Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mocking of Clinton at Obama’s Church Reverberates
The New York Times ^ | May 30, 2008 | Susan Saulny

Posted on 05/31/2008 1:53:24 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Reverberations from the Sunday sermon of a Roman Catholic priest who mocked Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton at Senator Barack Obama’s home church here continued to spread Friday, after the priest offered an apology and the archbishop of Chicago gave him a public reprimand for “partisan campaigning.”

In a guest appearance at Trinity United Church of Christ, the priest, the Rev. Michael Pfleger, who resigned about two weeks ago from an unpaid position on the Obama campaign’s Catholic advisory council, delivered a tirade against Mrs. Clinton that included fake tears, a high-pitched voice and top-of-the-lungs screaming. He also gave a racially tinged critique of so-called “white entitlement,” of which he says Mrs. Clinton is guilty.

“When Hillary was crying, and people said that was put on — I really don’t believe it was put on,” said Father Pfleger, 59, the white pastor of a predominantly black South Side church. “I really believe that she just always thought: ‘This is mine. I’m Bill’s wife, I’m white and this is mine. I just got to get up and step into the plate.’ And then, out of nowhere, came, ‘Hey, I’m Barack Obama.’ And she said, ‘Oh, damn. Where did you come from? I’m white. I’m entitled. There’s a black man stealing my show.”

Father Pfleger, a well-known longtime activist and friend of Mr. Obama, issued an apology late Thursday. “I regret the words I chose on Sunday. These words are inconsistent with Senator Obama’s life and message, and I am deeply sorry if they offended Senator Clinton or anyone else who saw them.”

The Clinton campaign repeated on Friday, for a second day, its displeasure with how Mr. Obama has handled the situation, calling for him to reject Father Pfleger more forcefully.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; democrats; election; elections; hillary; obama; pfleger; trinityucc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last
Sounds like a Rovian plot to me, courtesy of the VRWC. LOL
1 posted on 05/31/2008 1:53:25 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I don’t understand why they don’t pull this church’s tax exempt status. They have clearly violated the law for a non-profit to avoid partisan politics.


2 posted on 05/31/2008 2:02:59 AM PDT by exhaustguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

As a Roman Catholic, I think Faher Pfleger should be sent to a remote island for about 10 years.


3 posted on 05/31/2008 2:04:16 AM PDT by sockmonkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sockmonkey

Perhaps he can be enrolled in a cloistered order with a vow of silence.


4 posted on 05/31/2008 2:11:00 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (All of this has happened before, and will happen again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

He’s probably a Pfag.


5 posted on 05/31/2008 2:15:18 AM PDT by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
the priest, the Rev. Michael Pfleger [...] delivered a tirade against Mrs. Clinton that included fake tears, a high-pitched voice and top-of-the-lungs screaming.

Sorry, I don't understand... Did Pfleger's tirade include "fake tears," etc., or was his tirade directed against Clinton's "fake tears," etc.?

Can someone help me out here?

Regards,

6 posted on 05/31/2008 2:18:56 AM PDT by alexander_busek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sockmonkey
"As a Roman Catholic, I think Faher Pfleger should be sent to a remote island for about 10 years."

The man is a lunatic. He's a Catholic Priest? WTF is in the water in Chicago?

7 posted on 05/31/2008 2:22:59 AM PDT by libs_kma (The land of the free, because of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek
He was pretending to be Hillary, crying that she was white and entitled to be president.

The whole tirade was a disaster, particularly when he went into his "Bro" ghetto voice. He should be ashamed of himself. He was playing to the black crowd, and succeeded in "whipping them up".

8 posted on 05/31/2008 2:23:49 AM PDT by FixitGuy (By their fruits shall ye know them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

“Sorry, I don’t understand... Did Pfleger’s tirade include “fake tears,” etc., or was his tirade directed against Clinton’s “fake tears,” etc.?”

Video clip of event:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_H11x6bMu4Y


9 posted on 05/31/2008 2:26:44 AM PDT by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1846964/posts

From lat year, for those of us who had not heard of this tool.


10 posted on 05/31/2008 2:37:11 AM PDT by don-o (My son, Ben, reports to Parris Island on June 30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

Watch the video of his sermon. He fakes tears, he screams and he acts out his “sermon” and puts words in her mouth and the mouth of all the “whiteys” that he says feel the same as Hillary. The video was available yesterday at Michelle Maulkin’s website.


