Skip to comments.
Superdelegates predict quick primary end
Politico ^
| 6/2/08
| AMIE PARNES & CHARLES MAHTESIAN
Posted on 06/02/2008 8:50:45 PM PDT by Dawnsblood
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: Dawnsblood
Doesn't sound good for Her Thighness.
2
posted on
06/02/2008 8:54:27 PM PDT
by
2111USMC
To: Dawnsblood
“We want this locked up sooner rather than later,” said Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), who has remained undeclared.
I maybe wrong but didn't the RATS want this locked up much sooner than June 2nd?
3
posted on
06/02/2008 8:54:45 PM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: Dawnsblood
With only 31 total pledged delegates at stake in the two states, Obama cannot win enough in the final two primaries to reach the 2,118 necessary to clinch the nomination. I have a warm, fuzzy feeling inside that says this thing ain't over until August. Even if the Hildabeast concedes Wednesday it ain't gonna be over. Bank on it.
To: Dawnsblood
How awesome would it be for Hillary Clinton to win both South Dakota and Montana and then have Obama lock up a win?
Talk about stumbling to the finish line.
To: LiberConservative
You got that right. Note to Obama’s pilot - preflight the plane 3x from here on out!
To: LiberConservative
Absolutely.
Post of the day!
Hillary has invested millions of dollars into this, and there is no way she is going to back off after her recent and overwhelming victories.
My hunch is that she is going to temporarily suspend her campaign and save some cashola.
As August approaches, she will reveal all of Obama's dirty little secrets. Once Obama's character is totally destroyed, the Superdelegates will have no choice but to nominate her.
Better get ready for a long, hot summer of violent riots from Obama's people once this happens. Just my .02.
7
posted on
06/02/2008 9:05:08 PM PDT
by
Prole
(Pray for the families of Chris and Channon.)
To: Dawnsblood
House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.) confirmed that he will endorse Obama on Tuesday. What is with all the 'committing to commit' and 'announcing I'll announce' statements these days? Mostly Dem politcos, but some Republicans are prone to it as well.
8
posted on
06/02/2008 9:08:30 PM PDT
by
ApplegateRanch
(The Great Obamanation of Desolation, attempting to sit in the Oval Office, where he ought not..)
To: Man50D
“We want this locked up sooner rather than later,”
"this" being hitlery?
dems want to see her behind bars? so do i!
9
posted on
06/02/2008 9:40:23 PM PDT
by
robomatik
((wine plug: renascentvineyards.com cabernet sauvignon, riesling, and merlot))
To: Dawnsblood
Some day historians would say that Republican party was at brink of extinction and a Man named Obama saved it.
10
posted on
06/02/2008 9:43:00 PM PDT
by
The_Republican
(Ovaries of the World Unite! Rush, Laura, Ann, Greta - Time for the Ovulation!)
To: Dawnsblood
11
posted on
06/02/2008 9:46:46 PM PDT
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
To: Liberty Valance
buh-bye Hilly & the Billy!
12
posted on
06/02/2008 9:52:28 PM PDT
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
To: Dawnsblood
... Howdy folks ...
13
posted on
06/02/2008 9:58:09 PM PDT
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
To: Liberty Valance
... Howdy folks ... he looks right on... i love this President...
To: Prole
Better get ready for a long, hot summer of violent riots from Obama's people once this happens. Just my .02. Yep, the Beast ain't goin nowhere. Herself is simply unable to concede defeat.
To: The_Republican
Some day historians would say that Republican party was at brink of extinction and a Man named Obama saved it. Damn right on the first part, I would not bet a dime on the second.
To: Wally_Kalbacken
"Note to Obama’s pilot - preflight the plane 3x from here on out!" He'd be wise to stay out of propeller driven aircraft altogether...
To: ApplegateRanch
What is with all the 'committing to commit' and 'announcing I'll announce' statements these days? It's a way of hedging one's bets. It _is_ annoying. The prospect of nominating Obama seems to evoke a neurotic reaction from the superdelegates.
18
posted on
06/02/2008 10:10:15 PM PDT
by
Tea in the Harbor
(Diplomacy is the art of fishing tranquilly in troubled waters.)
To: Dawnsblood
They’ve been predicting a “quick end” to the primary since February. The dem party is a bunch of delusional morons who can’t even run their own primary, and they want us to turn our national security, healthcare, financial stability, etc. over to them.
19
posted on
06/02/2008 10:30:25 PM PDT
by
hsalaw
To: Dawnsblood
Regardless of who people "SAY" they are going to vote for, don't the Democrats have to actually "VOTE" at the convention before the results are official? After all, some of the superdelegates have already changed their mind about this, and any future developments between now and the convention could affect the actual vote.
Unless the Democrats are going to meet in committee and decide by fiat what the actual vote will be. I wonder if Dionne Warwick is in charge of that committee.
20
posted on
06/02/2008 11:31:55 PM PDT
by
Bernard
(If you always tell the truth, you never have to remember exactly what you said.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson