialism = transfer of funds from those who have to those who don’t have.
Fascism = government controlling every aspect of life.
More to come under Obama.
And how, exactly, do they determine who could afford health insurance but chose not to buy it? How many of those people are poor financial planners who have good income but still live paycheck to paycheck? How many have conditions which make the insurance insanely expensive to buy on their own?
It’s bad enough to mandate anyone buy health insurance, but to then trust the government to know who can afford what is ridiculous.
But the government is kind, generous and wouldn’t ever do anything wrong, would it?
Of course we can trust government. We trust it to teach our children, don’t we? /s
Yeah that will show em.. lol they cant afford insurance to start with.. so lets FINE EM.. lol stupid idea.. and hopefully this isn’t the plan with “Mr. Hope Hussein Change Obama”
In his budget, Patrick set aside $869 million, but those overseeing the law have already acknowledged costs will rise even higher.
Shoking!
Lawmakers are hoping to close the gap in part with a new dollar-per-pack cigarette tax.
Yeah, baby! More taxes will solve everything!
The report was paid for by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts
There you have it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.