11 posted on 05/31/2008 2:40:06 AM PDT by proud2beconservativeinNJ ("In God We Trust")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: frankjr
Dear frankjr,

Thanks for posting the hyperlink to the video. It was disgusting and embarassing. This "priest" was doing nothing but attempting to incite race hatred and social envy. His logic was worse than specious. It's rare that I stoop to such comparisons, but I would say that his base rhetorics were certainly on a par with anything one could read in Julius Streicher's Völkischer Beobachter anno 1933.

He deserves to be defrocked.

Regards,

12 posted on 05/31/2008 2:47:44 AM PDT by alexander_busek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: exhaustguy
I don’t understand why they don’t pull this church’s tax exempt status. They have clearly violated the law for a non-profit to avoid partisan politics.

Not really. They have violated an executive order of LBJ, never rescinded, that he put in place to punish someone he was running against in Texas. Such an order is as anathema to freedom of speech as McCain/Feingold.
13 posted on 05/31/2008 2:49:45 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Its not just Rev. Wright that is the problem...its the entire Church!


14 posted on 05/31/2008 2:52:47 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (McCain '08 : The lesser of two evils!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FixitGuy
He was playing to the black crowd, and succeeded in "whipping them up".

This is the one taboo subject nobody talks about, but what kind of people belong to this church? I mean, during Father Flakey's diatribe, you can hear the churchgoers laughing, hooting and cheering him on. There's even one guy in the background who seems to be having some kind of euphoric fit. The pundits have no problem condemning the ministers at Obama's church who spew this venom, but everyone avoids the fact the parishioners appear to revel in the hatred, as well. It seems Obama hasn't just failed to inspire a few looney reverends towards racial harmony, but an entire congregation, as well.
15 posted on 05/31/2008 2:52:52 AM PDT by Krankor (kROGER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: proud2beconservativeinNJ

I just watched it at the link above. What a repellent creature the man is. I assume Cdl George has just pretended to be ignorant of this for all these years, hoping that Phleger will just go away or mysteriously evaporate during the night so he doesn’t have to do anything about him. Typical bishop behavior.

But this is completely beyond the pale. It’s definitely political and I don’t see how the bishop can continue, simply from the IRS point of view, to let this man rant like this and continue to be pastor of a Catholic church.

Also, don’t the blacks in the audience who are watching this white guy pretending to be black feel a little - uh, condescended to? I guess not, since they are on their feet clapping and shouting with delerium. But really. How stupid can they be?


16 posted on 05/31/2008 2:54:11 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: livius

The biggest thing that needs to be brought up is this $200,000.00 B.H. Obama got “ taxpayers to give this guy the money. This anti-white racist if Mc Cain got some white racist $200,000 from the taxpayers he would be done.


17 posted on 05/31/2008 3:09:06 AM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Jim Jones never left.


18 posted on 05/31/2008 3:15:20 AM PDT by junta (It's Poltical Correctness stupid! Hold liberals accountable for their actions, a new idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

How does that “church” maintain it’s IRS status?


19 posted on 05/31/2008 3:23:40 AM PDT by wastoute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exhaustguy
Not really. They have violated an executive order of LBJ, never rescinded, that he put in place to punish someone he was running against in Texas. Such an order is as anathema to freedom of speech as McCain/Feingold.

My bad. It was after he ran for the U.S. Senate from Texas and won by a few votes that it was rumored that he had stolen the election. Some election official later made a deathbed confession that this was, indeed, the truth. Johnson was afraid the churches would call for his defeat and managed to get a line inserted into IRS legislation in 1954 that churches that engaged in political speech would endanger their tax-exempt status. This is still just as anathema to freedom of speech as McCain/Feingold.<

Here's a more concise summary:
the “Johnson Amendment” was first inserted into the tax code in a sneaky and underhanded manner, without due consideration by Congress or open debate. Lyndon B. Johnson, when he first ran for Senate in the state of Texas, seems to have stolen the election. An election judge admitted as much on his death bed, and told exactly how he had helped Johnson steal the election. A lot of Texas preachers knew about this, so the next time Johnson came up for re election, in 1954, they told their congregations exactly what they thought about his lack of honesty and integrity. So, Johnson thought of a novel way to shut them up. He quietly slipped an amendment into the tax code stating that churches and non profits could not endorse candidates or engage in political speech. This amendment was never openly debated on the floor, and many Congressmen did not even know it was there when they voted on the tax bill.

20 posted on 05/31/2008 3:23:51 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson